Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Substrate recognition and cleavage mechanism of the monkeypox virus core protease

Abstract

Poxviruses cause severe diseases, including smallpox and mpox, that pose major threats to human health. The poxvirus core protease (CorePro) is essential for viral maturation and is highly conserved in poxviruses, making it an attractive antiviral target1. However, the structure of CorePro remains unknown, hampering antiviral development. Here we determined the apo structure of monkeypox virus (MPXV) CorePro and the structure of CorePro in a complex with the inhibitor aloxistatin, a drug candidate for muscular dystrophy2. These structures show that CorePro forms a homodimer that features a unique ‘dancing couple’ fold. The catalytic intermediate state of CorePro was characterized by an aldehyde derivative from a natural substrate (I-G18). This derivative binds covalently to the catalytic Cys328, shifting the active site of the viral protease from a closed conformation in the apo form to a favourable open conformation upon substrate binding. On the basis of the CoreProI-G18 complex, we designed a series of peptidomimetic inhibitors with a nitrile warhead, which could covalently anchor with the catalytic Cys328. These compounds inhibit CorePro with half-maximal inhibitory concentrations of 44.9–100.3 nM, and exhibit potent and broad anti-poxvirus activity. Our studies provide a basis for designing wide-spectrum inhibitors against poxvirus infections.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Cryo-EM structure of MPXV CorePro in the apo form.
Fig. 2: Structural basis of aloxistatin binding to MPXV CorePro.
Fig. 3: Cryo-EM structure of MPXV CorePro in complex with the nonapeptide I-G18.
Fig. 4: Design strategy, structure–activity relationship and inhibition mechanism of the peptidomimetic inhibitors.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and the Supplementary Information files. Detailed information for compounds A1A6, including 1H, 13C and 19F-NMR, high-resolution mass spectra (HRMS) and HPLC spectra results are shown in the Supplementary Information. The 3D cryo-EM density maps of CorePro in its apo form (EMDB-61300) and in complexes with aloxistatin (EMDB-62516), I-G18 (EMDB-62520), A1 (EMDB-61292), A3 (EMDB-61293) and A4 (EMDB-61294) have been deposited in the Electron Microscopy Data Bank (EMDB) database. The atomic models of CorePro in its apo form (9JAQ) and in complexes with aloxistatin (9KQV), I-G18 (9KR6), A1 (9JAL), A3 (9JAM) and A4 (9JAN) have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank (PDB). Additionally, the atomic models by X-ray crystallography of MPXV CorePro(I215K) (9KU9) and the catalytic domain of TATV CorePro (9KU2) have been deposited in the PDB. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. Byrd, C. M. & Hruby, D. E. Vaccinia virus proteolysis—a review. Rev. Med. Virol. 16, 187–202 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Satoyoshi, E. Therapeutic trials on progressive muscular dystrophy. Intern. Med. 31, 841–846 (1992).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Taube, J. C., Rest, E. C., Lloyd-Smith, J. O. & Bansal, S. The global landscape of smallpox vaccination history and implications for current and future orthopoxvirus susceptibility: a modelling study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 23, 454–462 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. World Health Organization. Global Mpox Trends; https://worldhealthorg.shinyapps.io/mpx_global/ (2025).

  5. Deputy, N. P. et al. Vaccine effectiveness of JYNNEOS against Mpox disease in the United States. N. Engl. J. Med. 388, 2434–2443 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Liu, H. et al. Global perspectives on smallpox vaccine against monkeypox: a comprehensive meta-analysis and systematic review of effectiveness, protection, safety and cross-immunogenicity. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 13, 2387442 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Lenharo, M. Hopes dashed for drug aimed at monkeypox virus spreading in Africa. Nature 632, 965 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lum, F.-M. et al. Monkeypox: disease epidemiology, host immunity and clinical interventions. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 22, 597–613 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Lu, L., Su, S., Yang, H. & Jiang, S. Antivirals with common targets against highly pathogenic viruses. Cell 184, 1604–1620 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Owen, D. R. et al. An oral SARS-CoV-2 Mpro inhibitor clinical candidate for the treatment of COVID-19. Science 374, 1586–1593 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Schuele, L. et al. Real-time PCR assay to detect the novel clade Ib monkeypox virus, September 2023 to May 2024. Eurosurveillance 29, 2400486 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Kane, E. M. & Shuman, S. Vaccinia virus morphogenesis is blocked by a temperature-sensitive mutation in the I7 gene that encodes a virion component. J. Virol. 67, 2689–2698 (1993).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Ericsson, M. et al. Characterization of ts 16, a temperature-sensitive mutant of vaccinia virus. J. Virol. 69, 7072–7086 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Holm, L. Dali server: structural unification of protein families. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, W210–W215 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Pruneda, J. N. et al. The molecular basis for ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like specificities in bacterial effector proteases. Mol. Cell 63, 261–276 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Reverter, D. & Lima, C. D. A basis for SUMO protease specificity provided by analysis of human Senp2 and a Senp2–SUMO complex. Structure 12, 1519–1531 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Byrd, C. M., Bolken, T. C. & Hruby, D. E. Molecular dissection of the vaccinia virus I7L core protein proteinase. J. Virol. 77, 11279–11283 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Navia, M. A. et al. Three-dimensional structure of aspartyl protease from human immunodeficiency virus HIV-1. Nature 337, 615–620 (1989).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Wlodawer, A. et al. Conserved folding in retroviral proteases: crystal structure of synthetic HIV-1 protease. Science 245, 616–621 (1989).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Jin, Z. et al. Structure of Mpro from SARS-CoV-2 and discovery of its inhibitors. Nature 582, 289–293 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Qiu, X. et al. Unique fold and active site in cytomegalovirus protease. Nature 383, 275–279 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Shieh, H.-S. et al. Three-dimensional structure of human cytomegalovirus protease. Nature 383, 279–282 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Tong, L. et al. A new serine-protease fold revealed by the crystal structure of human cytomegalovirus protease. Nature 383, 272–275 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Yang, G. et al. An orally bioavailable antipoxvirus compound (ST-246) inhibits extracellular virus formation and protects mice from lethal orthopoxvirus challenge. J. Virol. 79, 13139–13149 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Tamai, M. et al. In vitro and in vivo inhibition of cysteine proteinases by EST, a new analog of E-64. J. Pharmacobiodyn. 9, 672–677 (1986).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hook, G., Jacobsen, J. S., Grabstein, K., Kindy, M. & Hook, V. Cathepsin B is a new drug target for traumatic brain injury therapeutics: evidence for E64d as a promising lead drug candidate. Front. Neurol. 6, 178 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Hook, G., Hook, V. & Kindy, M. The cysteine protease inhibitor, E64d, reduces brain amyloid-beta and improves memory deficits in Alzheimer’s disease animal models by inhibiting cathepsin B, but not BACE1, beta-secretase activity. J. Alzheimers Dis. 26, 387–408 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Hook, G., Yu, J., Toneff, T., Kindy, M. & Hook, V. Brain pyroglutamate amyloid-beta is produced by cathepsin B and is reduced by the cysteine protease inhibitor E64d, representing a potential Alzheimer’s disease therapeutic. J. Alzheimers Dis. 41, 129–149 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Setoyama, K. et al. Toxicological studies of ethyl (+)-(2S,3S)-3-[(S)-3-methyl-1-(3-methylbutylcarbamoyl) butylcarbamoyl]-2-oxiranecarboxylate (EST) (report 1): acute toxicity studies of EST and metabolite and by-product of EST. Iyakuhin Kenkyu 17, 736–743 (1986).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Aleshin, A. E. et al. Activity, specificity, and probe design for the smallpox virus protease K7L. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 39470–39479 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Veber, D. F. et al. Molecular properties that influence the oral bioavailability of drug candidates. J. Med. Chem. 45, 2615–2623 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Nomura, A. M., Marnett, A. B., Shimba, N., Dötsch, V. & Craik, C. S. Induced structure of a helical switch as a mechanism to regulate enzymatic activity. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 12, 1019–1020 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Marnett, A. B., Nomura, A. M., Shimba, N., de Montellano, P. R. O. & Craik, C. S. Communication between the active sites and dimer interface of a herpesvirus protease revealed by a transition-state inhibitor. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 6870–6875 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. Erbel, P. et al. Structural basis for the activation of flaviviral NS3 proteases from dengue and West Nile virus. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 13, 372–373 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kim, J. L. et al. Crystal structure of the hepatitis C virus NS3 protease domain complexed with a synthetic NS4A cofactor peptide. Cell 87, 343–355 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Love, R. A. et al. The crystal structure of hepatitis C virus NS3 proteinase reveals a trypsin-like fold and a structural zinc binding site. Cell 87, 331–342 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Ronau, J. A., Beckmann, J. F. & Hochstrasser, M. Substrate specificity of the ubiquitin and Ubl proteases. Cell Res. 26, 441–456 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Mastronarde, D. N. Automated electron microscope tomography using robust prediction of specimen movements. J. Struct. Biol. 152, 36–51 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Scheres, S. H. W. A Bayesian view on cryo-EM structure determination. J. Mol. Biol. 415, 406–418 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Punjani, A., Rubinstein, J. L., Fleet, D. J. & Brubaker, M. A. cryoSPARC: algorithms for rapid unsupervised cryo-EM structure determination. Nat. Methods 14, 290–296 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Punjani, A., Zhang, H. & Fleet, D. J. Non-uniform refinement: adaptive regularization improves single-particle cryo-EM reconstruction. Nat. Methods 17, 1214–1221 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 486–501 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  ADS  Google Scholar 

