Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Techniques in Non-Male Factor Infertility
Summary
The advent of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) revolutionised assisted reproductive technology by enabling direct microinjection of a single sperm into the oocyte cytoplasm. Although originally conceived for male factor infertility, ICSI has been widely adopted in cases of non-male factor infertility—encompassing female-only or unexplained subfertility. Contemporary research has scrutinised whether this invasive technique confers advantages over conventional in vitro insemination in populations where sperm parameters fall within normal limits. Studies have compared key performance indicators such as fertilisation rates, embryo cleavage and blastocyst formation, implantation success and live birth outcomes. While ICSI consistently yields higher fertilisation and lower cycle cancellation rates, evidence on implantation and live birth suggests no clear overall benefit—particularly in female-only and unexplained infertility. Select subgroups, including patients with prior poor-quality embryos or specific immunological profiles, may experience improved embryo morphology and clinical pregnancy rates under ICSI protocols. The balance of laboratory efficiency, clinical effectiveness, cost, and potential impact on offspring safety underlines the need for judicious application of ICSI beyond male factor indications.
Research from Nature Portfolio
A recent large-scale retrospective cohort compared conventional insemination and ICSI in women with autoimmune thyroid conditions and non-male factor infertility. Propensity score matching ensured comparable baseline characteristics. Results demonstrated that ICSI did not improve fertilisation success or the development of high-quality cleavage embryos and was associated with lower usable blastocyst rates. Although clinical pregnancy and live birth rates did not differ significantly, the study concluded that ICSI neither enhances embryo development potential nor increases live birth outcomes in this population, emphasising the importance of randomised trials to guide practice.
Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Techniques in Non-Male Factor Infertility publication trend
The graph below shows the total number of articles in intracytoplasmic sperm injection techniques in non-male factor infertility across all publications each year (not limited to Nature Index journals).
Technical terms
Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI): A micromanipulation technique in which a single sperm is injected directly into the oocyte cytoplasm.
Non-male factor infertility: Infertility cases where sperm parameters are normal and reproductive impediments arise from female or unexplained causes.
Fertilisation rate: The percentage of oocytes that undergo successful union with sperm and form pronuclei.
Blastocyst: A stage-5 preimplantation embryo characterised by an inner cell mass and a fluid-filled cavity.
Live birth rate: The proportion of initiated treatment cycles resulting in a live neonate.
Embryo quality: A composite metric assessing morphology, cleavage speed and developmental competence.
References
- Comparisons of conventional in vitro fertilization versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection in women with thyroid autoimmunity and non-male factor infertility, a propensity score matching analysis. Scientific Reports (2023).
- Intracytoplasmic sperm injection versus conventional in vitro insemination in couples with non-male infertility factor in the ‘real-world’ setting: analysis of the HFEA registry. Journal of Translational Medicine (2024).
- Impact of intracytoplasmic sperm injection in women with non-male factor infertility: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Reproductive Health (2022).
- Should ICSI be implemented on patients with poor-quality embryos in the previous IVF cycle?. Heliyon (2023).
About these summaries
This Nature Research Intelligence Topic summary is created with the cited references and a large language model. We take care to ground generated text with facts, and have systems in place to gain human feedback on the overall quality of the process in line with our AI principles. We strive to create accurate and useful summaries for people unfamiliar with the research topic and that supports this goal. These pages are a beta release and will be updated as we learn how best to help people gain value from a research topic summary.
Turn complex research questions into confident strategic decisions
When you're under pressure to set direction, justify investment, or understand your competitive position, you need more than raw data — you need trusted insights you can act on.
Benchmark your performance against global peers using robust, methodologically sound analysis.
Combine quantitative metrics with qualitative expert insight to uncover strengths, gaps and emerging opportunities.
Gain tailored, decision-ready recommendations aligned to your strategic priorities.
Talk to us to learn more about our data dashboards and bespoke strategy reports.
Grow research skills, confidence and careers with training built for every stage of the research lifecycle.
Developed with Nature Portfolio journal Editors and internationally renowned experts. Discover three ways to learn:
Self-paced, online courses in convenient bite-sized units, covering key skills across scientific writing, publishing, grant writing, data analysis, and more.
Expert trainer-led workshops with hands-on exercises and real-time feedback across core research skills, delivered via interactive group sessions.
Editor-led workshops combining core principles in writing and publishing, personalised 1:1 feedback from Nature Portfolio Editors and hands-on exercises.
Explore course catalogues and workshop agendas, enquire about the options or request institutional pricing.