Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Structural insights into type-I and type-II Lamassu antiphage systems

Subjects

Abstract

Bacteria have developed a variety of immune systems to combat phage infections. The Lamassu system is a prokaryotic immune system with a core conserved structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) superfamily protein LmuB and diverse effectors named LmuA, whose mechanism remains unclear. Here we present a series of cryo-electron microscopy structures of the type-I Lamassu complex from Bacillus cellulasensis and the type-II Lamassu complex from Vibrio cholerae, both in apo and dsDNA-bound states, revealing an unexpected stoichiometry and topological architecture distinct from canonical SMC complexes. Combined structural and biochemical analyses show how the nuclease effector LmuA is sequestered in an inactive monomeric form within the Lamassu complex and, upon sensing foreign DNA ends, dissociates and assembles into an active tetramer capable of DNA cleavage. Our findings elucidate the mechanism by which Lamassu systems detect viral replication and implement antiphage defense, highlighting the roles of SMC proteins in prokaryotic immunity.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Type-I and type-II Lamassu complexes are activated by DNA ends and regulated by ATP.
Fig. 2: Apo-state structure of type-I and type-II Lamassu complexes.
Fig. 3: Interface interactions are essential for activity of type-I and type-II Lamassu system.
Fig. 4: DNA-bound state structure of type-I and type-II Lamassu complexes.
Fig. 5: Structural basis of the activated form of LmuA.
Fig. 6: Working model of Lamassu antiphage system.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Cryo-EM structures and atomic models generated in this study have been deposited in the wwPDB OneDep System under EMD accession codes EMD-64575, EMD-64576, EMD-64585, EMD-64586, EMD-64583 and EMD-64584 and PDB ID codes under accession codes 9UX7, 9UX8, 9UXK, 9UXL, 9UXH and 9UXI. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. Georjon, H. & Bernheim, A. The highly diverse antiphage defence systems of bacteria. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 21, 686–700 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Deltcheva, E. et al. CRISPR RNA maturation by trans-encoded small RNA and host factor RNase III. Nature 471, 602–607 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Barrangou, R. & Horvath, P. A decade of discovery: CRISPR functions and applications. Nat. Microbiol. 2, 17092 (2017).

  4. Tock, M. R. & Dryden, D. T. F. The biology of restriction and anti-restriction. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 8, 466–472 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kuzmenko, A. et al. DNA targeting and interference by a bacterial Argonaute nuclease. Nature 587, 632–637 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rousset, F. & Sorek, R. The evolutionary success of regulated cell death in bacterial immunity. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 74, 102312 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lopatina, A., Tal, N. & Sorek, R. Abortive infection: bacterial suicide as an antiviral immune strategy. Annu Rev. Virol. 7, 371–384 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cohen, D. et al. Cyclic GMP–AMP signalling protects bacteria against viral infection. Nature 574, 691–695 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ofir, G. et al. Antiviral activity of bacterial TIR domains via immune signalling molecules. Nature 600, 116–120 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu, X. et al. Target RNA activates the protease activity of Craspase to confer antiviral defense. Mol. Cell 82, 4503–4518 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang, X., Yao, J., Sun, Y.-C. & Wood, T. K. Type VII toxin/antitoxin classification system for antitoxins that enzymatically neutralize toxins. Trends Microbiol. 29, 388–393 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Stokar-Avihail, A. et al. Discovery of phage determinants that confer sensitivity to bacterial immune systems. Cell 186, 1863–1876 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Whiteley, A. T. et al. Bacterial cGAS-like enzymes synthesize diverse nucleotide signals. Nature 567, 194–199 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Duncan-Lowey, B. & Kranzusch, P. J. CBASS phage defense and evolution of antiviral nucleotide signaling. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 74, 156–163 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Doron, S. et al. Systematic discovery of antiphage defense systems in the microbial pangenome. Science 359, 6379 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Payne, L. J. et al. Identification and classification of antiviral defence systems in bacteria and archaea with PADLOC reveals new system types. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, 10868–10878 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Krishnan, A., Burroughs, A. M., Iyer, L. M. & Aravind, L. Comprehensive classification of ABC ATPases and their functional radiation in nucleoprotein dynamics and biological conflict systems. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, 10045–10075 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Millman, A. et al. An expanded arsenal of immune systems that protect bacteria from phages. Cell Host Microbe 30, 1556–1569 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Aframian, N. & Eldar, A. Abortive infection antiphage defense systems: separating mechanism and phenotype. Trends Microbiol. 31, 1003–1012 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Jaskolska, M., Adams, D. W. & Blokesch, M. Two defence systems eliminate plasmids from seventh pandemic Vibrio cholerae. Nature 604, 323–329 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Robins, W. P., Meader, B. T., Toska, J. & Mekalanos, J. J. DdmABC-dependent death triggered by viral palindromic DNA sequences. Cell Rep. 43, 114450 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Burmann, F. & Lowe, J. Structural biology of SMC complexes across the tree of life. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 80, 102598 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Yatskevich, S., Rhodes, J. & Nasmyth, K. Organization of chromosomal DNA by SMC complexes. Annu. Rev. Genet. 53, 445–482 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lowey, B. et al. CBASS immunity uses CARF-related effectors to sense 3′–5′- and 2′–5′-linked cyclic oligonucleotide signals and protect bacteria from phage infection. Cell 182, 38–49 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Li, Y. et al. Structure and activation mechanism of a Lamassu phage and plasmid defense system. Nat Struct Mol Biol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41594-025-01677-4 (2025).

