User Resistance and Acceptance in Information Technology Systems

Summary

User resistance and acceptance in information technology systems concern the behavioural and cognitive responses of individuals and organisations when new digital tools are introduced. Researchers have long employed theoretical frameworks such as the Technology Acceptance Model and Innovation Resistance Theory to identify factors that encourage or impede uptake. Core determinants include perceived usefulness and ease of use, social influence, self-efficacy and cognitive biases such as status quo bias. Organisational dimensions—such as leadership support, training provision, trialability of the system and the clarity of communication—shape collective responses. Empirical work frequently combines qualitative interviews with quantitative surveys and structural equation modelling to unpack how performance expectancy and perceived value relate to adoption intention. A growing body of evidence highlights that multi-stakeholder engagement, iterative prototyping and targeted interventions (for example enactive mastery experiences) can mitigate resistance and foster sustained usage. These insights carry global significance, informing implementation strategies in sectors such as healthcare, manufacturing, extended reality and the Internet of Things, and underscore the importance of tailoring change management to both micro-level user concerns and macro-level institutional pressures.

Research from Nature Portfolio

No recent Nature Portfolio content available.

User Resistance and Acceptance in Information Technology Systems publication trend

The graph below shows the total number of articles in user resistance and acceptance in information technology systems across all publications each year (not limited to Nature Index journals).

Technical terms

Resistance to Change: A tendency to oppose or avoid alterations in workplace processes or technologies.

Technology Acceptance Model: A framework positing that perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use govern behavioural intention to use a system.

Perceived Usefulness: The degree to which an individual believes that using a particular system will enhance their job performance.

Trialability: The extent to which an innovation can be experimented with on a limited basis before full adoption.

Status Quo Bias: A cognitive preference for maintaining existing conditions over change, often leading to inertia in technology adoption.

References

  1. Effect of user resistance on the organizational adoption of extended reality technologies: A mixed methods study. International Journal of Information Management (2024).
  2. Resistance of multiple stakeholders to e-health innovations: Integration of fundamental insights and guiding research paths. Journal of Business Research (2023).
  3. Unfolding IoT Adoption: A Status Quo Bias Perspective. Business & Information Systems Engineering (2024).
  4. Enactive mastery experience improves attitudes towards digital technology via self-efficacy – a pre-registered quasi-experiment. Behaviour and Information Technology (2023).

About these summaries

This Nature Research Intelligence Topic summary is created with the cited references and a large language model. We take care to ground generated text with facts, and have systems in place to gain human feedback on the overall quality of the process in line with our AI principles. We strive to create accurate and useful summaries for people unfamiliar with the research topic and that supports this goal. These pages are a beta release and will be updated as we learn how best to help people gain value from a research topic summary.

Nature Strategy Reports
Turn complex research questions into confident strategic decisions 

When you're under pressure to set direction, justify investment, or understand your competitive position, you need more than raw data — you need trusted insights you can act on.

  • Benchmark your performance against global peers using robust, methodologically sound analysis.

  • Combine quantitative metrics with qualitative expert insight to uncover strengths, gaps and emerging opportunities.

  • Gain tailored, decision-ready recommendations aligned to your strategic priorities.

Talk to us to learn more about our data dashboards and bespoke strategy reports.

Nature Masterclasses
Grow research skills, confidence and careers with training built for every stage of the research lifecycle.

Developed with Nature Portfolio journal Editors and internationally renowned experts. Discover three ways to learn:

  • Self-paced, online courses in convenient bite-sized units, covering key skills across scientific writing, publishing, grant writing, data analysis, and more.

  • Expert trainer-led workshops with hands-on exercises and real-time feedback across core research skills, delivered via interactive group sessions.

  • Editor-led workshops combining core principles in writing and publishing, personalised 1:1 feedback from Nature Portfolio Editors and hands-on exercises.

Explore course catalogues and workshop agendas, enquire about the options or request institutional pricing.