Intergroup Contact and Prejudice Reduction Strategies
Summary
Intergroup contact theorises that structured interactions between members of different social groups can reduce prejudice and foster positive relations. Originating with Allport’s contact hypothesis, key conditions for effective contact include equal status, common goals, cooperation and institutional support. Over the past decades, research has extended beyond face-to-face encounters to include indirect forms of contact—such as extended contact (learning about friends’ cross-group friendships), imagined contact (mental rehearsal of positive interactions) and parasocial contact (exposure to out-group members through media). Mechanisms underpinning these effects encompass reducing intergroup anxiety, challenging stereotypes through individuating information, and promoting empathy via perspective-taking. Contemporary strategies also integrate cognitive interventions that encourage novel category combinations and narrative exchanges to generalise tolerance across multiple out-groups. Applications range from school-based programmes and workplace diversity training to community peacebuilding initiatives in post-conflict settings. Evidence highlights that individual differences—such as social dominance orientation—and contextual factors—such as neighbourhood composition—moderate the efficacy of contact. A holistic understanding of these dynamics underpins the design of scalable, culturally sensitive interventions with global relevance for reducing bias, reinforcing social cohesion and informing policy in plural societies.
Research from Nature Portfolio
No recent Nature Portfolio content available.
Intergroup Contact and Prejudice Reduction Strategies publication trend
The graph below shows the total number of articles in intergroup contact and prejudice reduction strategies across all publications each year (not limited to Nature Index journals).
Technical terms
Intergroup contact: Structured interaction between members of different social groups designed to reduce prejudice.
Contact hypothesis: Theory proposing that under optimal conditions, intergroup contact reduces bias.
Extended contact: Reduction of prejudice achieved by knowing that an in-group friend has positive relationships with out-group members.
Parasocial contact: Indirect contact through media exposure to out-group individuals that mimics personal interaction.
Intergroup anxiety: Discomfort experienced when anticipating or engaging in contact with out-group members, often impeding positive outcomes.
References
- Seeking and avoiding intergroup contact: Future frontiers of research on building social integration. Social and Personality Psychology Compass (2018).
- Development of prejudice against immigrants and ethnic minorities in adolescence: A systematic review with meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Developmental Review (2021).
- Can Exposure to Celebrities Reduce Prejudice? The Effect of Mohamed Salah on Islamophobic Behaviors and Attitudes. American Political Science Review (2021).
- The role of individual differences in understanding and enhancing intergroup contact. Social and Personality Psychology Compass (2020).
- Intergroup Contact and Peacebuilding: Promoting Youth Civic Engagement in Northern Ireland. Journal of Social and Political Psychology (2017).
- Tolerance by Surprise: Evidence for a Generalized Reduction in Prejudice and Increased Egalitarianism through Novel Category Combination. PLOS ONE (2013).
- The Wallpaper Effect: The Contact Hypothesis Fails for Minority Group Members Who Live in Areas with a High Proportion of Majority Group Members. PLOS ONE (2013).
About these summaries
This Nature Research Intelligence Topic summary is created with the cited references and a large language model. We take care to ground generated text with facts, and have systems in place to gain human feedback on the overall quality of the process in line with our AI principles. We strive to create accurate and useful summaries for people unfamiliar with the research topic and that supports this goal. These pages are a beta release and will be updated as we learn how best to help people gain value from a research topic summary.
Turn complex research questions into confident strategic decisions
When you're under pressure to set direction, justify investment, or understand your competitive position, you need more than raw data — you need trusted insights you can act on.
Benchmark your performance against global peers using robust, methodologically sound analysis.
Combine quantitative metrics with qualitative expert insight to uncover strengths, gaps and emerging opportunities.
Gain tailored, decision-ready recommendations aligned to your strategic priorities.
Talk to us to learn more about our data dashboards and bespoke strategy reports.
Grow research skills, confidence and careers with training built for every stage of the research lifecycle.
Developed with Nature Portfolio journal Editors and internationally renowned experts. Discover three ways to learn:
Self-paced, online courses in convenient bite-sized units, covering key skills across scientific writing, publishing, grant writing, data analysis, and more.
Expert trainer-led workshops with hands-on exercises and real-time feedback across core research skills, delivered via interactive group sessions.
Editor-led workshops combining core principles in writing and publishing, personalised 1:1 feedback from Nature Portfolio Editors and hands-on exercises.
Explore course catalogues and workshop agendas, enquire about the options or request institutional pricing.