Surgical Outcomes in Elderly Gastric Cancer Patients

Summary

Surgical management of gastric cancer in patients aged 65 years or older presents unique challenges owing to age-related physiological decline, increased comorbidity burden and varying degrees of frailty. Contemporary series demonstrate that curative gastrectomy can achieve comparable long-term survival in selected elderly individuals when perioperative assessment and tailored surgical strategies are employed. Minimally invasive approaches, such as laparoscopic gastrectomy, are associated with reduced blood loss, faster recovery and lower complication rates, yet often involve longer operating times. The extent of lymphadenectomy must balance oncological benefit against the risk of postoperative pneumonia and other morbidities in frail patients. Adjuvant chemotherapy confers survival advantage even in octogenarians, provided that treatment tolerance is carefully evaluated. Multidisciplinary care incorporating comprehensive geriatric assessment, optimisation of comorbid conditions and early mobilisation programmes underpins safe recovery and improves overall survival outcomes globally.

Research from Nature Portfolio

Emerging evidence indicates that sex differences influence postoperative complications and survival after gastrectomy in elderly cohorts. In one large series of patients aged 75 years or older undergoing curative resection, male sex emerged as an independent risk factor for both postoperative morbidity and poorer prognosis. Upper-third tumour location and higher incidence of comorbidities among men contributed to these findings. Crucially, patients at high risk of complications demonstrated improved three-year survival when undergoing limited rather than standard lymphadenectomy, suggesting that personalised surgical extent can mitigate adverse outcomes in vulnerable subgroups.

Surgical Outcomes in Elderly Gastric Cancer Patients publication trend

The graph below shows the total number of articles in surgical outcomes in elderly gastric cancer patients across all publications each year (not limited to Nature Index journals).

Technical terms

Gastrectomy: Surgical removal of part or all of the stomach.

D2 lymphadenectomy: Extended removal of perigastric and adjacent lymph nodes during gastrectomy.

Comorbidity index: A scoring system that quantifies additional diseases or conditions affecting patient prognosis.

Propensity score matching: A statistical method used to balance patient characteristics between treatment groups in observational studies.

Clavien–Dindo classification: A system for grading the severity of postoperative complications.

References

  1. Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Older Patients with Gastric Cancer: A Population-Based Cohort Study. Cancers (2023).
  2. Differences of clinical features and outcomes between male and female elderly patients in gastric cancer. Scientific Reports (2023).
  3. Gastrıc cancer surgery in elderly patients: promising results from a mid-western population. BMC Geriatrics (2023).
  4. Laparoscopic gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy for elderly patients with gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World Journal of Surgical Oncology (2016).
Nature Strategy Reports
Turn complex research questions into confident strategic decisions 

When you're under pressure to set direction, justify investment, or understand your competitive position, you need more than raw data — you need trusted insights you can act on.

  • Benchmark your performance against global peers using robust, methodologically sound analysis.

  • Combine quantitative metrics with qualitative expert insight to uncover strengths, gaps and emerging opportunities.

  • Gain tailored, decision-ready recommendations aligned to your strategic priorities.

Talk to us to learn more about our data dashboards and bespoke strategy reports.

Nature Masterclasses
Grow research skills, confidence and careers with training built for every stage of the research lifecycle.

Developed with Nature Portfolio journal Editors and internationally renowned experts. Discover three ways to learn:

  • Self-paced, online courses in convenient bite-sized units, covering key skills across scientific writing, publishing, grant writing, data analysis, and more.

  • Expert trainer-led workshops with hands-on exercises and real-time feedback across core research skills, delivered via interactive group sessions.

  • Editor-led workshops combining core principles in writing and publishing, personalised 1:1 feedback from Nature Portfolio Editors and hands-on exercises.

Explore course catalogues and workshop agendas, enquire about the options or request institutional pricing.