Abstract
Growth in online impulsive buying and digital advertising have drawn the attention of researchers in developed countries, but it is still in its early stages, especially in China. China is positioned to overtake the world as the nation with the highest volume of online purchases owing to a variety of growth-related variables, including impulsive purchases. Surprisingly, there is a deficiency in the holistic understanding of Chinese customers in different age groups regarding the links between advertising value and online impulsive buying behavior. Thus, to advance the line of research, this study intends to determine the connection between advertising value and online impulse buying behavior along with the indirect connection between the urge to buy impulsively and moderation of anxiety. To achieve this objective, data were obtained from 1422 online consumers. Data analysis was performed using structural equation modeling. The results confirm that informativeness, credibility, creativity, entertainment, integration, and the urge to buy online significantly and consequently urge to buy online positively influence online impulsive buying among Chinese consumers. Surprisingly, this interaction was statistically insignificant. Furthermore, the proposed moderator, customer anxiety, also showed no moderating impact on the urge to buy online impulsively and online impulsive buying behavior. The mediation result suggests that urge to buy impulsively significantly mediates the relationship between informativeness, credibility, creativity, entertainment, and integration with online impulse buying behavior, except for interaction and online impulse buying behavior. These findings contribute theoretically by adding new information about Chinese motivational factors for impulsive buying. Empirically, it adds value to marketers, advertisers, and online retailers by considering informativeness, creativity, entertainment, integration, and the urge to buy online while communicating with Chinese consumers at all customer touch points.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The world is experiencing a paradigm shift from offline to online shopping as a consequence of e-commerce success (Zhao et al., 2022). Consequently, consumers’ interest in buying online is growing (Charm et al., 2020), which is also leading people to make impulsive online purchases (Zhao et al., 2022). Impulsive buying can be defined as a behavior that involves an unexpected purchase, followed by intense joy and excitement (Stern, 1962). With the advent of technology during the last two decades, companies have shifted towards modern forms of marketing to motivate people to purchase without any prior planning (Bellini et al., 2017). Building on Bellini et al.’s perspective, Redine et al. (2022) point out that innovation has made shopping effortless, and consequently, unplanned buying has become even more enjoyable. Impulsive purchases have attracted the attention of researchers (Bucklin and Lattin, 1991; Donovan et al., 1994) since the 90s to encourage people to engage in offline impulsive shopping. Thus, online impulse buying has become an epidemic owing to the progress of information technology and e-commerce (Munawaroh et al., 2022).
Consequently, online impulsive buying is becoming increasingly ubiquitous in the e-commerce industry (Zhao et al., 2022). Furthermore, online impulsive buying occurs when a buyer feels the desire to buy a service or product without carefully considering whether it is needed (Chen et al., 2017). Moreover, spontaneous purchasing has resulted in a larger share of sales in the contemporary retail sector (Sundström et al., 2019). In this ever-increasing e-commerce world in which the total sale of online shopping was estimated at 5.4 trillion US dollars in 2021, customers often make unplanned and spontaneous buying decisions (Gulfraz et al., 2022). This behavior is known as impulsive online buying (Wu et al., 2020) and it accounts for ~40% of all online transactions (Chen et al., 2017). By contrast, people who make impulsive purchases could feel instant pleasure and satisfaction, but doing so can have serious negative effects, including debt, a low sense of self-worth, and discontent (Luo et al., 2021). In addition, developing countries are experiencing an increase in household income; this is true for China as well, and this, along with intensive marketing, gives rise to impulsive buying in China (Sheng and Basha, 2022). The number of online shoppers in China reached 840 million by December 2022. As the world’s largest market for online retail, China’s online retail sales in 2022 reached 13,79 trillion CNY and have continued to grow steadily over the past few years (China Internet Network Information Center, 2023). In addition, according to a McKinsey report, Chinese consumers are more likely to make impulsive purchases than consumers from other nations (McKinsey and Company, 2020). E-commerce’s convenience has led to the transformation of the online shopping mode, which is causing China’s current situation of impulse buying to become increasingly prevalent.
