Science Communication and Public Perceptions
Summary
Science communication encompasses the processes by which scientific knowledge is conveyed to non-specialist audiences, mediating between researchers, policymakers and the public. Public perceptions of science are shaped by trust in scientists, the clarity of messaging and exposure to diverse information sources. Cognitive and normative framings of scientific findings influence how lay audiences interpret evidence and form attitudes towards policy-relevant issues such as public health, climate change and emerging technologies. Perceptions are further modulated by individual-level factors—political orientation, religious beliefs and worldviews—and by societal-level dynamics including media ecosystems and cultural norms. Recent work has highlighted widespread illusions of decline in societal values, persistent albeit varied levels of trust in experts across countries and the critical role of communication strategies in sustaining confidence in scientific institutions. Understanding these interlinked processes is essential for designing interventions that foster informed decision-making and reinforce the social legitimacy of science on a global scale.
Research from Nature Portfolio
Recent studies have revealed a pervasive illusion of moral decline in many nations despite stable evidence of societal behaviours. Research attributes this misperception to biased exposure to negative information and selective memory, demonstrating that simple psychological mechanisms can generate widespread beliefs of decline. Parallel work has employed a large-scale, 68-country survey to map public trust in scientists, showing broadly high levels of confidence coupled with notable variations by region and political orientation. Respondents generally endorse greater societal engagement by scientists and value transparency in funding and evidence evaluation. Together, these findings underscore the importance of cognitive biases and cross-national differences in shaping the public’s epistemic relationships with science.
Science Communication and Public Perceptions publication trend
The graph below shows the total number of articles in science communication and public perceptions across all publications each year (not limited to Nature Index journals).
Technical terms
Normative language: Statements prescribing actions or policy recommendations based on scientific findings.
Cognitive language: Descriptions of empirical results or data without explicit behavioural guidance.
Epistemic authority: The recognised credibility or trustworthiness accorded to scientific expertise by non-specialists.
Science-related populism: Sceptical attitudes positing that scientific elites are disconnected from ordinary citizens and public values.
References
- The illusion of moral decline. Nature (2023).
- Trust in scientists and their role in society across 68 countries. Nature Human Behaviour (2025).
- Trends in US public confidence in science and opportunities for progress. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (2024).
- Perceptions of science, science communication, and climate change attitudes in 68 countries – the TISP dataset. Scientific Data (2025).
- Using Normative Language When Describing Scientific Findings: Randomized Controlled Trial of Effects on Trust and Credibility. Journal of Medical Internet Research (2023).
About these summaries
This Nature Research Intelligence Topic summary is created with the cited references and a large language model. We take care to ground generated text with facts, and have systems in place to gain human feedback on the overall quality of the process in line with our AI principles. We strive to create accurate and useful summaries for people unfamiliar with the research topic and that supports this goal. These pages are a beta release and will be updated as we learn how best to help people gain value from a research topic summary.
Turn complex research questions into confident strategic decisions
When you're under pressure to set direction, justify investment, or understand your competitive position, you need more than raw data — you need trusted insights you can act on.
Benchmark your performance against global peers using robust, methodologically sound analysis.
Combine quantitative metrics with qualitative expert insight to uncover strengths, gaps and emerging opportunities.
Gain tailored, decision-ready recommendations aligned to your strategic priorities.
Talk to us to learn more about our data dashboards and bespoke strategy reports.
Grow research skills, confidence and careers with training built for every stage of the research lifecycle.
Developed with Nature Portfolio journal Editors and internationally renowned experts. Discover three ways to learn:
Self-paced, online courses in convenient bite-sized units, covering key skills across scientific writing, publishing, grant writing, data analysis, and more.
Expert trainer-led workshops with hands-on exercises and real-time feedback across core research skills, delivered via interactive group sessions.
Editor-led workshops combining core principles in writing and publishing, personalised 1:1 feedback from Nature Portfolio Editors and hands-on exercises.
Explore course catalogues and workshop agendas, enquire about the options or request institutional pricing.