Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

ZmICE1a regulates the defence–storage trade-off in maize endosperm

Abstract

The endosperm of cereal grains feeds the entire world as a major food supply; however, little is known about its defence response during endosperm development. The Inducer of CBF Expression 1 (ICE1) is a well-known regulator of cold tolerance in plants. ICE1 has a monocot-specific homologue that is preferentially expressed in cereal endosperms but with an unclear regulatory function. Here we characterized the function of monocot-specific ZmICE1a, which is expressed in the entire endosperm, with a predominant expression in its peripheral regions, including the aleurone layer, subaleurone layer and basal endosperm transfer layer in maize (Zea mays). Loss of function of ZmICE1a reduced starch content and kernel weight. RNA sequencing and CUT&Tag-seq analyses revealed that ZmICE1a positively regulates genes in starch synthesis while negatively regulating genes in aleurone layer-specific defence and the synthesis of indole-3-acetic acid and jasmonic acid (JA). Exogenous indole-3-acetic acid and JA both induce the expression of numerous defence genes, which show distinct spatial-specific expression in the basal endosperm transfer layer and subaleurone layer, respectively. Moreover, we dissected a JA–ZmJAZ9–ZmICE1a–MPI signalling axis involved in JA-mediated defence regulation. Overall, our study revealed ZmICE1a as a key regulator of endosperm defence response and a coordinator of the defence–storage trade-off in endosperm development.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Loss of function of monocot-specific ZmICE1a reduces kernel weight.
Fig. 2: zmice1a down-regulates starch synthesis genes while up-regulating defence genes in the peripheral endosperm and phytohormone synthesis genes.
Fig. 3: ZmICE1a positively regulates starch synthesis while negatively regulating defence response and phytohormone synthesis.
Fig. 4: ZmICE1a indirectly regulates defence genes in BETL through IAA.
Fig. 5: ZmICE1a indirectly regulates defence genes in SAL through JA.
Fig. 6: The JA–ZmJAZ9–ZmICE1a–MPI signalling axis regulates defence response in AL and SAL.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

RNA-seq and CUT&Tag-seq data are available from the National Center for Biotechnology Information Gene Expression Omnibus (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo) under the series entries GSE254177 and GSE254066, respectively. In addition, the internal control gene UBIQUITIN for gene expression normalization is available under GenBank accession number BT018032. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. Chinnusamy, V. et al. ICE1: a regulator of cold-induced transcriptome and freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev. 17, 1043–1054 (2003).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Shi, Y., Ding, Y. & Yang, S. Molecular regulation of CBF signaling in cold acclimation. Trends Plant Sci. 23, 623–637 (2018).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tang, K. et al. The transcription factor ICE1 functions in cold stress response by binding to the promoters of CBF and COR genes. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 62, 258–263 (2020).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Grimault, A. et al. ZmZHOUPI, an endosperm-specific basic helix–loop–helix transcription factor involved in maize seed development. Plant J. 84, 574–586 (2015).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jiao, Y. et al. Improved maize reference genome with single-molecule technologies. Nature 546, 524–527 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Jiang, H. et al. Natural polymorphism of ZmICE1 contributes to amino acid metabolism that impacts cold tolerance in maize. Nat. Plants 8, 1176–1190 (2022).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Feng, F. et al. OPAQUE11 is a central hub of the regulatory network for maize endosperm development and nutrient metabolism. Plant Cell 30, 375–396 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Tanaka, H. et al. A subtilisin-like serine protease is required for epidermal surface formation in Arabidopsis embryos and juvenile plants. Development 128, 4681–4689 (2001).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Doll, N. M. & Ingram, G. C. Embryo–endosperm interactions. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 73, 293–321 (2022).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Denay, G. et al. Endosperm breakdown in Arabidopsis requires heterodimers of the basic helix–loop–helix proteins ZHOUPI and INDUCER OF CBP EXPRESSION 1. Development 141, 1222–1227 (2014).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dai, D., Ma, Z. & Song, R. Maize endosperm development. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 63, 613–627 (2021).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hannah, L. C. & Boehlein, S. Starch biosynthesis in maize endosperm. in Maize Kernel Development (ed. Larkins, B. A.) 149–159 (CABI, 2017).