Further, with the rise in advertising on online platforms such as social media (Munawaroh et al., 2022), it has become critical to understand how advertising values affect the Chinese people’s urge to buy impulsively (UI) and eventual purchases. However, in recent years the studies on impulse buying have increased all around the world (Um et al., 2022). Despite the rise in impulsive purchasing in China, research on the influence of advertising values on impulsive buying is still fragmented and scarce than that in developed nation (Chen and Zhang, 2015; She et al., 2021). Therefore, there is a critical need for further research that specifically focuses on the influence of social integration in advertising and its implications for impulsive buying behavior in the Chinese consumer market. By studying with a comprehensive research framework, we can gain valuable insights into the dynamics of impulsive buying behavior and provide meaningful implications for marketers and advertisers targeting Chinese consumers.
Prior studies have indicated the influence of advertising value on the consumer’s buying behavior, these studies have partially emphasized the diverse forms of inherent advertising value. Ducoffe (1995) conducted an assessment of the efficacy of advertisements, utilizing three distinct dimensions: informativeness, irritation, and entertainment. Zha et al. (2015) selected informativeness and entertainment as the dimensions of advertising value in their study on the impact of ad value on user attitudes in the online shopping context in China. Researchers in the field have incorporated advertising value attributes such as credibility and creativity into their investigations of the impact of advertising value on impulsive buying behavior (Malafe et al., 2023). As the medium of information undergoes further evolution, the intrinsic value of advertising as an abstract concept is becoming increasingly enriched. Therefore, in certain specific situations, certain critical factors of advertising value may be disregarded. Thus, there is a lack of comprehensive studies regarding the behavior of a wider Chinese audience that includes all people over 18 years of age, as most studies focus on a specific group of people, such as students (Luo et al., 2021; She et al., 2021; Liu et al., 2023a).
Considerable efforts have been made to identify the factors that motivate people to make an impulsive purchase; these factors include self-steam, risk preference, social isolation (Luo et al., 2021), scarcity, shopping value, hedonic dimensions (Akram et al., 2018), dimensions of social presence (Ming et al., 2021), perceived trust, use, perceived value, and promotion incentive (Zhang et al., 2022). However, there is a lack of empirical proof linking advertising values and online impulsive buying. Additionally, customer anxiety has been studied in previous studies (Nagar and Gandotra, 2016; Hackbarth et al., 2003; Joiner et al., 2013) as mediating variables, with the exception of a few studies (Bousbahi and Alrazgan, 2015; Khoa and Huynh, 2022) which studied customer anxiety as a moderator in online shopping adoption. In addition, customer anxiety has been used as a moderator in brand loyalty to form customer loyalty (Mouakket & Al-hawari, 2012). However, less is known about the moderating effect of customer anxiety in establishing the connection between the UI and online impulsive buying, particularly in the Chinese settings. Thus, there is a need for more comprehensive research on online impulsive buying in China.
Also, the relationship between social integration and the intention to engage in impulsive purchases is an area of ongoing investigation in the field of consumer behavior. Existing studies present divergent findings regarding the impact of social integration in advertising on impulsive buying behavior. Some research suggests that social integration can enhance the intention to engage in impulsive buying, as demonstrated by Wei et al. (2021). Conversely, other studies, such as the work by Kacen and Lee (2002), reveal a complex relationship between social integration and impulsive buying, with outcomes contingent on the specific product being advertised. Consequently, further research is necessary to validate and gain a comprehensive understanding of these relationships.
Hence, this study aims to bridge the current gap in the literature and to examine the relationship between advertising value, customer anxiety, and impulsive buying behavior in China. The research conducted in this study holds significant implications for the field. By investigating the relationships between various factors such as informativeness, credibility, creativity, entertainment, interaction, integration, and the UI, the study contributes to a deeper understanding of consumer behavior in the context of online impulse buying. The findings shed light on the specific indirect effects of these factors on online impulse buying behavior, highlighting their individual contributions. Additionally, the research identifies the role of customer anxiety as a potential moderating variable in the relationship between certain factors and online impulse buying behavior. These insights have practical implications for marketers and advertisers in designing effective strategies to influence consumer behavior and drive impulsive buying online. Overall, the research significantly enhances our knowledge of the factors influencing online impulse buying behavior and provides valuable insights for both academia and industry. This study comprises seven sections: introduction (Section 1), theoretical background and hypothesis development (Section 2), methodology (Section 3), data analysis and findings (Section 4), critical discussion (Section 5), practical and theoretical implications (6), and conclusion and limitation (Section 7).
