Tax Compliance Behavior and Motivational Factors

Tax compliance represents the voluntary or enforced fulfilment of fiscal obligations by individuals and businesses and is shaped by a complex interplay of deterrence measures, intrinsic motivations and institutional trust. Theoretical frameworks emphasise that compliance arises not only from fear of sanctions but also from perceptions of fairness, social norms and the legitimacy of tax authorities. Behavioural interventions, such as informational nudges and simplification of communications, leverage cognitive biases to improve payment rates, while coercive measures—audits, penalties and legal enforcement—serve as deterrents. Trust in authorities underpins tax morale, fostering a climate in which citizens believe that public revenues are managed transparently. Digitalisation of tax systems further influences compliance by altering the perceived effort of reporting and the immediacy of feedback. Across jurisdictions, engagement strategies that balance power and legitimacy and that appeal to both self-interest and public-spirited motivations have proved most effective. The global significance of these insights is evident in their application to widening tax bases, reducing evasion and optimising revenue collection in both advanced and developing economies.

Research from Nature Portfolio

No recent Nature Portfolio content available.

Tax Compliance Behavior and Motivational Factors publication trend

The graph below shows the total number of articles in tax compliance behavior and motivational factors across all publications each year (not limited to Nature Index journals).

Technical terms

Tax compliance: The degree to which taxpayers correctly report income, calculate liabilities and pay taxes owed in accordance with legal requirements.

Coercive power: Authority’s capacity to enforce compliance through audits, penalties, legal sanctions and strict monitoring procedures.

Legitimate power: Authority’s capacity to foster voluntary cooperation through transparent processes, assistance and perceived fairness.

Social norms: Shared beliefs within a reference group about appropriate tax-paying behaviour that influence individual decisions via peer effects.

Nudge: A subtle change in choice architecture or communication designed to steer behaviour without mandating outcomes or altering economic incentives.

Audit effectiveness: The proportion of undeclared income detected during an audit and its consequent impact on future reporting behaviour.

Tax morale: Intrinsic motivation to pay taxes based on civic duty, ethical considerations and confidence in governance.

Slippery Slope Framework: A theoretical model positing that compliance results from the dynamic interplay between power of authorities and taxpayers’ trust in those authorities.

References

1. Nudges and threats: soft versus hard incentives for tax compliance. Economic Policy (2023).
2. Tax authorities' interaction with taxpayers: A conception of compliance in social dilemmas by power and trust. New Ideas in Psychology (2015).
3. How best to nudge taxpayers? The impact of message simplification and descriptive social norms on payment rates in a central London local authority. Journal of Behavioral Public Administration (2018).
4. Audits, audit effectiveness, and post-audit tax compliance. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization (2022).
5. The mediating role of adoption of an electronic tax system in the relationship between attitude towards electronic tax system and tax compliance. Journal of Economics Finance and Administrative Science (2019).