Genotoxicity Assessment in Mammalian Systems
Summary
Genotoxicity assessment in mammalian systems encompasses a suite of in vitro and in vivo assays designed to detect DNA damage, gene mutations and chromosomal aberrations induced by chemical and physical agents. Core methodologies include the comet assay for strand-break detection, micronucleus and chromosome aberration tests for clastogenic and aneugenic effects, and gene mutation assays such as the PIG-A or transgenic rodent mutation (TGR) assays. Recent emphasis has shifted from purely qualitative hazard identification towards quantitative dose–response analysis, employing benchmark dose metrics and margin of exposure calculations to inform risk-based decision making. Advances in three-dimensional tissue models and humanised cell lines are enhancing physiological relevance, while high-throughput and flow cytometric platforms are increasing sensitivity and throughput. Integration of mechanistic endpoints, such as DNA repair kinetics and cell-cycle perturbations, alongside traditional genotoxicity readouts, is refining mode-of-action understanding. Collectively, these developments bolster the global regulatory framework by improving the accuracy of human risk assessment and reducing reliance on animal studies through the adoption of alternative and integrated testing strategies.
Research from Nature Portfolio
No recent Nature Portfolio content available.
Genotoxicity Assessment in Mammalian Systems publication trend
The graph below shows the total number of articles in genotoxicity assessment in mammalian systems across all publications each year (not limited to Nature Index journals).
Technical terms
Benchmark dose (BMD): A dose level derived from a statistical model of the dose–response curve corresponding to a predefined change in effect, used as a point of departure for risk assessment.
Margin of exposure (MOE): The ratio between a reference point (e.g., BMD) and estimated human exposure, applied to characterise risk and prioritise substances.
Comet assay: A sensitive gel electrophoresis method for detecting DNA strand breaks and alkali-labile sites in single cells.
PIG-A assay: An in vitro or in vivo mutation test measuring loss of glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchor synthesis due to mutations in the PIG-A gene, indicative of gene-inactivating events.
References
- Genotoxicity assessment: opportunities, challenges and perspectives for quantitative evaluations of dose–response data. Archives of Toxicology (2023).
- Reconstructed human intestinal comet assay, a possible alternative in vitro model for genotoxicity assessment. Mutagenesis (2023).
- Assessment of the In Vitro Phosphatidylinositol Glycan Class A (PIG-A) Gene Mutation Assay Using Human TK6 and Mouse Hepa1c1c7 Cell Lines. Journal of Xenobiotics (2024).
About these summaries
This Nature Research Intelligence Topic summary is created with the cited references and a large language model. We take care to ground generated text with facts, and have systems in place to gain human feedback on the overall quality of the process in line with our AI principles. We strive to create accurate and useful summaries for people unfamiliar with the research topic and that supports this goal. These pages are a beta release and will be updated as we learn how best to help people gain value from a research topic summary.
Turn complex research questions into confident strategic decisions
When you're under pressure to set direction, justify investment, or understand your competitive position, you need more than raw data — you need trusted insights you can act on.
Benchmark your performance against global peers using robust, methodologically sound analysis.
Combine quantitative metrics with qualitative expert insight to uncover strengths, gaps and emerging opportunities.
Gain tailored, decision-ready recommendations aligned to your strategic priorities.
Talk to us to learn more about our data dashboards and bespoke strategy reports.
Grow research skills, confidence and careers with training built for every stage of the research lifecycle.
Developed with Nature Portfolio journal Editors and internationally renowned experts. Discover three ways to learn:
Self-paced, online courses in convenient bite-sized units, covering key skills across scientific writing, publishing, grant writing, data analysis, and more.
Expert trainer-led workshops with hands-on exercises and real-time feedback across core research skills, delivered via interactive group sessions.
Editor-led workshops combining core principles in writing and publishing, personalised 1:1 feedback from Nature Portfolio Editors and hands-on exercises.
Explore course catalogues and workshop agendas, enquire about the options or request institutional pricing.