  26. Kashammer, L. et al. Mechanism of DNA end sensing and processing by the Mre11–Rad50 complex. Mol. Cell 76, 382–394 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Abramson, J. et al. Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3. Nature 630, 493–500 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Sophie, N. & David, S. The bacterial chromosome: architecture and action of bacterial SMC and SMC-like complexes. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 38, 380–392 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Haudiquet, M. et al. Structural basis for Lamassu-based antiviral immunity and its evolution from DNA repair machinery. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 122, e2519643122 (2025).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Buckstein, M. H., He, J. & Rubin, H. Characterization of nucleotide pools as a function of physiological state in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 190, 718–726 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Rousset, F. et al. A conserved family of immune effectors cleaves cellular ATP upon viral infection. Cell 186, 3619–3631 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Tang, D., Chen, Y. & Yu, C. Y. Multiple enzymatic activities of a Sir2-HerA system cooperate for anti-phage defense. Mol. Cell 83, 4600–4613 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Li, J. et al. Structures and activation mechanism of the Gabija anti-phage system. Nature 629, 467–473 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Punjani, A., Rubinstein, J. L., Fleet, D. J. & Brubaker, M. A. cryoSPARC: algorithms for rapid unsupervised cryo-EM structure determination. Nat. Methods 14, 290–296 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Tang, G. et al. EMAN2: an extensible image processing suite for electron microscopy. J. Struct. Biol. 157, 38–46 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF ChimeraX: structure visualization for researchers, educators, and developers. Protein Sci. 30, 70–82 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Trabuco, L. G., Villa, E., Mitra, K., Frank, J. & Schulten, K. Flexible fitting of atomic structures into electron microscopy maps using molecular dynamics. Structure 16, 673–683 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 486–501 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Chen, V. B. et al. MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 12–21 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF Chimera—a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1605–1612 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Cryo-EM Center at the University of Science and Technology of China (USTC) for their assistance with the cryo-EM experiments. This work is supported by National Key Research and Development Program of China (grant nos. 2024YFA0916903 to Y.Z., 2022YFC3401500 to Y.F., 2022YFA1302700 to K.Z., 2022YFC2303700 to K.Z. and 2022YFC2104800 to Y.F.), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 32371329 to Y.Z., 32171274 to Y.F., 32371345 to K.Z., 32301044 and 32471301 to S.L.), Scientific Research Innovation Capability Support Project for Young Faculty (grant no. ZYGXQNJSKYCXNLZCXM-B1) to Y.F., the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (grant no. QNTD2023-01) to Y.F., Anhui Provincial Natural Science Foundation (grant no. 2308085QC80) to S.L., the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (grant no. XDB0490000) to K.Z., the Center for Advanced Interdisciplinary Science and Biomedicine of IHM (grant no. QYPY20220019) to K.Z. and the USTC Research Funds of the Double First-Class Initiative (grant nos. YD9100002048 to K.Z. and YD9100002044 to S.L.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Y.Z., K.Z. and Y.F. conceived and supervised the project and designed experiments. M.L., Xingyu Z., D.L., W.X., Z.G., L.H. and L.A. purified the proteins and performed in vitro activity analysis and in vivo assays. M.L., Xiaolong Z., Y.G. and K.Z. collected the cryo-EM data and solved the cryo-EM structures. S.L. built and refined the models. Y.Z. wrote the original manuscript. Y.F., K.Z. and Y.Z. revised the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yue Feng, Kaiming Zhang or Yi Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Chemical Biology thanks the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Type I and type II Lamassu systems both form heterooligomers.

