Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
A pseudouridine-related prognostic model of colorectal cancer based on single-cell sequencing analysis and transcriptome analysis
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 04 January 2026

A pseudouridine-related prognostic model of colorectal cancer based on single-cell sequencing analysis and transcriptome analysis

  • Zijing Wang1 na1,
  • Liyuan Ma2 na1,
  • Jinzhong Cao1 na1,
  • Shengtao Lin3,4,
  • Ruxue Ma1,
  • Jiang Wang5,
  • Hengyi Lv1,
  • Zixin Zhang1 &
  • …
  • Tao Jiang5 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 1188 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Biomarkers
  • Cancer
  • Computational biology and bioinformatics
  • Oncology

Abstract

Urinary pseudouridine levels have been proposed as diagnostic biomarkers for various malignancies; however, their association with colorectal cancer (CRC) remains unclear. This study investigates the molecular mechanisms underlying pseudouridine-related genes (PRGs) in CRC. The study incorporated a training cohort (TCGA-CRC), a validation cohort (GSE87211), a single-cell dataset (GSE200997), and PRGs retrieved from public databases. Quality control was performed on the single-cell dataset, followed by cell type annotation. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) across distinct cell populations were identified. Weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) was employed to screen module genes strongly correlated with PRG scores. DEGs between tumor and normal samples in the training cohort were also determined. Candidate genes were selected by intersecting DEGs from key cell types, tumor-normal comparisons, and WGCNA-derived module genes. A prognostic risk model was constructed using Cox regression analyses. Independent prognostic factors were identified through univariate and multivariate Cox analyses, integrating clinical parameters and risk scores, to establish a prognostic nomogram. Comparative analyses of mutation profiles, immune infiltration, and functional pathways were conducted between high- and low-risk groups, and molecular mechanisms of prognostic genes were explored. Additionally, pseudo-temporal trajectory analysis was applied to assess prognostic gene expression dynamics in key cell types. Seven cell types were annotated in the single-cell dataset, with T cells and epithelial cells representing predominant and functionally significant populations. A total of 116 candidate genes were identified by overlapping 4,762 DEGs from T cells, 4,525 DEGs from epithelial cells, 9,772 tumor-normal DEGs, and 2,990 module genes. A prognostic risk model incorporating three PRGs—BCL10, TAF1B, and WWTR1—was developed and validated across training and validation cohorts. Risk score, age, T stage, N stage, and tumor stage were recognized as independent prognostic factors for constructing the nomogram. Pseudo-temporal trajectory analysis revealed that TAF1B expression was relatively elevated at the terminal differentiation phase in epithelial cells. A pseudouridine-related prognostic model based on three PRGs was established and validated, offering a potential reference for CRC treatment and risk stratification.

Data availability

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov, The Cancer Genome Atlas; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo, The Gene Expression Omnibus; https://www.gsea-msigdb.org/gsea/msigdb/index.jsp, The Molecular Signatures Database.

References

  1. Arnold, M. et al. Global patterns and trends in colorectal cancer incidence and Mortalit y. Gut 66 (4), 683–691 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Puccini, A. et al. Colorectal cancer: epigenetic alterations and their clinical implicati Ons. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Rev. Cancer. 1868 (2), 439–448 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cavalli, G. & Heard, E. Advances in epigenetics link genetics to the environment and disease. Nature 571 (7766), 489–499 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chi, P., Allis, C. D. & Wang, G. G. Covalent histone modifications–miswritten, misinterpreted and mis-era Sed in human cancers. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 10 (7), 457–469 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Zhao, Z. & Shilatifard, A. Epigenetic modifications of histones in cancer. Genome Biol. 20 (1), 245 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brenner, H., Kloor, M. & Pox, C. P. Colorectal cancer. Lancet 383 (9927), 1490–1502 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Vera, R. et al. Multidisciplinary management of liver metastases in patients with Colo rectal cancer: a consensus of SEOM, AEC,SEOR, SERVEI, and SEMNIM. Clin. Transl Oncol. 22 (5), 647–662 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hon, K. W., Ab-Mutalib, N. S., Abdullah, N. M. A., Jamal, R. & Abu, N. Extracellular Vesicle-derived circular RNAs confers chemoresistance in colorectal cancer. Sci. Rep. 9 (1), 16497 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Siegel, R. L., Miller, K. D. & Jemal, A. Cancer statistics, 2015. CA Cancer J. Clin. 65 (1), 5–29 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Boccaletto, P. et al. MODOMICS: a database of RNA modification pathways. 2017 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 46 (D1), D303–D307 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Li, F. & Li, W. Readers of RNA modification in cancer and their anticancer inhibitors. Biomolecules 14 (7), 881 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Orsolic, I., Carrier, A. & Esteller, M. Genetic and epigenetic defects of the RNA modification machinery in Ca Ncer. Trends Genet. 39 (1), 74–88 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lin, S. & Kuang, M. RNA modification-mediated mRNA translation regulation in liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical perspectives. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 21 (4), 267–281 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang, X., Zhu, W-Y., Shen, S-Y., Shen, J-H. & Chen, X-D. Biological roles of RNA m7G modification and its implications in Cance r. Biol. Direct. 18 (1), 58 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Li, D., Fu, Z., Dong, C. & Song, Y. Methyltransferase 3, N6-adenosine-methyltransferase complex catalytic subunit-induced long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 1833 N6-methyla denosine methylation promotes the non-small cell lung cancer progressi on via regulating heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A2/B1 expres Sion. Bioengineered 13 (4), 10493–10503 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zimna, M., Dolata, J., Szweykowska-Kulinska, Z. & Jarmolowski, A. The expanding role of RNA modifications in plant RNA polymerase II Tra nscripts: highlights and perspectives. J. Exp. Bot. 74 (14), 3975–3986 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zou, J. et al. Dynamic regulation and key roles of ribonucleic acid methylation. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 16, 1058083 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bernick, D. L., Dennis, P. P., Höchsmann, M. & Lowe, T. M. Discovery of pyrobaculum small RNA families with atypical Pseudouridin e guide RNA features. RNA 18 (3), 402–411 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Krstulja, A. et al. Tailor-Made molecularly imprinted polymer for selective recognition of the urinary tumor marker Pseudouridine. Macromol. Biosci. 17 (12). https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.201700250 (2017).