  13. Huang, L., Tan, H., Zhang, C., Li, Q. & Liu, Q. Starch biosynthesis in cereal endosperms: an updated review over the last decade. Plant Commun. 2, 100237 (2021).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen, E. et al. The transcription factors ZmNAC128 and ZmNAC130 coordinate with Opaque2 to promote endosperm filling in maize. Plant Cell 35, 4066–4090 (2023).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu, H. et al. Pleiotropic ZmICE1 is an important transcriptional regulator of maize endosperm starch biosynthesis. Front. Plant Sci. 13, 895763 (2022).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Felker, F. C. & Shannon, J. C. Movement of C-labeled assimilates into kernels of Zea mays L: III. An anatomical examination and microautoradiographic study of assimilate transfer. Plant Physiol. 65, 864–870 (1980).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Bihmidine, S., Hunter, C. T., Johns, C. E., Koch, K. E. & Braun, D. M. Regulation of assimilate import into sink organs: update on molecular drivers of sink strength. Front. Plant Sci. 4, 177 (2013).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Chourey, P. S. & Hueros, G. The basal endosperm transfer layer (BETL): gateway to the maize kernel. in Maize Kernel Development (ed. Larkins, B. A.) 56–67 (CABI, 2017).

  19. Wang, Q. et al. ENB1 encodes a cellulose synthase 5 that directs synthesis of cell wall ingrowths in maize basal endosperm transfer cells. Plant Cell 34, 1054–1074 (2022).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gontarek, B. C. & Becraft, P. W. Aleurone. in Maize Kernel Development (ed. Larkins, B. A.) 68–80 (CABI, 2017).

  21. Hueros, G., Royo, J., Maitz, M., Salamini, F. & Thompson, R. D. Evidence for factors regulating transfer cell-specific expression in maize endosperm. Plant Mol. Biol. 41, 403–414 (1999).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Serna, A. et al. Maize endosperm secretes a novel antifungal protein into adjacent maternal tissue. Plant J. 25, 687–698 (2001).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Jerkovic, A. et al. Strategic distribution of protective proteins within bran layers of wheat protects the nutrient-rich endosperm. Plant Physiol. 152, 1459–1470 (2010).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Huang, H., Liu, B., Liu, L. & Song, S. Jasmonate action in plant growth and development. J. Exp. Bot. 68, 1349–1359 (2017).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Howe, G. A., Major, I. T. & Koo, A. J. Modularity in jasmonate signaling for multistress resilience. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 69, 387–415 (2018).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang, Y., Mostafa, S., Zeng, W. & Jin, B. Function and mechanism of jasmonic acid in plant responses to abiotic and biotic stresses. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22, 8568 (2021).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Creelman, R. A. & Mullet, J. E. Biosynthesis and action of jasmonates in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 48, 355–381 (1997).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wang, J., Wu, D., Wang, Y. & Xie, D. Jasmonate action in plant defense against insects. J. Exp. Bot. 70, 3391–3400 (2019).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wari, D., Aboshi, T., Shinya, T. & Galis, I. Integrated view of plant metabolic defense with particular focus on chewing herbivores. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 64, 449–475 (2022).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhu-Salzman, K. & Zeng, R. Insect response to plant defensive protease inhibitors. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 60, 233–252 (2015).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sultana, M. S., Millwood, R. J., Mazarei, M. & Stewart, C. N. Jr. Proteinase inhibitors in legume herbivore defense: from natural to genetically engineered protectants. Plant Cell Rep. 41, 293–305 (2022).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Krawetz, J. E. & Boston, R. S. Substrate specificity of a maize ribosome-inactivating protein differs across diverse taxa. Eur. J. Biochem. 267, 1966–1974 (2000).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhu, F., Zhou, Y. K., Ji, Z. L. & Chen, X. R. The plant ribosome-inactivating proteins play important roles in defense against pathogens and insect pest attacks. Front. Plant Sci. 9, 146 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Kazan, K. & Manners, J. M. Linking development to defense: auxin in plant–pathogen interactions. Trends Plant Sci. 14, 373–382 (2009).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Ludwig-Müller, J. Bacteria and fungi controlling plant growth by manipulating auxin: balance between development and defense. J. Plant Physiol. 172, 4–12 (2015).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Tian, T. et al. agriGO v2.0: a GO analysis toolkit for the agricultural community, 2017 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, W122–W129 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Tiffin, P. & Gaut, B. S. Molecular evolution of the wound-induced serine protease inhibitor wip1 in Zea and related genera. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18, 2092–2101 (2001).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Tedeschi, F. et al. Wheat Subtilisin/Chymotrypsin Inhibitor (WSCI) as a scaffold for novel serine protease inhibitors with a given specificity. Mol. Biosyst. 8, 3335–3343 (2012).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Chourey, P. S., Li, Q. B. & Kumar, D. Sugar-hormone cross-talk in seed development: two redundant pathways of IAA biosynthesis are regulated differentially in the invertase-deficient miniature1 (mn1) seed mutant in maize. Mol. Plant 3, 1026–1036 (2010).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Bernardi, J. et al. Impaired auxin biosynthesis in the defective endosperm18 mutant is due to mutational loss of expression in the ZmYuc1 gene encoding endosperm-specific YUCCA1 protein in maize. Plant Physiol. 160, 1318–1328 (2012).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Zhao, Y. Essential roles of local auxin biosynthesis in plant development and in adaptation to environmental changes. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 69, 417–435 (2018).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Yuan, H. M., Liu, W. C. & Lu, Y. T. CATALASE2 coordinates SA-mediated repression of both auxin accumulation and JA biosynthesis in plant defenses. Cell Host Microbe 21, 143–155 (2017).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Liu, X. et al. The intergenic region of the maize defensin-like protein genes Def1 and Def2 functions as an embryo-specific asymmetric bidirectional promoter. J. Exp. Bot. 67, 4403–4413 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Noonan, J., Williams, W. P. & Shan, X. Investigation of antimicrobial peptide genes associated with fungus and insect resistance in maize. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 18, 1938 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Shivaji, R. et al. Plants on constant alert: elevated levels of jasmonic acid and jasmonate-induced transcripts in caterpillar-resistant maize. J. Chem. Ecol. 36, 179–191 (2010).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Kanaoka, M. M. et al. SCREAM/ICE1 and SCREAM2 specify three cell-state transitional steps leading to Arabidopsis stomatal differentiation. Plant Cell 20, 1775–1785 (2008).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Pillitteri, L. J. & Torii, K. U. Mechanisms of stomatal development. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 63, 591–614 (2012).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Lampard, G. R., Macalister, C. A. & Bergmann, D. C. Arabidopsis stomatal initiation is controlled by MAPK-mediated regulation of the bHLH SPEECHLESS. Science 322, 1113–1116 (2008).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Doll, N. M. et al. A two-way molecular dialogue between embryo and endosperm is required for seed development. Science 367, 431–435 (2020).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Ganz, T. Defensins: antimicrobial peptides of innate immunity. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 3, 710–720 (2003).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Odintsova, T. I., Slezina, M. P. & Istomina, E. A. Defensins of grasses: a systematic review. Biomolecules 10, 1029 (2020).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Dowd, P. F., Zuo, W. N., Gillikin, J. W., Johnson, E. T. & Boston, R. S. Enhanced resistance to Helicoverpa zea in tobacco expressing an activated form of maize ribosome-inactivating protein. J. Agric. Food Chem. 51, 3568–3574 (2003).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Dowd, P. F., Johnson, E. T. & Price, N. P. Enhanced pest resistance of maize leaves expressing monocot crop plant-derived ribosome-inactivating protein and agglutinin. J. Agric. Food Chem. 60, 10768–10775 (2012).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Lanzanova, C. et al. The Zea mays b-32 ribosome-inactivating protein efficiently inhibits growth of Fusarium verticillioides on leaf pieces in vitro. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 124, 471–482 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Pang, J. et al. Kernel size-related genes revealed by an integrated eQTL analysis during early maize kernel development. Plant J. 98, 19–32 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Huot, B., Yao, J., Montgomery, B. L. & He, S. Y. Growth-defense tradeoffs in plants: a balancing act to optimize fitness. Mol. Plant 7, 1267–1287 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. He, Z., Webster, S. & He, S. Y. Growth–defense trade-offs in plants. Curr. Biol. 32, R634–R639 (2022).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. De Vleesschauwer, D., Gheysen, G. & Höfte, M. Hormone defense networking in rice: tales from a different world. Trends Plant Sci. 18, 555–565 (2013).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Ma, C. et al. ZmMYC2s play important roles in maize responses to simulated herbivory and jasmonate. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 65, 1041–1058 (2023).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Fernández-Calvo, P. et al. The Arabidopsis bHLH transcription factors MYC3 and MYC4 are targets of JAZ repressors and act additively with MYC2 in the activation of jasmonate responses. Plant Cell 23, 701–715 (2011).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Wang, G. et al. Opaque1 encodes a myosin XI motor protein that is required for endoplasmic reticulum motility and protein body formation in maize endosperm. Plant Cell 24, 3447–3462 (2012).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Marchler-Bauer, A. et al. CDD/SPARCLE: functional classification of proteins via subfamily domain architectures. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, D200–D203 (2017).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Chen, C. et al. TBtools: an integrative toolkit developed for interactive analyses of big biological data. Mol. Plant 13, 1194–1202 (2020).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Bernard, L., Ciceri, P. & Viotti, A. Molecular analysis of wild-type and mutant alleles at the Opaque-2 regulatory locus of maize reveals different mutations and types of O2 products. Plant Mol. Biol. 24, 949–959 (1994).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. He, Y., Wang, J., Qi, W. & Song, R. Maize Dek15 encodes the cohesin-loading complex subunit SCC4 and is essential for chromosome segregation and kernel development. Plant Cell 31, 465–485 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Qi, W. et al. Maize reas1 mutant stimulates ribosome use efficiency and triggers distinct transcriptional and translational responses. Plant Physiol. 170, 971–988 (2016).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Chen, J. et al. MP3RNA-seq: massively parallel 3’ end RNA sequencing for high-throughput gene expression profiling and genotyping. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 63, 1227–1239 (2021).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Tao, X., Feng, S., Zhao, T. & Guan, X. Efficient chromatin profiling of H3K4me3 modification in cotton using CUT&Tag. Plant Methods 16, 120 (2020).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Yu, G., Wang, L. G. & He, Q. Y. ChIPseeker: an R/Bioconductor package for ChIP peak annotation, comparison and visualization. Bioinformatics 31, 2382–2383 (2015).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Yoo, S. D., Cho, Y. H. & Sheen, J. Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplasts: a versatile cell system for transient gene expression analysis. Nat. Protoc. 2, 1565–1572 (2007).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Shu, X. et al. Tissue-specific gene expression in maize seeds during colonization by Aspergillus flavus and Fusarium verticillioides. Mol. Plant Pathol. 16, 662–674 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Ma, P. et al. Genetic variation in ZmWAX2 confers maize resistance to Fusarium verticillioides. Plant Biotechnol. J. 21, 1812–1826 (2023).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Dave, A. et al. 12-Oxo-phytodienoic acid accumulation during seed development represses seed germination in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 23, 583–599 (2011).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Wang, B. et al. Tryptophan-independent auxin biosynthesis contributes to early embryogenesis in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 4821–4826 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Fu, Y. et al. Spatial transcriptomics uncover sucrose post-phloem transport during maize kernel development. Nat. Commun. 14, 7191 (2023).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Yu, Y., Zhang, H., Long, Y., Shu, Y. & Zhai, J. Plant Public RNA-seq Database: a comprehensive online database for expression analysis of ~45 000 plant public RNA-Seq libraries. Plant Biotechnol. J. 20, 806–808 (2022).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank L. Jin and T. Zhu (Shanghai University) for their technical support. We thank Q. Xu and Y. Lu (Shandong Agricultural University) for the measurement of endogenous JA. We thank J. Chu and J. Yan (Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences) for the measurement of endogenous IAA. This study was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32301846 to Q.W.), the Science and Technology Innovation 2030-Major Project (2023ZD0403005 to R.S.) and the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2023YFF1000400 to Z.M.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

R.S. conceived the project. R.S., Q.W. and F.F. designed the experiments. Q.W., F.F., K.Z. and Y.H. performed the experiments. All authors analysed the data. Q.W., Z.M. and R.S. wrote the paper.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zeyang Ma or Rentao Song.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Plants thanks Daoxin Xie and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Transcription factor features and expression analysis of ZmICE1a.

a, Subcellular localization of ZmICE1a. Fluorescent signals from the expression of ZmICE1a-GFP and GFP alone (negative control) in the protoplasts of maize leaves. Scale bars, 100 μm. Experiments were repeated three times yielding similar results. b, Yeast transactivation assay of ZmICE1a. The β-galactosidase activity resulting from TF transactivation was measured in the yeast. The pGBK-T7 vector alone (BD) was used as a negative control. BD-O2 was used as a positive control. Data are mean ± s.e.m. (n = 3 biologically independent samples). ****, P < 0.0001; two-tailed Student’s t-test; for exact P values, see Source Data. c, d, RNA expression pattern of ZmICE1a in various tissues and developing kernels (c), and the three-components of kernels (d). Data are mean ± s.e.m. (n = 3 biologically independent samples). Per, pericarp; En, endosperm; Em, embryo.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 2 Biochemical analysis in mutants with loss-of-function of ZmICE1a.

a, Kernel weight of mature WT and zmice1a-2# kernels from a segregated F2 ear. n = 55 kernels in WT, n = 15 kernels in zmice1a-2#. The middle line of the box represents the median, while the lower and upper bounds represent the 25th and 75th percentiles, respectively. The whiskers extend from the minimum to the maximum values. *, P < 0.05; two-sided Wilcoxon Rank Sum test (P = 0.0347). b, Protein content of mature WT and zmice1a kernels. Data are mean ± s.e.m. (n = 3 biologically independent samples). ns, not significant; two-tailed Student’s t-test (P = 0.199). c, The ratio of zein to non-zein in mature WT and zmice1a kernels. Data are mean ± s.e.m. (n = 4 biologically independent samples). ns, not significant; two-tailed Student’s t-test (P = 0.817).

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 3 Phenotypic analysis of zmice1a/1b kernels.

a, Expression analysis of ZmICE1 genes in developing endosperms. Data are mean ± s.e.m. (n = 3 biologically independent samples). For ZmICE1c, one Ct value was not detected in the 12 DAP and 21 DAP endosperm samples. b, Diagram of the CRISPR/Cas9 editing target sites in exon 1 of ZmICE1b. Red arrowheads indicate two editing target sites. The 20-bp targets are highlighted in red. PAM represents the protospacer adjacent motif. Deleted nucleotides are depicted as dashes, and inserted nucleotides are highlighted in blue. c, Mature kernels of WT, zmice1a, zmice1b, and zmice1a /1b from a segregated F2 ear. Scale bars, 1 cm. d, Kernel weight of WT, zmice1a, zmice1b, and zmice1a/1b mature kernels from two segregated F2 ears. The middle line of the box represents the median, while the lower and upper bounds represent the 25th and 75th percentiles, respectively. The whiskers extend from the minimum to the maximum values. Different letters denote significant differences (P < 0.05, one-way ANOVA, Tukey’s HSD test); for exact P values, see Source Data.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 4 RNA-seq analysis of zmice1a endosperms.

a, RT-qPCR analysis of several representative DEGs in the WT and zmice1a endosperms. Data are mean ± s.e.m. (n = 3 biologically independent samples). **, P < 0.01; *, P < 0.05; two-tailed Student’s t-test; for exact P values, see Source Data. b, Heatmap depicting the log2 (fold change) of representative BETL and AL marker genes involved in defence response in the zmice1a endosperms. c, Expression levels of BETL and AL marker genes (SWEET4c and VPP7) in the WT and zmice1a endosperms. Data are mean ± s.e.m. (n = 3 biologically independent samples). ns, not significant; two-tailed Student’s t-test; for exact P values, see Source Data. d, BETL and AL marker genes used in (b) and (c) were functionally annotated. The genes with changed expression levels in the zmice1a endosperms were highlighted in red. e, f, Pathways of IAA synthesis (e) and JA synthesis (f). The expression of enzyme-encoding genes affected by the zmice1a mutation is highlighted in the red boxes.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 5 CUT&Tag-seq analysis of ZmICE1a.

a, Peak number in two replicates of CUT&Tag-seq data. b, Distribution of ZmICE1a binding region peaks (peak count frequency) corresponding to ± 3000-bp regions flanking the TSS. c, ZmICE1a binding motif identified by MEME-ChIP in the 1000 bp flanking sequences around the genic peak summits. d to f, Peak distribution of ZmICE1a-binding sites for CBF genes (d), COR genes (e), and SBT5.3 (f), visualized using IGV. Rep1 and rep2 indicate two replicates of CUT&Tag-seq data. g, Expression levels of SBT5.3 in maize kernel. Data were collected from the Fu et al. gene expression dataset75. AL, aleurone; BETL, basal endosperm transfer layer; CZ, conducting zone; EAS, endosperm adjacent to scutellum; ESR, embryo-surrounding region; PC, placento-chalazal; PE, pericarp; EM, embryo; SCU, scutellum; SE, starchy endosperm; VE, vitreous endosperm.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 6 ZmICE1a regulates starch synthesis of maize endosperms.

a, Schematic diagram shows constructs used in the dual-LUC transient transcriptional activity assays. b, Transcriptional activities of ZmICE1a on the promoters of two key regulator of starch synthesis. Data are mean ± s.e.m. (n = 3 biologically independent samples). **, P < 0.01; two-tailed Student’s t-test; for exact P values, see Source Data. c, d, Resin section (c) and TEM (d) observations of starch granules (SGs) in 15 DAP WT and zmice1a endosperms. AL, aleurone layer. Scale bars, 100 μm (c) and 10 μm (d). Experiments were repeated three times yielding similar results.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 7 Def1 and Def2 effectively inhibit the germination and growth of F. verticillioides.

a, Western blot analysis of purified negative control protein (empty vector), Def1, and Def2. Experiments were repeated three times yielding similar results. b, Microscopic observations of F. verticillioides treated with Def1 and Def2. Fv, F. verticillioides. Scale bars, 200 μm. Experiments were repeated three times yielding similar results.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 8 Exogenous phytohormone treatment represses the expression of starch synthesis genes in maize endosperms.

a, Heatmap depicting the log2 (fold change) of starch synthesis genes in the IAA-treated endosperms. b, Expression of GBSSI in the JA-treated endosperms. Data from RNA-seq of JA-treated endosperms are presented as mean ± s.e.m. (n = 3 biologically independent samples). **, P < 0.01; two-tailed Student’s t-test (P = 0.0021).

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 9 LCI assay confirms the interactions between ZmICE1a and candidate proteins identified by CoIP-MS.

Interaction assays of ZmICE1a and candidate proteins such as ZmICE1b (a), ZmbHLH99 (b), ZmWRI1 (c), and ZmCKB4 (d). The lower-right section shows the interaction signal between ZmICE1a and candidate proteins, while the other three sections show the signals of the negative controls. The fluorescent signal intensity represents their interaction activities.

Extended Data Fig. 10 RNA expression patterns of rice homologs of ZmICE1a and its key targets in the various rice tissues.

Expression of rice homologues of ZmICE1a (a), ZmDef2 (b), ZmSSI (c), ZmSSIIa (d), ZmACX3 (e), and ZmTAR1 (f). Data are from the Yu et al. gene expression dataset76, and the corresponding bar graphs were obtained from the website (http://ipf.sustech.edu.cn/pub/ricerna/). F. reprod. tissue, female reproductive tissue; M. reprod. tissue, male reproductive tissue.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1–3.

Reporting Summary

41477_2024_1845_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx

Supplementary Table 1 DEGs of WT and zmice1a endosperms at 15 DAP. Supplementary Table 2 ZmICE1a binding genes identified by CUT&Tag-seq generated from two biological replicates. Supplementary Table 3 High-confidence targets of ZmICE1a. Supplementary Table 4 DEGs of IAA-untreated and IAA-treated WT endosperms. Supplementary Table 5 DEGs of JA-untreated and JA-treated WT endosperms. Supplementary Table 6 Potential interacting proteins of ZmICE1a. Supplementary Table 7 ZmICE1a-regulated JA-responsive genes. Supplementary Table 8 Primers used in this study.

Source data

Source Data Figs. 1, 3 and 6 and Source Data Extended Data Figs. 1–6 and 8

Statistical source data.

Source Data Fig. 1

Unprocessed western blots.

Source Data Fig. 6

Unprocessed western blots.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 7

Unprocessed western blots.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Q., Feng, F., Zhang, K. et al. ZmICE1a regulates the defence–storage trade-off in maize endosperm. Nat. Plants 10, 1999–2013 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-024-01845-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-024-01845-2

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing