Summary

Low-value health care services are those that confer little or no benefit to patients, may cause harm and contribute to the inefficient use of limited resources. Such services span diagnostic tests, imaging procedures, medications and routine interventions whose routine application is unsupported by robust evidence or misaligned with patient preferences. Worldwide, estimates suggest that 10–30 per cent of health care expenditure may be consumed by low-value practices. Drivers include fear of litigation, financial incentives, patient demand and fragmented information systems. Optimising low-value care requires systematic identification of overused practices, engagement of stakeholders, adaptation of service delivery and integration of decision support tools. Central strategies involve de-implementation—actively reducing or stopping entrenched but ineffective interventions—and the tailoring of policies and workflows to local contexts. Success hinges on multidisciplinary collaboration, robust monitoring of service use, feedback mechanisms for clinicians and patients, and alignment of incentives with evidence-based care. Real-world examples include limiting routine preoperative testing in low-risk surgery, reducing repeated imaging for uncomplicated back pain and curbing unnecessary antibiotic prescriptions in viral illnesses. When effectively deployed, optimisation not only improves patient safety and experience but also generates savings that can be reinvested in high-value services and innovation.

Research from Nature Portfolio

No recent Nature Portfolio content available.

Optimizing Low-Value Health Care Services publication trend

The graph below shows the total number of articles in optimizing low-value health care services across all publications each year (not limited to Nature Index journals).

Technical terms

Low-value care: A service whose costs, risks or harms outweigh any likely clinical benefit.
De-implementation: Structured efforts to reduce or discontinue use of established but unsupported health-care practices.
Multi-component intervention: A coordinated programme that combines two or more strategies (for example, education, guidelines and workflow redesign) to change clinical behaviour.
Stakeholder interrelationships: Collaborative networks among clinicians, patients, administrators and policymakers that support coherent change processes.

References

  1. Effectiveness of de-implementation of low-value healthcare practices: an overview of systematic reviews. Implementation Science (2024).
  2. Limit, lean or listen? A typology of low-value care that gives direction in de-implementation. International Journal for Quality in Health Care (2018).
  3. Interventions to reduce low-value imaging – a systematic review of interventions and outcomes. BMC Health Services Research (2021).
  4. Determinants for the use and de-implementation of low-value care in health care: a scoping review. Implementation Science Communications (2021).

About these summaries

This Nature Research Intelligence Topic summary is created with the cited references and a large language model. We take care to ground generated text with facts, and have systems in place to gain human feedback on the overall quality of the process in line with our AI principles. We strive to create accurate and useful summaries for people unfamiliar with the research topic and that supports this goal. These pages are a beta release and will be updated as we learn how best to help people gain value from a research topic summary.

Nature Strategy Reports
Turn complex research questions into confident strategic decisions 

When you're under pressure to set direction, justify investment, or understand your competitive position, you need more than raw data — you need trusted insights you can act on.

  • Benchmark your performance against global peers using robust, methodologically sound analysis.

  • Combine quantitative metrics with qualitative expert insight to uncover strengths, gaps and emerging opportunities.

  • Gain tailored, decision-ready recommendations aligned to your strategic priorities.

Talk to us to learn more about our data dashboards and bespoke strategy reports.

Nature Masterclasses
Grow research skills, confidence and careers with training built for every stage of the research lifecycle.

Developed with Nature Portfolio journal Editors and internationally renowned experts. Discover three ways to learn:

  • Self-paced, online courses in convenient bite-sized units, covering key skills across scientific writing, publishing, grant writing, data analysis, and more.

  • Expert trainer-led workshops with hands-on exercises and real-time feedback across core research skills, delivered via interactive group sessions.

  • Editor-led workshops combining core principles in writing and publishing, personalised 1:1 feedback from Nature Portfolio Editors and hands-on exercises.

Explore course catalogues and workshop agendas, enquire about the options or request institutional pricing.