Preference Assessment in Developmental Disabilities
Summary
Preference assessment encompasses systematic methods for identifying stimuli that individuals with developmental disabilities value and that may function as effective reinforcers. Originating in applied behaviour analysis, these procedures range from single-stimulus presentations to multi-stimulus choice arrays and concurrent schedules. By tailoring interventions to each person’s unique preferences, practitioners can enhance motivation, promote skill acquisition and foster autonomy. In educational and therapeutic settings, preference assessments guide the selection of leisure activities, social interactions, tangible items and sensory experiences to reduce challenging behaviour and improve engagement. Recent advances emphasise dynamic assessment formats, frequent brief reassessments and technology-based delivery to accommodate non-verbal individuals and group contexts. Globally, integrating preference data into person-centred planning has proven instrumental in designing effective interventions for autism spectrum disorder, intellectual disability and severe multiple disabilities. Moreover, preference assessment now informs novel domains such as animal-assisted therapies and classroom group contingencies, demonstrating broad applicability and substantial gains in quality of life.
Research from Nature Portfolio
No recent Nature Portfolio content available.
Preference Assessment in Developmental Disabilities publication trend
The graph below shows the total number of articles in preference assessment in developmental disabilities across all publications each year (not limited to Nature Index journals).
Technical terms
Preference assessment: A procedure for identifying stimuli that increase the likelihood of a target response when delivered contingent on behaviour.
Multiple-stimulus without replacement (MSWO): A format presenting an array of selectable items; once chosen, items are removed and remaining options are reoffered to establish a preference hierarchy.
Concurrent-chains schedule: A choice procedure linking initial selections to subsequent reinforcement conditions, used to evaluate relative preference by examining response allocation.
Discriminated responding: Behaviour that consistently differentiates between available alternatives, indicating a clear preference.
Group contingency: An intervention in which reinforcement for the entire group depends on collective performance, often informed by group preference data.
References
- Eliminating biased selections during concurrent‐chains schedules: A discovery research example. Behavioral Interventions (2024).
- Effects of Initial versus Frequent Preference Assessments on Skill Acquisition. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities (2024).
- Using a Group Stimulus Preference Assessment to Design an Effective Group Contingency. Behavior Analysis in Practice (2024).
About these summaries
This Nature Research Intelligence Topic summary is created with the cited references and a large language model. We take care to ground generated text with facts, and have systems in place to gain human feedback on the overall quality of the process in line with our AI principles. We strive to create accurate and useful summaries for people unfamiliar with the research topic and that supports this goal. These pages are a beta release and will be updated as we learn how best to help people gain value from a research topic summary.
Turn complex research questions into confident strategic decisions
When you're under pressure to set direction, justify investment, or understand your competitive position, you need more than raw data — you need trusted insights you can act on.
Benchmark your performance against global peers using robust, methodologically sound analysis.
Combine quantitative metrics with qualitative expert insight to uncover strengths, gaps and emerging opportunities.
Gain tailored, decision-ready recommendations aligned to your strategic priorities.
Talk to us to learn more about our data dashboards and bespoke strategy reports.
Grow research skills, confidence and careers with training built for every stage of the research lifecycle.
Developed with Nature Portfolio journal Editors and internationally renowned experts. Discover three ways to learn:
Self-paced, online courses in convenient bite-sized units, covering key skills across scientific writing, publishing, grant writing, data analysis, and more.
Expert trainer-led workshops with hands-on exercises and real-time feedback across core research skills, delivered via interactive group sessions.
Editor-led workshops combining core principles in writing and publishing, personalised 1:1 feedback from Nature Portfolio Editors and hands-on exercises.
Explore course catalogues and workshop agendas, enquire about the options or request institutional pricing.