  20. Barbieri, I. & Kouzarides, T. Role of RNA modifications in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 20 (6), 303–322 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Boriack-Sjodin, P. A., Ribich, S. & Copeland, R. A. RNA-modifying proteins as anticancer drug targets. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 17 (6), 435–453 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kan, G. et al. Dual Inhibition of DKC1 and MEK1/2 synergistically restrains the growt h of colorectal cancer cells. Adv. Sci. (Weinh). 8 (10), 2004344 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Alawi, F. & Lin, P. Dyskerin is required for tumor cell growth through mechanisms that are independent of its role in telomerase and only partially related to i Ts function in precursor rRNA processing. Mol. Carcinog. 50 (5), 334–345 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wu, X. et al. Yin X-Y: SUMO specific peptidase 3 halts pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma Metas Tasis via desumoylating DKC1. Cell. Death Differ. 30 (7), 1742–1756 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Liu, X-Y., Tan, Q. & Li, L-X. A pan-cancer analysis of dyskeratosis congenita 1 (DKC1) as a prognost Ic biomarker. Hereditas 160 (1), 38 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Haque, A., Engel, J., Teichmann, S. A. & Lönnberg, T. A practical guide to single-cell RNA-sequencing for biomedical researc h and clinical applications. Genome Med. 9 (1), 75 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Navin, N. E. The first five years of single-cell cancer genomics and beyond. Genome Res. 25 (10), 1499–1507 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Tang, F. et al. mRNA-Seq whole-transcriptome analysis of a single cell. Nat. Methods. 6 (5), 377–382 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Patel, A. P. et al. Single-cell RNA-seq highlights intratumoral heterogeneity in primary g Lioblastoma. Science 344 (6190), 1396–1401 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  30. D’Avola, D. et al. High-density single cell mRNA sequencing to characterize Circulating t Umor cells in hepatocellular carcinoma. Sci. Rep. 8 (1), 11570 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kim, K-T. et al. Application of single-cell RNA sequencing in optimizing a combinatoria l therapeutic strategy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Genome Biol. 17, 80 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Chung, W. et al. Single-cell RNA-seq enables comprehensive tumour and immune cell Profi Ling in primary breast cancer. Nat. Commun. 8, 15081 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Min, J-W. et al. Identification of distinct tumor subpopulations in lung adenocarcinoma via Single-Cell RNA-seq. PLoS One. 10 (8), e0135817 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Hao, Y. et al. Integrated analysis of multimodal single-cell data. Cell 184 (13), 3573–3587e3529 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Khaliq, A. M. et al. Refining colorectal cancer classification and clinical stratification through a single-cell atlas. Genome Biol. 23 (1), 113 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Langfelder, P. & Horvath, S. WGCNA: an R package for weighted correlation network analysis. BMC Bioinform. 9, 559 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Hänzelmann, S., Castelo, R. & Guinney, J. GSVA: gene set variation analysis for microarray and RNA-seq data. BMC Bioinform. 14, 7 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Simon, N., Friedman, J., Hastie, T. & Tibshirani, R. Regularization paths for cox’s proportional hazards model via coordina Te descent. J. Stat. Softw. 39 (5), 1–13 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Kanehisa, M., Furumichi, M., Sato, Y., Matsuura, Y. & Ishiguro-Watanabe, M. KEGG: biological systems database as a model of the real world. Nucleic Acids Res. 53 (D1), D672–D677 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Kanehisa, M. Toward Understanding the origin and evolution of cellular organisms. Protein Sci. 28 (11), 1947–1951 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Kanehisa, M. & Goto, S. KEGG: Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 28 (1), 27–30 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Love, M. I., Huber, W. & Anders, S. Moderated Estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data Wi Th DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15 (12), 550 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Yerukala Sathipati, S., Sahu, D., Huang, H-C., Lin, Y. & Ho, S-Y. Identification and characterization of the LncRNA signature associated with overall survival in patients with neuroblastoma. Sci. Rep. 9 (1), 5125 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Xue, M. Y. & Cao, H. X. LINC01551 promotes metastasis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma through Targ Eting microRNA-132-5p. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 24 (7), 3724–3733 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Ramírez-Vidal, L. et al. Peripherical blood hsa-miR-335-5p quantification as a Prognostic, but not Diagnostic, marker of gastric cancer. Diagnostics (Basel). 14 (15), 1614 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Ni, X., Xie, J. K., Wang, H. & Song, H. R. Knockdown of long non-coding RNA LINC00324 inhibits proliferation, Mig ration and invasion of colorectal cancer cell via targeting miR-214-3p. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 23 (24), 10740–10750 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Hajebi Khaniki, S., Shokoohi, F., Esmaily, H. & Kerachian, M. A. Analyzing aberrant DNA methylation in colorectal cancer uncovered Inta Ngible heterogeneity of gene effects in the survival time of patients. Sci. Rep. 13 (1), 22104 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Christodoulou, S. et al. MicroRNA-675-5p overexpression is an independent prognostic molecular biomarker of Short-Term relapse and poor overall survival in colorecta l cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 24 (12), 9990 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Eagle, S. R. et al. Evaluating targeted therapeutic response with predictive Blood-Based B iomarkers in patients with chronic mild traumatic brain injury. Neurotrauma Rep. 4 (1), 404–409 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Tremblay MG, Sibai DS, Valère M, Mars J-C, Lessard F, Hori RT, Khan MM, Stefanovsky VY, Ledoux MS, Moss T: Bidirectional cooperation between Ubtf1 and SL1 determines RNA Polymerase I promoter recognition in cell and is negatively affected in the UBTF-E210K neuroregression syndrome. bioRxiv 2021:2021.2006.2007.447350.

  51. Chen, H-F. et al. TAF1B depletion leads to apoptotic cell death by inducing nucleolar St Ress and activating p53-miR-101 circuit in hepatocellular carcinoma. Front. Oncol. 13, 1203775 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Tang, L., Guo, C., Li, X., Zhang, B. & Huang, L. TAF15 promotes cell proliferation, migration and invasion of gastric c ancer via activation of the RAF1/MEK/ERK signalling pathway. Sci. Rep. 13 (1), 5846 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Rocha, M. L., Schmid, K. W. & Czapiewski, P. The prevalence of DNA microsatellite instability in anaplastic thyroid carcinoma - systematic review and discussion of current therapeutic o Ptions. Contemp. Oncol. (Pozn). 25 (3), 213–223 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Apostolou, S., Murthy, S. S., Kolachana, P., Jhanwar, S. C. & Testa, J. R. Absence of post-transcriptional RNA modifications of BCL10 in human Ma lignant mesothelioma and colorectal cancer. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 30 (1), 96–98 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Qin, H. et al. Integration of ubiquitination-related genes in predictive signatures f or prognosis and immunotherapy response in sarcoma. Front. Oncol. 14, 1446522 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Perkins, N. Abstract SY06-04: regulation of cancer cell proliferation and survival by NF-κB. Cancer Res. 74 (19_Supplement), SY06–SY04 (2014). -SY.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Kumar, S. et al. Author correction: Dll1 + quiescent tumor stem cells drive chemoresista Nce in breast cancer through NF-κB survival pathway. Nat. Commun. 13 (1), 3927 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Xu, J. et al. Biochanin A Suppresses Tumor Progression and PD-L1 Expression via Inhi biting ZEB1 Expression in Colorectal Cancer. J Oncol 2022:3224373. (2022).

  59. Zhu, X. et al. Tumor-associated macrophage-specific CD155 contributes to M2-phenotype transition, immunosuppression, and tumor progression in colorectal Ca Ncer. J. Immunother Cancer. 10 (9), e004219 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Frost, T. C. et al. YAP1 and WWTR1 expression inversely correlates with neuroendocrine Mar Kers in Merkel cell carcinoma. J. Clin. Invest. 133 (5), e157171 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Thompson, B. J. YAP/TAZ: drivers of tumor Growth, Metastasis, and resistance to therap y. Bioessays 42 (5), e1900162 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Prat, A. et al. Development and validation of the new HER2DX assay for predicting path ological response and survival outcome in early-stage HER2-positive Br East cancer. EBioMedicine 75, 103801 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Chen, Y-L. et al. Depletion of regulatory T lymphocytes reverses the Imbalance between p ro- and anti-tumor Immunities via enhancing antigen-specific T cell Im mune responses. PLoS One. 7 (10), e47190 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Lam, J. H. et al. CD30+ OX40+ Treg is associated with improved over all survival in colorectal cancer. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 70 (8), 2353–2365 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Oliveira, G. & Wu, C. J. Dynamics and specificities of T cells in cancer immunotherapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 23 (5), 295–316 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Fehérvari, Z. & Sakaguchi, S. CD4 + Tregs and immune control. J. Clin. Invest. 114 (9), 1209–1217 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Gabrilovich, D. I. & Nagaraj, S. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells as regulators of the immune system. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 9 (3), 162–174 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Gabrilovich, D. I., Ostrand-Rosenberg, S. & Bronte, V. Coordinated regulation of myeloid cells by tumours. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 12 (4), 253–268 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Zhou, D. et al. Promising landscape for regulating macrophage polarization: epigenetic viewpoint. Oncotarget 8 (34), 57693–57706 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Yang, G. et al. Quantitative analysis of differential proteome expression in epithelia l-to-Mesenchymal transition of bladder epithelial cells using SILAC me thod. Molecules 21 (1), 84 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Aguilera, R. et al. Heat-shock induction of tumor-derived danger signals mediates rapid mo nocyte differentiation into clinically effective dendritic cells. Clin. Cancer Res. 17 (8), 2474–2483 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Lork, M., Staal, J. & Beyaert, R. Ubiquitination and phosphorylation of the CARD11-BCL10-MALT1 signaloso me in T cells. Cell. Immunol. 340, 103877 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  73. Yang, D., Zhao, X. & Lin, X. Bcl10 is required for the development and suppressive function of Foxp 3+ regulatory T cells. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 18 (1), 206–218 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  74. Casper, M. et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma as extracolonic manifestation of Lynch syndro me indicates Sect. 63 as potential target gene in hepatocarcinogenesis. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 48 (3), 344–351 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This project was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82260543), Natural Science Foundation of Ningxia (2023AAC05058, 2024AAC03557), and Scientific Research Foundation of Fujian Provincial Hospital, China (No.2020YJ04).

Author information

Author notes
  1. Zijing Wang, Liyuan Ma and Jinzhong Cao contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. First Clinical Medical College, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, 804 Shengli Road, Yinchuan, 750004, China

    Zijing Wang, Jinzhong Cao, Ruxue Ma, Hengyi Lv & Zixin Zhang

  2. Department of Ultrasonography, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, 750004, China

    Liyuan Ma

  3. Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China

    Shengtao Lin

  4. Department of Surgical Oncology, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou350001, China

    Shengtao Lin

  5. Department of Anal-Colorectal Surgery, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, 804 Shengli Road, Yinchuan, 750004, China

    Jiang Wang & Tao Jiang

Authors
  1. Zijing Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Liyuan Ma
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jinzhong Cao
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Shengtao Lin
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ruxue Ma
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jiang Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Hengyi Lv
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Zixin Zhang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Tao Jiang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

The research was planned by TJ. The data was analyzed and the original article was written by ZJW and LYM. JZC and STL were responsible for the in vitro experimental validation and contributed to data analysis and interpretation. RXM and JW gathered references and reviewed the paper. The data was gathered by HYL and ZXZ. The final manuscript was reviewed and approved by all authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tao Jiang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical approval and consent to participate

Written informed consent was obtained from each patient before surgery and all study protocols were approved by the Ethics Committee for Clinical Research of General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University (Reference Number : KYLL-2022-0800). All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations/Declaration of Helsinki.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Supplementary Material 2

Supplementary Material 3

Supplementary Material 4

Supplementary Material 5

Supplementary Material 6

Supplementary Material 7

Supplementary Material 8

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Z., Ma, L., Cao, J. et al. A pseudouridine-related prognostic model of colorectal cancer based on single-cell sequencing analysis and transcriptome analysis. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-34933-0

Download citation

  • Received: 19 August 2025

  • Accepted: 31 December 2025

  • Published: 04 January 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-34933-0

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Colorectal cancer
  • Pseudouridine-related genes
  • Immune
  • Single-cell
  • Prognosis
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing: Cancer

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Cancer newsletter — what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Cancer