Immune-Related Response Assessment in Solid Tumors
Summary
Immunotherapy has transformed the management of solid tumours by harnessing the patient’s own immune system to recognise and attack cancer cells. Unlike conventional cytotoxic therapies, immune checkpoint inhibitors and other immunomodulatory agents can provoke atypical patterns of response, including initial enlargement of lesions followed by regression, or the appearance of new lesions before overall tumour control. These phenomena, termed pseudoprogression and hyperprogression, pose challenges for clinical decision-making and trial design. To address these issues, modified response criteria have been developed that build upon the established Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST), introducing features such as the measurement of new lesions within total tumour burden and mandatory confirmation of progression. The accurate assessment of immune-related responses requires integration of radiological evaluation, biomarker analysis and clinical context, with the goal of distinguishing true treatment failure from transient inflammatory changes. Refining these criteria has global significance for optimising patient outcomes, guiding continuation or cessation of therapy, and informing regulatory endpoints for novel agents.
Research from Nature Portfolio
Recent studies have proposed evidence-based refinements to immune-related response criteria, outlining the steps required to validate a modified RECIST framework (iRECIST) in prospective settings. These analyses emphasise the need for standardised definitions of unconfirmed and confirmed progression, integration of new-lesion measurements into total tumour burden calculations, and harmonisation across trial sites. Early efforts have focused on developing statistical models to compare these novel criteria with conventional RECIST1.1, highlighting the potential for improved detection of true responses and reduction of premature treatment discontinuation.
Immune-Related Response Assessment in Solid Tumors publication trend
The graph below shows the total number of articles in immune-related response assessment in solid tumors across all publications each year (not limited to Nature Index journals).
Technical terms
RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours): Standardised guidelines using tumour size measurements to classify response to therapy.
irRECIST (immune-related RECIST): Modified RECIST that incorporates new lesion measurements and requires confirmation of progression to account for immune effects.
Pseudoprogression: Apparent increase in tumour size or new lesions due to immune cell infiltration rather than true tumour growth.
Hyperprogression: Accelerated tumour growth observed in a subset of patients following immunotherapy.
Tumour burden: Quantitative assessment of the total amount of cancer in the body, often measured by imaging.
Immune checkpoint inhibitor: A class of drugs that block regulatory pathways in T cells to enhance anti-tumour immunity.
References
- Towards evidence-based response criteria for cancer immunotherapy. Nature Communications (2023).
- Immune-related response assessment during PD-1 inhibitor therapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients. Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer (2016).
- Monitoring of KRAS -mutated ctDNA to discriminate pseudo-progression from true progression during anti-PD-1 treatment of lung adenocarcinoma. Oncotarget (2017).
- Imaging of tumour response to immunotherapy. European Radiology Experimental (2020).
About these summaries
This Nature Research Intelligence Topic summary is created with the cited references and a large language model. We take care to ground generated text with facts, and have systems in place to gain human feedback on the overall quality of the process in line with our AI principles. We strive to create accurate and useful summaries for people unfamiliar with the research topic and that supports this goal. These pages are a beta release and will be updated as we learn how best to help people gain value from a research topic summary.
Turn complex research questions into confident strategic decisions
When you're under pressure to set direction, justify investment, or understand your competitive position, you need more than raw data — you need trusted insights you can act on.
Benchmark your performance against global peers using robust, methodologically sound analysis.
Combine quantitative metrics with qualitative expert insight to uncover strengths, gaps and emerging opportunities.
Gain tailored, decision-ready recommendations aligned to your strategic priorities.
Talk to us to learn more about our data dashboards and bespoke strategy reports.
Grow research skills, confidence and careers with training built for every stage of the research lifecycle.
Developed with Nature Portfolio journal Editors and internationally renowned experts. Discover three ways to learn:
Self-paced, online courses in convenient bite-sized units, covering key skills across scientific writing, publishing, grant writing, data analysis, and more.
Expert trainer-led workshops with hands-on exercises and real-time feedback across core research skills, delivered via interactive group sessions.
Editor-led workshops combining core principles in writing and publishing, personalised 1:1 feedback from Nature Portfolio Editors and hands-on exercises.
Explore course catalogues and workshop agendas, enquire about the options or request institutional pricing.