  43. Jumper, J. et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596, 583–589 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  ADS  Google Scholar 

  44. Liebschner, D. et al. Macromolecular structure determination using X-rays, neutrons and electrons: recent developments in Phenix. Acta Crystallogr. D 75, 861–877 (2019).

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  45. Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF Chimera—a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1605–1612 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Rosenthal, P. B. & Henderson, R. Optimal determination of particle orientation, absolute hand, and contrast loss in single-particle electron cryomicroscopy. J. Mol. Biol. 333, 721–745 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Kabsch, W. XDS. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 125–132 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  ADS  Google Scholar 

  48. Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF ChimeraX: structure visualization for researchers, educators, and developers. Protein Sci. 30, 70–82 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Bio-Electron Microscopy Facility of ShanghaiTech University for technical support; the campus service team of ShanghaiTech University, scientific research platform of Shanghai Institute for Advanced Immunochemical Studies (SIAIS) and National Facility for Protein Science in Shanghai, as well as the managers and technicians who provided onsite or remote technical support; and the staff at the BL10U2 at Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility (SSRF, China), where data were collected. This work was supported by grants from Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Major Project (grant ZD2021CY001 to H.Y.); the Chinese Ministry of Education; Lingang Laboratory (grant LG202101-01-07 to H.Y.); the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grants 82130105, 82121005 and 92253305 to H.L. and grant 81902063 to W.W.); the Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (grant XDB0490000 to L.Z.); the Hubei Natural Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars (grant 2022CFA099 to L.Z.); the Chongqing Science and Technology Bureau (grant CSTB2024NSCQ-MSX0391 to W.W.); the Chongqing Municipal Education Commission (grant KJQN202400433 to W.W.); the Shanghai Rising Star Program (grant 23QA1406400 to Y.G.); the Joint Funds of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant U22A20379 to W.D.); the Postdoctoral Fellowship Program and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (grants BX20240374 and 2024M753225 to H.W.); and Shanghai Frontiers Science Center for Biomacromolecules and Precision Medicine of ShanghaiTech University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