ac, Purification profile of BcLmuA (a), BcLmuB (b) and BcLmuAB complex (c) on Superdex 200 column. d, SEC-MALS (Size Exclusion Chromatography with Multi-Angle Light Scattering) analysis of BcLmuB, BcLmuAB and VcLmuACB complex. Respective calculated molecular weight is marked on top of the peak. e, Statistics of the SEC-MALS results and theoretical molecular weight based on predicted complex ratios. f, g, Purification profile of VcLmuA (f) and VcLmuC (g) on Superdex-200 column. h, Purification test of His-SUMO-TEV-VcLmuB and SDS-PAGE gel of the samples. 1-bacteria pre-induced. 2-bacteria post-induced. 3-supernatant. 4-pellet. 5-flowthrough after Ni-column. 6-beads after wash. 7-Elution. 8-beads after elution. i, Purification profile of VcLmuACB complex on Superdex 200 column.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 2 DNA binding, ATPase and nuclease activity of the Lamassu system.

a, EMSA to test the binding of BcLmuAK59AB and VcLmuAK57GCB to dsDNA. BcLmuAK59AB and VcLmuAK57GCB is included at a concentration of 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8 μM, respectively. b, pUC19 digestion by VcLmuACB in the presence or absence of ATP or ATPγS, respectively. c, Measurement of ATP or ATPγS hydrolysis activity for VcLmuACB and BcLmuAB at 0.5 μM final with or without 0.5 μM 59 bp DNA duplex, 0.25 mM ATP or ATPγS. Each group with three replicate measurements. Means and standard deviations are shown.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 3 Single-particle cryo-EM analysis of the BcLmuAB complex.

a, Representative cryo-EM micrograph (upper) and reference-free 2D class averages (lower) of BcLmuAB. b, Workflow of the cryo-EM data processing. The final map resolution is color coded for different regions. c, Gold standard FSC plots for the 3D reconstructions of the whole map, calculated in cryoSPARC. d, Euler angle distribution of the particle images.

Extended Data Fig. 4 Single-particle cryo-EM data processing of VcLmuACB.

a, Representative cryo-EM micrograph of VcLmuACB. b, Representative cryoEM 2D averages of VcLmuACB. c, Cryo-EM data processing workflow for VcLmuACB. d, Gold standard FSC plot for the final 3D reconstruction of the whole map, calculated in cryoSPARC. e, Euler angle distribution of the particle images. f, The final map resolution is colored for different regions.

