Sarcopenia Assessment and Nutritional Interventions in Older Adults

Summary

Sarcopenia, defined as the progressive loss of skeletal muscle mass and strength with advancing age, poses a significant threat to independence and quality of life in older adults. Assessment typically combines measurement of muscle quantity—using techniques such as dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry or computed tomography—with evaluation of functional capacity, including hand-grip dynamometry, gait speed and physical performance batteries. Emerging emphasis on muscle quality integrates indices of fat infiltration and metabolic dysfunction. Nutritional interventions aim to preserve or restore muscle mass and function through optimised protein intake, energy provision and targeted micronutrients. Leucine-enriched protein supplements, vitamin D repletion and anti-inflammatory nutrients have shown promise in mitigating muscle loss. Multimodal strategies that couple resistance exercise with tailored dietary prescriptions enhance anabolic responsiveness. Implementation in diverse care settings demands user-friendly screening tools, pragmatic imaging protocols and consensus diagnostic criteria to guide timely referral and intervention. Ongoing research explores personalised nutrition based on inflammatory status, sarcopenic obesity profiles and underlying comorbidities, with the goal of reducing frailty, falls and hospitalisation worldwide.

Research from Nature Portfolio

No recent Nature Portfolio content available.

Sarcopenia Assessment and Nutritional Interventions in Older Adults publication trend

The graph below shows the total number of articles in sarcopenia assessment and nutritional interventions in older adults across all publications each year (not limited to Nature Index journals).

Technical terms

Sarcopenia: Age-related decline in skeletal muscle mass, strength and function.

Myosteatosis: Fat infiltration within muscle tissue that impairs muscle quality.

Sarcopenic obesity: Coexistence of reduced muscle mass with excess adipose tissue.

Appendicular lean mass: Combined lean tissue mass of arms and legs, typically adjusted for height.

GLIM criteria: Consensus diagnostic framework requiring one phenotypic and one aetiologic criterion for malnutrition.

References

  1. Myosteatosis is closely associated with sarcopenia and significantly worse outcomes in patients with cirrhosis. Journal of Hepatology (2024).
  2. GLIM criteria for the diagnosis of malnutrition – A consensus report from the global clinical nutrition community. Journal of Cachexia Sarcopenia and Muscle (2019).
  3. Sarcopenia in daily practice: assessment and management. BMC Geriatrics (2016).

About these summaries

This Nature Research Intelligence Topic summary is created with the cited references and a large language model. We take care to ground generated text with facts, and have systems in place to gain human feedback on the overall quality of the process in line with our AI principles. We strive to create accurate and useful summaries for people unfamiliar with the research topic and that supports this goal. These pages are a beta release and will be updated as we learn how best to help people gain value from a research topic summary.

Nature Strategy Reports
Turn complex research questions into confident strategic decisions 

When you're under pressure to set direction, justify investment, or understand your competitive position, you need more than raw data — you need trusted insights you can act on.

  • Benchmark your performance against global peers using robust, methodologically sound analysis.

  • Combine quantitative metrics with qualitative expert insight to uncover strengths, gaps and emerging opportunities.

  • Gain tailored, decision-ready recommendations aligned to your strategic priorities.

Talk to us to learn more about our data dashboards and bespoke strategy reports.

Nature Masterclasses
Grow research skills, confidence and careers with training built for every stage of the research lifecycle.

Developed with Nature Portfolio journal Editors and internationally renowned experts. Discover three ways to learn:

  • Self-paced, online courses in convenient bite-sized units, covering key skills across scientific writing, publishing, grant writing, data analysis, and more.

  • Expert trainer-led workshops with hands-on exercises and real-time feedback across core research skills, delivered via interactive group sessions.

  • Editor-led workshops combining core principles in writing and publishing, personalised 1:1 feedback from Nature Portfolio Editors and hands-on exercises.

Explore course catalogues and workshop agendas, enquire about the options or request institutional pricing.