Natural Cycle In Vitro Fertilization Outcomes

Summary

Natural cycle IVF (NC-IVF) refers to the retrieval of a single mature oocyte in an unstimulated menstrual cycle, avoiding the exogenous gonadotropin regimens characteristic of conventional protocols. This method has gained traction for its minimal intervention profile, reduced risk of ovarian hyperstimulation and lower medication costs. Although per-cycle live birth rates are generally lower than those achieved with stimulated cycles, patient selection and cumulative treatment strategies can yield comparable overall success, especially in women with diminished ovarian reserve or poor response to stimulation. Recent work has illuminated the roles of follicular growth dynamics, hormonal markers and precise timing of oocyte retrieval in optimising fertilisation rates and embryo quality. Computational models have also been developed to predict cycle outcomes, enhancing clinician–patient counselling. As interest grows in more physiological approaches to assisted reproduction, NC-IVF is emerging as a globally significant option that combines safety, patient comfort and practical applicability within varied healthcare settings.

Research from Nature Portfolio

No recent Nature Portfolio content available.

Natural Cycle In Vitro Fertilization Outcomes publication trend

The graph below shows the total number of articles in natural cycle in vitro fertilization outcomes across all publications each year (not limited to Nature Index journals).

Technical terms

Natural cycle IVF (NC-IVF): In vitro fertilisation conducted without pharmacological ovarian stimulation, retrieving a single naturally selected oocyte.

Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation: Use of exogenous gonadotropins to induce development of multiple follicles in conventional IVF protocols.

Diminished ovarian reserve (DOR): A clinical condition marked by reduced quantity and quality of oocytes, often assessed by anti-Müllerian hormone levels and antral follicle count.

Follicular diameter: Ultrasound measurement of follicle size, which correlates with oocyte maturity and fertilisation potential.

Machine learning prediction model: A computational algorithm trained on historical cycle data to estimate the probability of live birth in NC-IVF.

Area under the curve (AUC): A statistical metric evaluating a model’s overall discriminative performance between successful and unsuccessful outcomes.

References

  1. The potential influence of follicle diameter on natural cycle in vitro fertilization among women with diminished ovarian reserve: a retrospective cohort study. Journal of Ovarian Research (2023).
  2. Comparison of embryo quality and pregnancy outcomes for patients with low ovarian reserve in natural cycles and mildly stimulated cycles: a cohort study. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (2024).
  3. Live-Birth Prediction of Natural-Cycle In Vitro Fertilization Using 57,558 Linked Cycle Records: A Machine Learning Perspective. Frontiers in Endocrinology (2022).
  4. Gonadotropin Stimulation Reduces the Implantation and Live Birth Rate but Not the Miscarriage Rate of Embryos Transferred When Compared to Unstimulated In Vitro Fertilization. Reproductive Sciences (2022).

About these summaries

This Nature Research Intelligence Topic summary is created with the cited references and a large language model. We take care to ground generated text with facts, and have systems in place to gain human feedback on the overall quality of the process in line with our AI principles. We strive to create accurate and useful summaries for people unfamiliar with the research topic and that supports this goal. These pages are a beta release and will be updated as we learn how best to help people gain value from a research topic summary.

Nature Strategy Reports
Turn complex research questions into confident strategic decisions 

When you're under pressure to set direction, justify investment, or understand your competitive position, you need more than raw data — you need trusted insights you can act on.

  • Benchmark your performance against global peers using robust, methodologically sound analysis.

  • Combine quantitative metrics with qualitative expert insight to uncover strengths, gaps and emerging opportunities.

  • Gain tailored, decision-ready recommendations aligned to your strategic priorities.

Talk to us to learn more about our data dashboards and bespoke strategy reports.

Nature Masterclasses
Grow research skills, confidence and careers with training built for every stage of the research lifecycle.

Developed with Nature Portfolio journal Editors and internationally renowned experts. Discover three ways to learn:

  • Self-paced, online courses in convenient bite-sized units, covering key skills across scientific writing, publishing, grant writing, data analysis, and more.

  • Expert trainer-led workshops with hands-on exercises and real-time feedback across core research skills, delivered via interactive group sessions.

  • Editor-led workshops combining core principles in writing and publishing, personalised 1:1 feedback from Nature Portfolio Editors and hands-on exercises.

Explore course catalogues and workshop agendas, enquire about the options or request institutional pricing.