Extended Data Fig. 5 Single-particle cryo-EM data processing of VcLmuACB-pUC19.

a, Representative cryo-EM micrograph of VcLmuACB-pUC19. b, Reference-free 2D class averages of VcLmuACB-pUC19 c, Cryo-EM data processing workflow for VcLmuACB-pUC19. d, Gold standard FSC plot for the final 3D reconstruction. e, Euler angle distribution of the particle images. f, Resolution distribution (ResMap).

Extended Data Fig. 6 Structural alignment between different states of BcLmuAB and VcLmuACB complexes.

a, Structural alignment between the two apo state structures of VcLmuACB with different protein lengths. bd, Structural alignment between the apo and DNA-bound states of BcLmuAB (b), between the apo (partial structure) and DNA-bound states of VcLmuACB (c), and between the apo (full length) and DNA-bound states of VcLmuACB (d).

Extended Data Fig. 7 Inter-subunit interactions in the apo state of VcLmuACB (full length).

ae, Atomic model of the VcLmuACB complex is shown in a, in which detailed interactions between dsDNA and BcLmuAB are shown in be.

Extended Data Fig. 8 Single-particle cryo-EM analysis of the BcLmuAB-DNA complex.

a, Representative cryo-EM micrograph (left) and reference-free 2D class averages (right) of BcLmuAB-DNA. b, Workflow of the cryo-EM data processing. The final map resolution is color coded for different regions. c, Gold standard FSC plots for the 3D reconstructions of the whole map, calculated in cryoSPARC (left) and Euler angle distribution of the particle image(right).

Extended Data Fig. 9 Single-particle cryo-EM data processing of VcLmuACB-59bp DNA complex and VcLmuA-tetramer complex.

a, Representative cryo-EM micrograph of VcLmuACB-59bp DNA. b, Workflow of cryo-EM data processing of VcLmuACB-59bp DNA. c, Reference-free 2D class average of VcLmuACB-DNA. d, Reference-free 2D class average of VcLmuA-tetramer. e, Gold standard FSC plots for the 3D reconstructions of the whole map of VcLmuACB-DNA, calculated in cryoSPARC. f, Gold standard FSC plots for the 3D reconstructions of the whole map of VcLmuA-tetramer, calculated in cryoSPARC. g, Euler angle distribution of the particle image of VcLmuACB-DNA. h, Euler angle distribution of the particle image of VcLmuA-tetramer. i, The final map resolution is color coded for different regions of VcLmuACB-DNA. j, The final map resolution is color coded for different regions of VcLmuA-tetramer.

Extended Data Fig. 10 Enzymatic cleavage activity towards five types of DNA substrates.

a, Schematic representation and sequences of the five DNA structures. bf, Time-course cleavage of double-stranded (b), single-stranded (c), palindromic DNA (d), circular DNA (pUC19) (e) and Linear phage DNA (extracted from phage T1) (f) by two Lamassu systems. The reaction contains 80 nM VcLmuACB or 20 nM BcLmuAB and 1 μM DNA substrates (bd), 22 nM pUC19 or 1.2 nM T1 phage genomic DNA.

Source data

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (download PDF )

Supplementary Tables 1-2 and Figs. 1–3.

Reporting Summary (download PDF )

Supplementary Data 1 (download XLSX )

DNA and primer sequences used in this study.

Source data

Source Data Fig. 1 (download PDF )

Unprocessed gels and photos.

Source Data Fig. 3 (download PDF )

Unprocessed gels and photos.

Source Data Fig. 4 (download PDF )

Unprocessed gels and photos.

Source Data Fig. 5 (download PDF )

Unprocessed gels and photos.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 1 (download PDF )

Unprocessed gels and photos.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 2 (download PDF )

Unprocessed gels and photos.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 10 (download PDF )

Unprocessed gels and photos.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, M., Zhao, X., Zhao, X. et al. Structural insights into type-I and type-II Lamassu antiphage systems. Nat Chem Biol (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41589-025-02102-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41589-025-02102-z

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing Microbiology

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Microbiology newsletter — what matters in microbiology research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Microbiology