Theoretical background & hypothesis development
The Stimulus-Organism-Response (S-O-R) model and online impulsive buying
The S-O-R model posits that stimuli are environmental cues that have an impact on individuals’ cognitive and emotional reactions, resulting in behavior (Mehrabian and Russell, 1974). S-O-R demonstrates that environmental stimuli have the ability to influence individuals’ internal cognitive or affective states, which motivate them to respond to a particular action (Xu et al., 2020). This study adopts the S-O-R framework as it has been extensively applied to assess online consumer behavior in various contexts (Leong et al., 2022): social commerce (Chen et al., 2017), e-commerce (Leong et al., 2022), e-tailing sites (Karim et al., 2021), and live streaming (Lee and Chen, 2021). In addition, the S-O-R framework is a well-organized model in regards to structuring variables to test how stimuli impact organisms, ultimately leading to consumers’ final responses (Chen et al., 2021). However, the use of the S-O-R framework is still limited in the Chinese context which combines advertising values (informativeness, credibility, creativity, entertainment, integration, and interactivity), especially with customer anxiety as a moderator. For example, Ming et al. (2021) incorporated the S-O-R framework to investigate impulsive buying in live streaming in the case of China. They mainly tested social presence and telepresence variables, and their impact on impulsive buying. Akrama et al., (2017) also conducted research on China regarding impulsive buying using the S-O-R framework as a theoretical base. The constructs used were perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and motivational factors. In addition, their research was confined to four Chinese cities. Liu et al., (2023b) used the S-O-R model to determine the influence of legitimacy issues on live stream commerce and purchase intention in China. Thus, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, very little work has been done using the S-O-R framework as a theoretical foundation with advertising values, while using customer anxiety as a moderator.
As Stimuli, the S-O-R framework accommodates the multidimensional nature of advertising values. Advertising values, such as informativeness, credibility, creativity, entertainment, interaction, and integration, can be seen as external stimuli that elicit cognitive and affective responses from individuals, which subsequently influence their impulsive buying behavior. The S-O-R theory highlights the importance of understanding how advertising values stimulate and influence the internal states of individuals, which ultimately lead to their behavioral responses. The organism, which represents individuals’ internal processes, plays a crucial role in mediating the effects of intention between advertising values and impulsive buying behavior. Individuals’ cognitive and affective responses, including attitudes, emotions, and motivations, are influenced by the advertising values they encounter. For instance, an entertaining advertisement may evoke positive intentions and capture individuals’ attention, leading to a more favorable attitude toward the product and increasing the likelihood of impulsive buying behavior. Ultimately, the S-O-R framework links the advertising values and individuals’ internal processes to their behavioral responses, specifically online impulsive buying behavior. By examining this relationship, researchers can gain insights into how advertising values shape consumers’ cognitive and affective responses, and how these responses translate into impulsive buying decisions in the online context. Therefore, the S-O-R framework provides a solid theoretical foundation for understanding the intricate dynamics between advertising values, individuals’ internal processes, and their online impulsive buying behavior, contributing to the advancement of knowledge in the field of consumer behavior and marketing research. Thus, the present study extends the usage of the S-O-R framework in the setting of advertising values while studying a broader audience in China.
Online impulsive buying
The term, impulse buying, was widespread around the 1940s when some researchers defined buyers’ unintended buying and quick transactions as such (Aragoncillo and Orus, 2018). There are three characteristics of impulsive buying: it is unpredictable, and it occurs suddenly; it is short in terms of time duration; and customers develop an intention buy impulsively, but they may not actually do so due to several other factors (Geol et al., 2022a). Surprisingly, the advancement of impulsive e-commerce buying can be marked in the online shopping mode (Akram et al., 2018). Furthermore, impulsive buying is more convenient, and people are more likely to make impulsive purchases online than that in stores (Chen et al., 2017). The factors affecting online impulsive buying can be either internal or external. The internal factors may include compulsive buying tendencies, materialism (Lim et al., 2020) brand attachment (Lim et al., 2020) and enjoyed (hedonistic) buying intentions (Chen et al. 2017), whereas the external factors may include utilitarian and hedonic values (Lim et al. 2020), checkout option within Instagram (Han, 2023), and the promotions and marketing techniques used by companies (Iyer et al., 2022). However, Cakanlar and Nguyen (2019) point out that impulsive buying is more influenced by emotive than cognitive stages. Their findings further confirm the work of Verhagen and Van Dolen (2011). Rook (1987) defines impulsive buying as an unplanned and immediate purchase behavior. A recent definition by Parsad (2020) suggests that an impulsive buying pattern that occurs when customers go through an expected, strong, and consistent impulse to purchase something instantly. In impulsive buying, online consumers may instantly obtain information about offered goods and services while using the Internet, and instantly decide to make an immediate purchase (Lina et al., 2022). In this study, online impulsive buying behavior refers to the spontaneous and unplanned act of purchasing products online driven by impulsive urges or desires. It involves feeling an unprompted urge to buy products, unintentionally making purchases, acting on the spur of the moment, buying rashly without careful consideration, and being inclined to make immediate purchases upon seeing a product. Online impulse buying occurs without external influence, prior intention, or conscious planning, and often disregards long-term consequences or financial considerations.
