Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Nature Communications
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. nature communications
  3. articles
  4. article
Vacuum-induced interfacial compaction for scalable fabrication of high-performance organic solar cells
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 14 March 2026

Vacuum-induced interfacial compaction for scalable fabrication of high-performance organic solar cells

  • Siying Wang1 na1,
  • Ruxue Ding1 na1,
  • Ziyang Zhang1,
  • Yawei Liu2,
  • Jiarui Wang3,
  • Jiali Weng4,
  • Yao Zhao  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-0613-87082,
  • Jianqi Zhang  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-3549-14825,
  • Zihao Xu  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-0805-85332,
  • Zheng Tang  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-0036-23624,
  • Yunhao Cai  ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0009-8822-655X1 &
  • …
  • Hui Huang  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-6102-28151,3 

Nature Communications , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 4265 Accesses

  • 1 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Solar cells
  • Solar energy and photovoltaic technology

Abstract

Organic solar cells hold great promise for next-generation photovoltaics, yet their practical deployment is impeded by intrinsic morphological and interfacial limitations that compromise device performance and stability. Herein, we introduce a vacuum-induced interfacial compaction strategy that forms smooth, compact, and strongly adhered multilayer films without conventional thermal or solvent annealing, by promoting dense stacking, suppressing interfacial voids, and improving overall interfacial integrity. Consequently, corresponding devices achieve power conversion efficiencies of 20.51% for rigid and 19.13% for flexible devices, together with a high yield. Notably, device with an active area of 1.0 cm2 and a module with an area of 15.7 cm2 fabricated with this strategy deliver efficiencies of 19.04% and 17.48%, respectively. Upon further scaling the module area to 67.2 cm2, a high efficiency of 15.37% is still attained. These results establish the vacuum-induced interfacial compaction strategy as a feasible route toward durable, high-performance organic solar cells.

Similar content being viewed by others

Numerical simulation based performance enhancement approach for an inorganic BaZrS3/CuO heterojunction solar cell

Article Open access 31 March 2024

Imaging and quantifying non-radiative losses at 23% efficient inverted perovskite solar cells interfaces

