User Acceptance of Biometric Payment Technologies

Summary

User acceptance of biometric payment technologies hinges on how individuals perceive the balance of convenience, security and privacy when using unique physiological or behavioural traits to authenticate transactions. As financial services integrate fingerprint, facial, iris and palm‐vein recognition into ATMs, point‐of‐sale terminals and mobile applications, research has explored factors that drive or hinder uptake. Perceived usefulness and ease of use remain central, while trust in the technology and its providers, concerns over data privacy, and perceived risks—financial, physical or reputational—shape users’ attitudes. Demographic attributes such as age, education and technology familiarity, along with cultural and contextual influences, further moderate acceptance. The COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated interest in contactless options, highlighting hygiene and convenience benefits but also magnifying anxieties around biometric data storage and misuse. Through theoretical lenses such as the Technology Acceptance Model and extensions incorporating privacy and trust constructs, studies reveal how positive drivers (security, speed, hygiene) and inhibitors (privacy invasion, error rates) combine to influence adoption and continued use worldwide.

Research from Nature Portfolio

No recent Nature Portfolio content available.

User Acceptance of Biometric Payment Technologies publication trend

The graph below shows the total number of articles in user acceptance of biometric payment technologies across all publications each year (not limited to Nature Index journals).

Technical terms

Biometric authentication: The verification of identity using unique biological or behavioural characteristics.

Perceived value: The user’s overall assessment of the benefit derived from a technology compared with its cost or risk.

Continuance intention: The user’s intention to continue using a technology after initial adoption.

Net valence framework: An analytical approach weighing positive and negative factors to predict technology acceptance.

Technology Acceptance Model: A theoretical model positing that perceived usefulness and ease of use govern technology adoption.

References

  1. Net valence analysis of iris recognition technology-based FinTech. Financial Innovation (2024).
  2. Disentangling facial recognition payment service usage behavior: A trust perspective. Telematics and Informatics (2023).
  3. Determinants of consumer adoption of biometric technologies in mobile financial applications. Economics and Business Review (2024).

About these summaries

This Nature Research Intelligence Topic summary is created with the cited references and a large language model. We take care to ground generated text with facts, and have systems in place to gain human feedback on the overall quality of the process in line with our AI principles. We strive to create accurate and useful summaries for people unfamiliar with the research topic and that supports this goal. These pages are a beta release and will be updated as we learn how best to help people gain value from a research topic summary.

Nature Strategy Reports
Turn complex research questions into confident strategic decisions 

When you're under pressure to set direction, justify investment, or understand your competitive position, you need more than raw data — you need trusted insights you can act on.

  • Benchmark your performance against global peers using robust, methodologically sound analysis.

  • Combine quantitative metrics with qualitative expert insight to uncover strengths, gaps and emerging opportunities.

  • Gain tailored, decision-ready recommendations aligned to your strategic priorities.

Talk to us to learn more about our data dashboards and bespoke strategy reports.

Nature Masterclasses
Grow research skills, confidence and careers with training built for every stage of the research lifecycle.

Developed with Nature Portfolio journal Editors and internationally renowned experts. Discover three ways to learn:

  • Self-paced, online courses in convenient bite-sized units, covering key skills across scientific writing, publishing, grant writing, data analysis, and more.

  • Expert trainer-led workshops with hands-on exercises and real-time feedback across core research skills, delivered via interactive group sessions.

  • Editor-led workshops combining core principles in writing and publishing, personalised 1:1 feedback from Nature Portfolio Editors and hands-on exercises.

Explore course catalogues and workshop agendas, enquire about the options or request institutional pricing.