Hesitant Fuzzy Decision-Making Techniques
Summary
Hesitant fuzzy decision-making techniques address situations in which experts or stakeholders hesitate among several possible values when assessing the membership of an alternative to a given set. By allowing a set of candidate membership degrees rather than a single crisp value, this approach captures ambiguity and diversity of opinion in environments as varied as resource allocation, supplier selection, risk assessment and healthcare planning. Core components include distance and similarity measures to compare hesitant profiles, aggregation operators to fuse multiple hesitant evaluations, and ranking methods—often based on extensions of TOPSIS or other multi-criteria decision-making frameworks. Over the past decade, numerous generalisations have enriched the original model, introducing non-membership hesitation, probability or proportional weights, temporal sequencing and hierarchical ranking of evaluations. These methods collectively enhance the flexibility and descriptive power of fuzzy decision support when precise quantification is infeasible or when group consensus must reflect a spectrum of expert judgments.
Research from Nature Portfolio
No recent Nature Portfolio content available.
Research from all publishers
Building on the seminal formulation of hesitant fuzzy sets, the concept of dual hesitant fuzzy sets was introduced to integrate simultaneous hesitation in both membership and non-membership degrees. This model offers richer expressiveness when experts express concurrent favourable and unfavourable assessments and has been applied to clustering, correlation analysis and multi-attribute group decision-making, demonstrating improved discrimination among alternatives without resorting to ad hoc data extension.
More recently, ranked hesitant fuzzy sets have emerged as an intuitive extension that orders multiple evaluations by their plausibility or credibility without requiring explicit probability or proportional weights. By assigning a strict ranking among candidate values, this method simplifies aggregation and scoring in multi-agent contexts, yielding robust decision rules and facilitating implementation via computational tools.
Another advance is the time-sequential hesitant fuzzy set, designed to capture how expert hesitation evolves over successive time points. This formulation introduces operators and score functions that reflect temporal fluctuations in confidence, enabling more dynamic decision models in settings such as project management and real-time monitoring where assessments change as information accrues.
Hesitant Fuzzy Decision-Making Techniques publication trend
The graph below shows the total number of articles in hesitant fuzzy decision-making techniques across all publications each year (not limited to Nature Index journals).
Technical terms
Hesitant fuzzy set: A fuzzy set in which each element is associated with a finite set of possible membership degrees, reflecting expert hesitation.
Dual hesitant fuzzy set: An extension of hesitant fuzzy sets that allows separate sets of possible values for both membership and non-membership degrees.
Ranked hesitant fuzzy set: A hesitant fuzzy set in which candidate membership values are arranged in a strict order according to plausibility or importance.
Time-sequential hesitant fuzzy set: A model in which hesitant evaluations are indexed by time, capturing how membership hesitation evolves across successive assessments.
References
- Dual Hesitant Fuzzy Sets. Journal of Applied Mathematics (2012).
- Multiple‐Attribute Decision‐Making Problem Using TOPSIS and Choquet Integral with Hesitant Fuzzy Number Information. Mathematical Problems in Engineering (2020).
- Correlation Measures of Dual Hesitant Fuzzy Sets. Journal of Applied Mathematics (2013).
- Multi-Attribute Decision-Making Approach Based on Dual Hesitant Fuzzy Information Measures and Their Applications. Mathematics (2019).
- Ranked hesitant fuzzy sets for multi-criteria multi-agent decisions. Expert Systems with Applications (2022).
- Time-sequential hesitant fuzzy set and its application to multi-attribute decision making. Complex & Intelligent Systems (2022).
- A Novel Multi-Attribute Group Decision-Making Approach in the Framework of Proportional Dual Hesitant Fuzzy Sets. Applied Sciences (2019).
- Interval-Valued Probabilistic Dual Hesitant Fuzzy Sets for Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems (2019).
About these summaries
This Nature Research Intelligence Topic summary is created with the cited references and a large language model. We take care to ground generated text with facts, and have systems in place to gain human feedback on the overall quality of the process in line with our AI principles. We strive to create accurate and useful summaries for people unfamiliar with the research topic and that supports this goal. These pages are a beta release and will be updated as we learn how best to help people gain value from a research topic summary.
Turn complex research questions into confident strategic decisions
When you're under pressure to set direction, justify investment, or understand your competitive position, you need more than raw data — you need trusted insights you can act on.
Benchmark your performance against global peers using robust, methodologically sound analysis.
Combine quantitative metrics with qualitative expert insight to uncover strengths, gaps and emerging opportunities.
Gain tailored, decision-ready recommendations aligned to your strategic priorities.
Talk to us to learn more about our data dashboards and bespoke strategy reports.
Grow research skills, confidence and careers with training built for every stage of the research lifecycle.
Developed with Nature Portfolio journal Editors and internationally renowned experts. Discover three ways to learn:
Self-paced, online courses in convenient bite-sized units, covering key skills across scientific writing, publishing, grant writing, data analysis, and more.
Expert trainer-led workshops with hands-on exercises and real-time feedback across core research skills, delivered via interactive group sessions.
Editor-led workshops combining core principles in writing and publishing, personalised 1:1 feedback from Nature Portfolio Editors and hands-on exercises.
Explore course catalogues and workshop agendas, enquire about the options or request institutional pricing.