Article Open access 23 May 2022

SCAPS simulation of novel inorganic ZrS2/CuO heterojunction solar cells

Article Open access 20 March 2023

Data availability

The data generated in this study are provided in the Source Data file published alongside this paper. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. Ma, R. et al. Organic solar cells: beyond 20%. Sci. China Mater. 68, 1689–1701 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Balasubramanian, K. et al. Neural network-based Bluetooth synchronization of multiple wearable devices. Nat. Commun. 14, 4472 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Yang, C., Zhang, S. & Hou, J. Low-cost and efficient organic solar cells based on polythiophene and poly(thiophene vinylene)-related donors. Aggregate 3, e111 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Zou, W. et al. Patterned growth of polyaniline nanowire arrays on a flexible substrate for high-performance gas sensing. Small 7, 3287–3291 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang, D. et al. Achieving highly efficient, mechanically robust and thermally stable organic solar cells through optimizing the branching position and side chain length of small molecule acceptors. Energy Environ. Sci. 18, 2342–2352 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ye, Q. et al. Ductile oligomeric acceptor-modified flexible organic solar cells show excellent mechanical robustness and near 18% efficiency. Adv. Mater. 35, 2305562 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chen, L. et al. Exploiting the donor-acceptor-additive interaction’s morphological effect on the performance of organic solar cells. Aggregate 5, e455 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Li, C. et al. Highly efficient organic solar cells enabled by suppressing triplet exciton formation and non-radiative recombination. Nat. Commun. 15, 8872 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gong, R. et al. A strain relaxation modulation for printing high-performance flexible pseudo-planar heterojunction organic solar cells. Adv. Mater. 37, 2501033 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Liu, F. et al. Organic solar cells with 18% efficiency enabled by an alloy acceptor: a two-in-one strategy. Adv. Mater. 33, 2100830 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Yuan, J. et al. Single-junction organic solar cell with over 15% efficiency using fused-ring acceptor with electron-deficient core. Joule 3, 1140–1151 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zeng, G. et al. Realizing 17.5% efficiency flexible organic solar cells via atomic-level chemical welding of silver nanowire electrodes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144, 8658–8668 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Xu, Z. et al. Thermoplastic elastomer enhanced interface adhesion and bending durability for flexible organic solar cells. NPJ Flex. Electron. 6, 56 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wang, J. et al. Intrinsically stretchable organic photovoltaics by redistributing strain to PEDOT:PSS with enhanced stretchability and interfacial adhesion. Nat. Commun. 15, 4902 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tan, L. et al. Highly efficient flexible polymer solar cells with robust mechanical stability. Adv. Sci. 6, 1801180 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Chong, K. et al. Realizing 19.05% efficiency polymer solar cells by progressively improving charge extraction and suppressing charge recombination. Adv. Mater. 34, 2109516 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Chen, X. et al. Realizing ultrahigh mechanical flexibility and >15% efficiency of flexible organic solar cells via a “welding” flexible transparent electrode. Adv. Mater 32, 1908478 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Chen, Y. et al. “Reinforced concrete”-like flexible transparent electrode for organic solar cells with high efficiency and mechanical robustness. Sci. China Chem. 65, 1164–1172 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fanady, B., Song, W., Peng, R., Wu, T. & Ge, Z. Efficiency enhancement of organic solar cells enabled by interface engineering of sol-gel zinc oxide with an oxadiazole-based material. Org. Electron. 76, 105483 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Li, H. et al. Molecularly Interlocked interfaces enable record-efficiency stretchable organic photovoltaics. Adv. Mater. 37, 2507761 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Yang, K. et al. Molecular lock induced by chloroplatinic acid doping of PEDOT:PSS for high-performance organic photovoltaics. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12, 30954–30961 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lee, I., Noh, J., Lee, J. Y. & Kim, T. S. Cooptimization of adhesion and power conversion efficiency of organic solar cells by controlling surface energy of buffer layers. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9, 37395–37401 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Han, Y. et al. Efficiency above 12% for 1 cm2 flexible organic solar cells with Ag/Cu grid transparent conducting electrode. Adv. Sci. 6, 1901490 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Juillard, S. et al. Mechanical reliability of flexible encapsulated organic solar cells: characterization and improvement. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10, 29805–29813 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Li, S., Li, Z., Wan, X. & Chen, Y. Recent progress in flexible organic solar cells. eScience 3, 100085 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sun, Y. et al. Flexible organic photovoltaics based on water-processed silver nanowire electrodes. Nat. Electron. 2, 513–520 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Song, W. et al. Ultra robust and highly efficient flexible organic solar cells with over 18% efficiency realized by incorporating a linker dimerized acceptor. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62, e202310034 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  28. He, H. et al. Dynamic hydrogen-bonding enables high-performance and mechanically robust organic solar cells processed with non-halogenated solvent. Nat. Commun. 16, 787 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Gregori, A. et al. The role of donor polymer and PEDOT:PSS formulation on adhesion processes in inverted organic solar cells. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 174, 25–33 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Jiang, W. et al. Design of intrinsically stable hole-selective self-assembled monolayers by introducing fused-ring intramolecular donor–acceptor interactions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 64, e202507273 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Dupont, S. R., Voroshazi, E., Heremans, P. & Dauskardt, R. H. Adhesion properties of inverted polymer solarcells: processing and film structure parameters. Org. Electron. 14, 1262–1270 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Samir, M., Sacramento, A., Almora, O., Pallarès, J. & Marsal, L. F. A facile low prevacuum treatment to enhance the durability of nonfullerene organic solar cells. Sol. RRL 8, 2400479 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Zhao, W. et al. Vacuum-assisted annealing method for high efficiency printable large-area polymer solar cell modules. J. Mater. Chem. C 7, 3206–3211 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Liu, X. et al. Fluidic manipulating of printable zinc oxide for flexible organic solar cells. Adv. Mater. 34, 2106453 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Wang, Y. et al. A novel upside-down thermal annealing method toward high-quality active layers enables organic solar cells with efficiency approaching 20%. Adv. Mater. 36, 2411957 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Li, Y. Hybrid interfacial engineering enables organic solar cells to 21% efficiency. Sci. China Mater. 69, 1–2 (2025).