H.Y., H.L. and Z.R. conceived, initiated and coordinated the project. X.Z., T.Y., H.W., D.L., X.D., W.C., J.X., X.L., H.Z., S.M., H.J., M.J. and Z.S. purified the protein. Y.G., W.L., W.H. and M.Z. collected the cryo-EM data. Y.G. and W.L. processed cryo-EM data. Y.G. and W.W. built and refined the structure models. X.D. and D.L. identified and optimized the crystallization condition. H.W., W.W., Y.G. and X.J. collected X-ray diffraction data and determined the crystal structures. H.L., X.X., W.D., S.H. and B.W. designed and synthesized the peptidomimetic inhibitors. L.Z., J.C., Y.X., W.S. and Y.Z. performed the cell-based antiviral and cytotoxicity assays. X.Z., T.Y. and J.X. performed the enzymatic activity assay. H.Y., Z.R., H.L., L.Z., Y.G., X.X., T.Y., W.W., J.C., X.Z., Y.Y., Y.D., K.Y., X.J., X.Y., G.X. and B.Y. analysed and discussed the data. The manuscript was written by Y.G., W.W., X.X., J.C., H.C.N. and H.Y. All authors discussed the experiments and results, and read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Wei Wang, Leike Zhang, Zihe Rao, Hong Liu or Haitao Yang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature thanks Yi Shi and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Fig. 1 Phylogenetic and conservation analysis of orthopoxvirus core proteases.

a, Amino acid sequence alignment of core proteases from the orthopoxviruses that infect humans. Conserved residues are shaded. Residues close to the active site are boxed and labeled. b, The positions of the residues that are not fully conserved are shown as red spheres on the structure of MPXV CorePro. The positions of the catalytic triad residues are shown as yellow spheres.

Extended Data Fig. 2 Representative protein purifications and enzymatic activities of MPXV and VARV CorePro.

a, MPXV CorePro eluted at ~13.2 mL on a Superdex 200 increase size-exclusion column, corresponding to a molecular weight between 67–158 kDa. The purity as judged by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) was >90%. b, MPXV CorePro cleaved a fluorescent substrate S-G32 derived from the second cleavage site of MPXV protein P25K. c, VARV CorePro is also a dimer and d, cleaves S-G32. AU is the abbreviation for arbitrary unit. The enzymatic activity data were derived from n = 4 biological replicates and are presented as mean values ± s.d.

Source Data

Extended Data Fig. 3 Data process of MPXV CorePro in the apo-form and in complex with aloxistatin, I-G18, A1, A3 and A4.

a, Representative electron micrograph of the cryo-EM sample and CTF fit of the corresponding micrograph. b, Representative 2D classification averages calculated from selected particles. c, Workflow of the data processing. The overall map is colored according to the local resolution. d, Fourier shell correlation (FSC) curves of 3D reconstructions. e, Viewing direction of all particles used in the final 3D reconstruction. f, 3D FSC histogram of final map. g, Map to model FSC. The dotted line indicates FSC 0.143.

Extended Data Fig. 4 Purification and enzymatic activities of CorePro variants.

a, TATV CorePro and c, MPXV CorePro I215K eluted as a single peak on size-exclusion chromatography. The purity as judged by SDS-PAGE was >90%. TATV CorePro and MPXV CorePro I215K were in the right lane of the corresponding SDS-PAGEs; the left lanes were WT MPXV CorePro. Both b, TATV CorePro and d, MPXV CorePro I215K cleaved S-G32, a fluorescent substrate derived from the second cleavage site of MPXV protein P25K. e, MPXV CorePro D258A and g, D248A eluted on a Superdex 200 increase size-exclusion column. The purity as judged by SDS-PAGE was >90%. Neither f, MPXV CorePro D258A nor h, D248A was able to cleave S-G32. i, A MPXV CorePro variant, which consists of residues 1–405, eluted as a single peak on Superdex 75 Increase size-exclusion column and demonstrated >90% purity on SDS-PAGE, and j, did not cleave S-G32. AU is the abbreviation for arbitrary unit. The enzymatic activity data in b and d were derived from n = 4 biological replicates and are presented as mean values ± s.d.

Source Data

Extended Data Fig. 5 The quality assessments of cryo-EM maps.

Cryo-EM densities for the indicated regions are shown: a, residues surrounding the active site of MPXV CorePro in the apo-form (Threshold: 0.4), the aloxistatin binding region (Threshold: 0.4), and the I-G18 binding region (Threshold: 0.6); b, The dimer interface of MPXV CorePro in the apo-form (Threshold: 0.7); c, Residues from Asn321 to Cys328 of MPXV CorePro in the apo-form and in complex with aloxistatin (Threshold: 0.4); d, The regions that can only be traced in CorePro-I-G18 complex (Threshold: 0.45). The structures of MPXV CorePro in the apo-form, in complex with aloxistatin and in complex with I-G18 are in gray, dark slate blue, and forest green, respectively. The cryo-EM densities are shown as grey with 40% transparency. The residues showing densities are labelled nearby.

Extended Data Fig. 6 Structures and cartoon diagrams of representative viral proteases illustrate their dimerization mode.

The representative viral proteases are from a, MPXV (PDB: 9JAQ), b, SARS-CoV-2 (PDB: 6M03), c, HCMV (PDB: 1WPO), d, HIV-1 (PDB: 1AID), e, HCV (PDB: 1A1R) and f, Zika virus (PDB: 5GPI).

Extended Data Fig. 7 Inhibition efficacy of aloxistatin and the peptidomimetic inhibitors.

a, Inhibiton activities of aloxistatin against MPXV CorePro and VARV CorePro, as well as compounds A1-A2 against MPXV CorePro. Each sample was tested in n = 4 biologically independent replicates and data are presented as mean values ± s.d. b, Representative curves showing VACV inhibition activity (black curves) and cell toxicity (blue curves) of aloxistatin and compounds A2-A6 in HeLa cell culture systems, and MPXV inhibition activity (black curves) and cell toxicity (blue curves) of aloxistatin in Vero-E6 cells. Data are presented as mean values ± s.d. from at least two technical repeats. EC50 values are expressed as mean values ± s.d. from at least n = 3 biologically independent replicates.

Extended Data Fig. 8 Cryo-EM structures of MPXV CorePro in complex with compound A1 and A4.

a, Cryo-EM map of MPXV CorePro in complex with compound A1 (Threshold 0.4). The CorePro domains, CD, NTD and CTD are in green, blue and red/orange, respectively. A1 is depicted in deep pink. Zoomed-in view of CorePro in complex with A1 is shown on the right. A1 is represented as sticks, accompanied by a local density map (Threshold 0.32). b, Depiction of the interactions between A1 and CorePro. c, Cryo-EM map of MPXV CorePro in complex with compound A4 (Threshold 0.4). A4 is depicted in pink. The local density map of A4 on the right is set to 0.35. d, Depiction of the interactions between A4 and CorePro.

Source Data

Extended Data Table 1 Statistics of cryo-EM data collection, image processing, and refinement
Extended Data Table 2 Statistics of X-ray data collection, image processing, and refinement

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains Supplementary Methods, Supplementary Figs. 1–8, Supplementary Scheme 1 and Supplementary Tables 1 and 2.

Reporting Summary

Source data

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gao, Y., Xie, X., Zhang, X. et al. Substrate recognition and cleavage mechanism of the monkeypox virus core protease. Nature 643, 271–279 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09014-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09014-x

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing: Translational Research

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Translational Research newsletter — top stories in biotechnology, drug discovery and pharma.

Get what matters in translational research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Translational Research