Employment Interview Processes and Applicant Evaluation
Summary
Employment interviews constitute a pivotal stage in personnel selection, encompassing a series of preparatory and evaluative steps designed to predict job performance and fit. The process typically begins with job analysis to identify critical competencies, followed by the development of structured or semi-structured interview guides. Structured interviews employ standardised questions and scoring rubrics to enhance reliability and reduce bias, whereas unstructured formats allow greater conversational flexibility at the cost of consistency. Applicant evaluation incorporates multiple criteria, including verbal responses, behavioural examples, situational judgment, and non-verbal cues. Reliability and validity are maximised through interviewer training, panel ratings and the use of standardised rating scales. Contemporary concerns include applicants’ impression management tactics—both honest self-promotion and deceptive faking—and the potential distortion of validity. Technological advances have introduced video, teleconference and automated interfaces, which promise efficiency gains but raise questions about fairness, candidate reactions and the equivalence of ratings across modes. Equity considerations, such as demographic biases and disparate impact, underscore the need for continual validation and fairness checks. In a globalised labour market, cross-cultural adaption of interview protocols and the integration of machine-learning tools for applicant screening have become increasingly significant, shaping both research and practice in human resource management.
Research from Nature Portfolio
No recent Nature Portfolio content available.
Employment Interview Processes and Applicant Evaluation publication trend
The graph below shows the total number of articles in employment interview processes and applicant evaluation across all publications each year (not limited to Nature Index journals).
Technical terms
Asynchronous video interview: A format in which candidates record responses to predetermined questions at their convenience, with no live interviewer present.
Impression management: Strategic behaviours by applicants to influence interviewer perceptions, ranging from honest self-promotion to deceptive faking.
Structured interview: An interview format with standardised questions and rating scales applied uniformly to all candidates to enhance reliability and validity.
Algorithmic decision-making (ADM): The use of computer algorithms and machine learning to analyse applicant data and support selection decisions.
Reliability and validity: Psychometric properties indicating the consistency of measurement and the extent to which an interview predicts job performance, respectively.
References
- Revealing the influence of AI and its interfaces on job candidates' honest and deceptive impression management in asynchronous video interviews. Technological Forecasting and Social Change (2024).
- Beyond traditional interviews: Psychometric analysis of asynchronous video interviews for personality and interview performance evaluation using machine learning. Computers in Human Behavior (2024).
- This (AI)n’t fair? Employee reactions to artificial intelligence (AI) in career development systems. Review of Managerial Science (2024).
About these summaries
This Nature Research Intelligence Topic summary is created with the cited references and a large language model. We take care to ground generated text with facts, and have systems in place to gain human feedback on the overall quality of the process in line with our AI principles. We strive to create accurate and useful summaries for people unfamiliar with the research topic and that supports this goal. These pages are a beta release and will be updated as we learn how best to help people gain value from a research topic summary.
Turn complex research questions into confident strategic decisions
When you're under pressure to set direction, justify investment, or understand your competitive position, you need more than raw data — you need trusted insights you can act on.
Benchmark your performance against global peers using robust, methodologically sound analysis.
Combine quantitative metrics with qualitative expert insight to uncover strengths, gaps and emerging opportunities.
Gain tailored, decision-ready recommendations aligned to your strategic priorities.
Talk to us to learn more about our data dashboards and bespoke strategy reports.
Grow research skills, confidence and careers with training built for every stage of the research lifecycle.
Developed with Nature Portfolio journal Editors and internationally renowned experts. Discover three ways to learn:
Self-paced, online courses in convenient bite-sized units, covering key skills across scientific writing, publishing, grant writing, data analysis, and more.
Expert trainer-led workshops with hands-on exercises and real-time feedback across core research skills, delivered via interactive group sessions.
Editor-led workshops combining core principles in writing and publishing, personalised 1:1 feedback from Nature Portfolio Editors and hands-on exercises.
Explore course catalogues and workshop agendas, enquire about the options or request institutional pricing.