  37. Li, C. et al. Non-fullerene acceptors with branched side chains and improved molecular packing to exceed 18% efficiency in organic solar cells. Nat. Energy 6, 605–613 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Li, C. et al. Achieving record-efficiency organic solar cells upon tuning the conformation of solid additives. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144, 14731–14739 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Liu, C. et al. Oligomeric carbazole phosphonic acid as hole-transporting layer for organic solar cells with efficiency of 19.63%. Adv. Funct. Mater. 35, 2417786 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Li, C. et al. Organic solar cells with 21% efficiency enabled by a hybrid interfacial layer with dual-component synergy. Nat. Mater. 24, 1626–1634 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Wu, S. Calculation of interfacial tension in polymer systems. J. Polym. Sci. Part C Polym. Symp. 34, 19–30 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Li, H. et al. Synergistic multimodal energy dissipation enhances certified efficiency of flexible organic photovoltaics beyond 19%. Adv. Mater. 37, 2411989 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Ye, Q. et al. The butterfly-effect of flexible linkers in giant-molecule acceptors: optimized crystallization and aggregation for enhancing mechanical durability and approaching 19% efficiency in binary organic solar cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 18, 4373 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Song, X. et al. Process-aid solid engineering triggers delicately modulation of Y-series non-fullerene acceptor for efficient organic solar cells. Adv. Mater. 34, 2200907 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Qian, D. et al. Design rules for minimizing voltage losses in high-efficiency organic solar cells. Nat. Mater. 17, 703–709 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Yao, J. et al. Quantifying losses in open-circuit voltage in solution-processable solar cells. Phys. Rev. Appl. 4, 014020 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Zhan, Y. et al. Nacre inspired robust self-encapsulating flexible perovskite photodetector. Nano Energy 98, 107254 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Hang, Y. et al. Mechanical properties and interfacial adhesion of composite membranes probed by in-situ nano-indentation/scratch technique. Membr. Sci. 494, 205 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the financial support from the NSFC (52450063 to H.H., 52120105006 to H.H., 52522314 to Y.C., and 52473200 to Y.C.), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (E4ER1801 to H.H. and E3ET1803 to H.H.), and the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDB 0520103 to H.H.).

Author information

Author notes
  1. These authors contributed equally: Siying Wang, Ruxue Ding.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Materials Science and Opto-Electronic Technology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

    Siying Wang, Ruxue Ding, Ziyang Zhang, Yunhao Cai & Hui Huang

  2. Institute of Chemistry, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

    Yawei Liu, Yao Zhao & Zihao Xu

  3. School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, State Key Laboratory of Chemical Engineering and Low-Carbon Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China

    Jiarui Wang & Hui Huang

  4. College of Materials Science and Engineering, Donghua University, Shanghai, China

    Jiali Weng & Zheng Tang

  5. Key Laboratory of Nanosystem and Hierarchical Fabrication, National Center for Nanoscience and Technology, Beijing, China

    Jianqi Zhang

Authors
  1. Siying Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ruxue Ding
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ziyang Zhang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yawei Liu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jiarui Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jiali Weng
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Yao Zhao
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Jianqi Zhang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Zihao Xu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Zheng Tang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Yunhao Cai
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Hui Huang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

H.H., Y.C., and S.W. developed the concept and conceived the idea. H.H. and Y.C. supervised and directed this project. S.W., R.D., and J.W. participated in the optimization of device fabrication. S.W. and Z.Z. prepared samples for characterization analysis. S.W., R.D., and Z.Z. analyzed and processed data. S.W. and R.D. wrote the manuscript, and H.H. and Y.C. contributed to revisions of the manuscript. Z.X. and Y.L. conducted the TAS measurements and data analysis. Z.T. and J.W. conducted the energy loss measurements and data analysis. J.Z. carried out the GIWAXS measurements. Y.Z. contributed to the TOF-SIMS measurements. All the authors participated in the data analysis and commented on the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yunhao Cai or Hui Huang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks Hae Jung Son, and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (download PDF )

Reporting Summary (download PDF )

Transparent Peer Review file (download PDF )

Source data

Source data (download ZIP )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, S., Ding, R., Zhang, Z. et al. Vacuum-induced interfacial compaction for scalable fabrication of high-performance organic solar cells. Nat Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-70579-w

Download citation

  • Received: 13 October 2025

  • Accepted: 02 March 2026

  • Published: 14 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-70579-w

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Videos
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Editors
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors' Highlights
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Top Articles

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • For Reviewers
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Nature Communications (Nat Commun)

ISSN 2041-1723 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing