Patient Preferences in HIV Treatment and Testing
Summary
Patients’ values and preferences play a pivotal role in optimising both antiretroviral therapy and HIV testing services. Individuals living with HIV often balance the efficacy of medication against potential side effects, dosing frequency, pill burden and the perceived impact on daily life. Similarly, preferences for testing modalities—whether rapid point-of-care tests, self-sampling or facility-based screening—depend on factors such as privacy, waiting time, sample collection method and cost. Discrete choice experiments and other stated-preference methods have been widely used to elicit these priorities, revealing marked heterogeneity across populations. Understanding such variation has informed the design of differentiated service delivery models, enhanced adherence, improved retention in care and increased uptake of testing among diverse groups, including pregnant women, key populations and communities in resource-limited settings. Integrating patient preferences into policy can strengthen person-centred care, reduce barriers to service uptake and ultimately contribute to global efforts to achieve universal treatment and diagnosis targets.
Research from Nature Portfolio
No recent Nature Portfolio content available.
Patient Preferences in HIV Treatment and Testing publication trend
The graph below shows the total number of articles in patient preferences in hiv treatment and testing across all publications each year (not limited to Nature Index journals).
Technical terms
Discrete choice experiment (DCE): A quantitative technique that presents individuals with hypothetical scenarios composed of multiple attributes and levels, enabling the estimation of the relative importance of each attribute in decision-making.
Antiretroviral therapy (ART): The regimen of medications prescribed to suppress HIV replication, preserve immune function and prevent disease progression.
Preference heterogeneity: The variation in expressed priorities and choices among individuals or subgroups, reflecting diverse values, experiences and circumstances.
References
- Patients’ preferences for antiretroviral therapy service provision: a systematic review. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation (2021).
- How Can the Health System Retain Women in HIV Treatment for a Lifetime? A Discrete Choice Experiment in Ethiopia and Mozambique. PLOS ONE (2016).
- Heterogeneous HIV Testing Preferences in an Urban Setting in Tanzania: Results from a Discrete Choice Experiment. PLOS ONE (2014).
- Stated-preference research in HIV: A scoping review. PLOS ONE (2019).
About these summaries
This Nature Research Intelligence Topic summary is created with the cited references and a large language model. We take care to ground generated text with facts, and have systems in place to gain human feedback on the overall quality of the process in line with our AI principles. We strive to create accurate and useful summaries for people unfamiliar with the research topic and that supports this goal. These pages are a beta release and will be updated as we learn how best to help people gain value from a research topic summary.
Nature Index 2026 Regenerative medicine
Regenerative medicine has the potential to transform the treatment of chronic and life-threatening diseases. But major challenges remain, such as overcoming immune rejection and ensuring that new therapies are developed using more inclusive data sets. In this supplement, we explore the discoveries that are driving the field, the barriers that could limit its progress, and the teams and institutions that are making their mark.
Turn complex research questions into confident strategic decisions
When you're under pressure to set direction, justify investment, or understand your competitive position, you need more than raw data — you need trusted insights you can act on.
Benchmark your performance against global peers using robust, methodologically sound analysis.
Combine quantitative metrics with qualitative expert insight to uncover strengths, gaps and emerging opportunities.
Gain tailored, decision-ready recommendations aligned to your strategic priorities.
Talk to us to learn more about our data dashboards and bespoke strategy reports.
Grow research skills, confidence and careers with training built for every stage of the research lifecycle.
Developed with Nature Portfolio journal Editors and internationally renowned experts. Discover three ways to learn:
Self-paced, online courses in convenient bite-sized units, covering key skills across scientific writing, publishing, grant writing, data analysis, and more.
Expert trainer-led workshops with hands-on exercises and real-time feedback across core research skills, delivered via interactive group sessions.
Editor-led workshops combining core principles in writing and publishing, personalised 1:1 feedback from Nature Portfolio Editors and hands-on exercises.
Explore course catalogues and workshop agendas, enquire about the options or request institutional pricing.