Multicriteria Decision-Making in Healthcare Systems and Applications

Summary

Multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) in healthcare addresses the inherently complex challenge of choosing among alternatives when objectives conflict and data are uncertain. Decisions range from allocating scarce resources and designing service networks to selecting treatment strategies and prioritising patients for interventions. Central to this field is the integration of clinical expertise, stakeholder preferences and quantitative indicators into coherent models. Techniques such as the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and various fuzzy-logic approaches enable decision-makers to structure problems hierarchically, assign weights to criteria and derive transparent rankings. Recent digital-health developments have further enriched MCDM applications, incorporating electronic health records, telemedicine data streams and real-time monitoring to refine prioritisation in chronic disease management, pandemic response and hospital operations. By reconciling efficiency, equity and quality objectives, MCDM frameworks have become essential tools for policy-makers, clinicians and administrators seeking evidence-based, reproducible and stakeholder-sensitive solutions across global healthcare systems.

Research from Nature Portfolio

No recent Nature Portfolio content available.

Multicriteria Decision-Making in Healthcare Systems and Applications publication trend

The graph below shows the total number of articles in multicriteria decision-making in healthcare systems and applications across all publications each year (not limited to Nature Index journals).

Technical terms

Multicriteria Decision-Making (MCDM): A class of methodologies that assess, compare and rank alternatives based on several, often conflicting, criteria.

Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP): A structured decision-making technique that decomposes a problem into a hierarchy of criteria and uses pairwise comparisons to derive priority scales.

TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution): A ranking method that evaluates alternatives by measuring their relative distance to an ideal best and an ideal worst solution.

Fuzzy Sets: Mathematical constructs that allow elements to belong to a set with varying degrees of membership, capturing uncertainty and vagueness in decision-making inputs.

References

  1. Multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) in health care: a systematic review of the main characteristics and methodological steps. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making (2018).
  2. Novel dynamic fuzzy Decision-Making framework for COVID-19 vaccine dose recipients. Journal of Advanced Research (2021).
  3. Based on T-spherical fuzzy environment: A combination of FWZIC and FDOSM for prioritising COVID-19 vaccine dose recipients. Journal of Infection and Public Health (2021).
  4. A Uniform Intelligent Prioritisation for Solving Diverse and Big Data Generated From Multiple Chronic Diseases Patients Based on Hybrid Decision-Making and Voting Method. IEEE Access (2020).
Nature Strategy Reports
Turn complex research questions into confident strategic decisions 

When you're under pressure to set direction, justify investment, or understand your competitive position, you need more than raw data — you need trusted insights you can act on.

  • Benchmark your performance against global peers using robust, methodologically sound analysis.

  • Combine quantitative metrics with qualitative expert insight to uncover strengths, gaps and emerging opportunities.

  • Gain tailored, decision-ready recommendations aligned to your strategic priorities.

Talk to us to learn more about our data dashboards and bespoke strategy reports.

Nature Masterclasses
Grow research skills, confidence and careers with training built for every stage of the research lifecycle.

Developed with Nature Portfolio journal Editors and internationally renowned experts. Discover three ways to learn:

  • Self-paced, online courses in convenient bite-sized units, covering key skills across scientific writing, publishing, grant writing, data analysis, and more.

  • Expert trainer-led workshops with hands-on exercises and real-time feedback across core research skills, delivered via interactive group sessions.

  • Editor-led workshops combining core principles in writing and publishing, personalised 1:1 feedback from Nature Portfolio Editors and hands-on exercises.

Explore course catalogues and workshop agendas, enquire about the options or request institutional pricing.