Social Networks in Entrepreneurial Ecosystems

Entrepreneurial ecosystems are dynamic constellations of actors—founders, investors, mentors, institutions and supporting organisations—interacting through diverse social networks. These networks enable the circulation of knowledge, the mobilisation of resources and the formation of collaborative partnerships that underpin venture creation and growth. Network structures such as density, centrality and the presence of structural holes influence how quickly information spreads, how trust is established and how opportunities are identified. The balance between bonding ties, which foster deep trust among closely connected actors, and bridging ties, which link across more heterogeneous groups, determines an ecosystem’s innovative capacity and resilience. Mature ecosystems often exhibit dense clusters around leading firms and research institutions, while emerging ecosystems rely heavily on bridging connections to international markets. Digital platforms and co-working spaces have widened access to networks, reducing geographical barriers and accelerating ecosystem development. Understanding these social architectures is essential for policymakers and practitioners seeking to design interventions that enhance regional competitiveness, foster inclusive growth and support sustainable entrepreneurship worldwide.

Research from Nature Portfolio

No recent Nature Portfolio content available.

Social Networks in Entrepreneurial Ecosystems publication trend

The graph below shows the total number of articles in social networks in entrepreneurial ecosystems across all publications each year (not limited to Nature Index journals).

Technical terms

Entrepreneurial ecosystem: A networked environment of actors and institutions supporting venture creation and growth through interactions and resource exchanges.

Social capital: The resources—information, trust and support—derived from an individual’s or organisation’s network connections.

Bonding social capital: Strong ties among homogeneous actors, fostering trust and mutual support but often limiting diversity of information.

Bridging social capital: Weak ties that connect heterogeneous actors, providing access to novel ideas and external resources.

Network density: The ratio of actual connections to potential connections in a network, indicating how closely actors are interlinked.

Structural hole: A gap between clusters in a network where an actor can broker information and gain competitive advantage.

References

1. Impacts of startup founders’ personal and business networks on fundraising success by mediating fundraising opportunities: Moderating role of firm age. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity (2023).
2. Connecting content and structure: A review of mechanisms in entrepreneurs’ social networks. International Journal of Management Reviews (2021).
3. Understanding the Impact of Social Capital on Entrepreneurship Performance: The Moderation Effects of Opportunity Recognition and Operational Competency. Frontiers in Psychology (2021).