Quantum Coherence and Macroscopic Realism in Quantum Systems
Summary
Quantum coherence, the maintenance of fixed phase relations between quantum states, underpins phenomena from superconductivity to quantum information processing. At microscopic scales, coherent superpositions are well established, but their persistence and consequences in larger, potentially macroscopic systems remain a central challenge. Macroscopic realism posits that macroscopic objects always occupy definite states independent of observation, a view tested by inequalities and temporal‐correlation criteria designed to reveal nonclassical behaviour. Violations of these criteria—most notably Leggett–Garg inequalities—demonstrate the incompatibility of macroscopic realism with quantum theory. Research now spans from trapped ions and superconducting circuits to optomechanical resonators, probing how environmental interactions, energy constraints and measurement back‐action influence coherence and apparent classicality. Theoretical advances in open‐system dynamics and resource quantification, including refinements of quantum Fisher information and temporal correlation witnesses, have deepened understanding of when and how quantum coherence can persist or be observed at larger scales. These insights inform both foundational tests of quantum theory and emerging quantum technologies, such as high‐precision sensors and scalable qubit architectures, by elucidating the boundary between quantum superposition and classical realism.
Research from Nature Portfolio
Recent studies have investigated the robustness of quantum‐temporal correlations under realistic conditions, showing that a driven and dissipative qubit subject to energy constraints violates Leggett–Garg inequalities to varying degrees depending on dephasing and measurement coarsening. Pure coherent dynamics achieve maximal temporal‐inequality violations, whereas dissipative or driven systems display reduced nonclassical signatures. In a foundational experiment with a superconducting flux qubit, a refined protocol closed the clumsiness loophole and unambiguously demonstrated superposition of macroscopically distinct current states, ruling out broad classes of macrorealist modifications by many standard deviations. These works collectively advance the precision and conceptual clarity of tests that challenge macroscopic realism in solid‐state quantum platforms.
Quantum Coherence and Macroscopic Realism in Quantum Systems publication trend
The graph below shows the total number of articles in quantum coherence and macroscopic realism in quantum systems across all publications each year (not limited to Nature Index journals).
Technical terms
Quantum coherence: The preservation of relative phase relationships between components of a quantum superposition.
Macroscopic realism: The hypothesis that macroscopic objects possess definite properties independent of observation.
Leggett–Garg inequality: A temporal‐correlation criterion whose violation indicates incompatibility with macroscopic realism under noninvasive measurement assumptions.
Temporal correlations: Statistical dependencies between measurement outcomes at different times revealing underlying quantum dynamics.
Open quantum system: A quantum system interacting with an external environment, leading to decoherence and dissipation.
References
- Optimization of Time-Ordered Processes in the Finite and Asymptotic Regimes. PRX Quantum (2024).
- Mass-Independent Scheme to Test the Quantumness of a Massive Object. Physical Review Letters (2024).
- Witnessing environment dimension through temporal correlations. Quantum (2024).
- Quantum violation of LGI under an energy constraint for different scenarios systems. Scientific Reports (2023).
- A strict experimental test of macroscopic realism in a superconducting flux qubit. Nature Communications (2016).
About these summaries
This Nature Research Intelligence Topic summary is created with the cited references and a large language model. We take care to ground generated text with facts, and have systems in place to gain human feedback on the overall quality of the process in line with our AI principles. We strive to create accurate and useful summaries for people unfamiliar with the research topic and that supports this goal. These pages are a beta release and will be updated as we learn how best to help people gain value from a research topic summary.
Turn complex research questions into confident strategic decisions
When you're under pressure to set direction, justify investment, or understand your competitive position, you need more than raw data — you need trusted insights you can act on.
Benchmark your performance against global peers using robust, methodologically sound analysis.
Combine quantitative metrics with qualitative expert insight to uncover strengths, gaps and emerging opportunities.
Gain tailored, decision-ready recommendations aligned to your strategic priorities.
Talk to us to learn more about our data dashboards and bespoke strategy reports.
Grow research skills, confidence and careers with training built for every stage of the research lifecycle.
Developed with Nature Portfolio journal Editors and internationally renowned experts. Discover three ways to learn:
Self-paced, online courses in convenient bite-sized units, covering key skills across scientific writing, publishing, grant writing, data analysis, and more.
Expert trainer-led workshops with hands-on exercises and real-time feedback across core research skills, delivered via interactive group sessions.
Editor-led workshops combining core principles in writing and publishing, personalised 1:1 feedback from Nature Portfolio Editors and hands-on exercises.
Explore course catalogues and workshop agendas, enquire about the options or request institutional pricing.