School-Based Mental Health Screening Practices
Summary
Across the globe, schools have become pivotal settings for the early identification of mental health difficulties in children and young people. School-based screening practices encompass a spectrum of approaches, from universal self-report questionnaires administered to entire cohorts, to selective assessments directed at individuals deemed at elevated risk. Such programmes seek to detect internalising problems, including anxiety and depression, as well as externalising issues such as conduct disorder and attention-deficit/hyperactivity. Advances in digital platforms enable adaptive assessments that reduce burden on pupils and staff, while allied methods—daily health observation schemes, teacher-rated risk scales and structured clinical interviews—enhance sensitivity and specificity. Implementation strategies vary, frequently integrating staff training, stakeholder engagement and clear referral pathways to mental health support. Despite demonstrated benefits in terms of early intervention and reduced long-term burden, barriers persist: concerns about consent, data privacy, the potential for stigmatisation, resource constraints and the need for culturally appropriate instruments. Current research emphasises the importance of rigorous validation, feasibility studies within diverse educational settings and the development of protocols that balance accuracy with acceptability. As policy makers and school leaders strive for equitable access, the interconnection between screening practice and systems of care remains at the forefront of efforts to safeguard pupils’ mental health.
Research from Nature Portfolio
No recent Nature Portfolio content available.
School-Based Mental Health Screening Practices publication trend
The graph below shows the total number of articles in school-based mental health screening practices across all publications each year (not limited to Nature Index journals).
Technical terms
Universal screening: The administration of brief assessments to all pupils in a defined population, regardless of risk level, to detect potential mental health difficulties early.
Selective screening: Targeted assessments directed at subgroups of pupils identified as having elevated risk factors for mental health issues.
Computerised adaptive testing (CAT): A digital assessment technique that dynamically selects items based on previous responses to maximise efficiency and precision.
Group-based trajectory modelling: A statistical method that identifies clusters of individuals following similar progressions in repeated measures over time.
Red-flag system: An automated mechanism within screening tools that highlights responses indicative of high risk, triggering further evaluation or referral.
Internalising and externalising symptoms: Categories of mental health presentation where internalising refers to inward-directed issues (e.g. anxiety, depression) and externalising to outward-directed behaviours (e.g. aggression, hyperactivity).
References
- Early detection of students’ mental health issues from a traditional daily health observation scheme in Japanese schools and its digitalization. Frontiers in Public Health (2024).
- The impact of the newly developed school-based ‘Digital Health Contact’—Evaluating a health and wellbeing screening tool for adolescents in England. PLOS ONE (2024).
- New evidence of predictive validity of SRSS-IE scores with middle and high school students. Frontiers in Education (2024).
About these summaries
This Nature Research Intelligence Topic summary is created with the cited references and a large language model. We take care to ground generated text with facts, and have systems in place to gain human feedback on the overall quality of the process in line with our AI principles. We strive to create accurate and useful summaries for people unfamiliar with the research topic and that supports this goal. These pages are a beta release and will be updated as we learn how best to help people gain value from a research topic summary.
Turn complex research questions into confident strategic decisions
When you're under pressure to set direction, justify investment, or understand your competitive position, you need more than raw data — you need trusted insights you can act on.
Benchmark your performance against global peers using robust, methodologically sound analysis.
Combine quantitative metrics with qualitative expert insight to uncover strengths, gaps and emerging opportunities.
Gain tailored, decision-ready recommendations aligned to your strategic priorities.
Talk to us to learn more about our data dashboards and bespoke strategy reports.
Grow research skills, confidence and careers with training built for every stage of the research lifecycle.
Developed with Nature Portfolio journal Editors and internationally renowned experts. Discover three ways to learn:
Self-paced, online courses in convenient bite-sized units, covering key skills across scientific writing, publishing, grant writing, data analysis, and more.
Expert trainer-led workshops with hands-on exercises and real-time feedback across core research skills, delivered via interactive group sessions.
Editor-led workshops combining core principles in writing and publishing, personalised 1:1 feedback from Nature Portfolio Editors and hands-on exercises.
Explore course catalogues and workshop agendas, enquire about the options or request institutional pricing.