Informativeness and UI
Informativeness refers to the capability of online sellers to produce and demonstrate resourceful and helpful information to consumers in a simple manner (Hoffman and Novak, 1996). Advertisement informativeness in the context of online impulsive buying behavior refers to the extent to which advertisements provide relevant, timely, accurate, and valuable information about products or services. It focuses on the informational content of online advertisements and their role in informing and educating consumers in the context of impulsive buying. They provide consumers with information about the features, functions, uses, and benefits of the advertised offerings, enabling them to make informed decisions regarding impulsive purchases. The timeliness includes informing consumers about new releases, limited-time offers, discounts, or any other time-sensitive information that may impact their impulsive buying decisions. The result of greater exposure time and the value of easily available information that consumers receive on websites grab attention and engage customers to take further action (Lin et al., 2018). Thus, how information about products and services is being framed is very important for effective marketing to ensure that customers have the urge to click and buy on impulse (Waymer et al., 2022). Hidayat (2022) proved that customers are more likely to research further and make purchases right away when they receive helpful information about goods and services in an easy manner through advertising. A similar statement was proposed by Özturk et al., (2021), which is remarkably informative in advertising about the offering of products and influences consumers to urge to buy the products immediately. Thus, well-informative content translates into click-through rates, and eventually, the UI. For example, ads on social media platforms must provide new information to consumers so that they can easily understand it (Rahayu et al., 2020). Malafe et al., (2023) contend that poorly provided information may break consumers’ flow of online purchases, which may not result in an spontaneous intention to buy. Thus, we propose the following hypothesis:
H1: Informativeness is positively related to the urge to buy impulsively among online buyers in China.
Credibility and UI
Credibility in advertising is the audiences’ perception of reliability, honesty, trust, and confidence (MacKenzie and Lutz, 1989). In the context of online impulsive buying, advertisement credibility refers to the overall trustworthiness and impact of online advertisements on consumer behavior. It includes factors such as how persuasive the ads are, the extent to which they are considered believable, their effectiveness in influencing decisions, their usefulness as a reference for purchasing products, and how convincing they are in driving impulsive purchases. All these elements combined shape the perception of advertisement credibility and play a role in influencing consumers’ impulsive buying behavior in the online realm. According to Lafferty and Goldsmith (1999), advertising credibility is a key factor that influences consumer behavior. The credibility of advertising can come from several resources; for instance, Wang et al. (2017) found that celebrity endorsement has a significant effect on consumers because of its trustworthiness, because the advertising information comes from a widely trusted person. Previous studies (Li and Suh, 2015; Zhu et al., 2020) have established that credibility can determine the next action of customers that involve finding further information and eventually intending to purchase (Mursid, 2021). Qiu et al. (2021) further confirmed that for consumers, the credibility of the message is the most important factor influencing their purchase behavior. Thus, there is a significant and positive link between credibility and the urgency to purchase impulsively (Shamim and Islam, 2022). Yan et al. (2022) confirmed that credibility of trustworthy sources in advertising influences consumers’ UI. Consistent with the above findings, Mursid (2021) established that credibility is significantly and positively associated with UI. Mert et al. (2021) claimed that advertisements affect the UI based on their credibility; a higher level of credibility leads to a higher UI. This argument postulates the following hypothesis:
H2: Credibility is positively related to the urge to buy impulsively among online buyers in China.
Creativity and UI
The art of effective advertising involves creativity, which has the potential to extract the most impressive message to influence consumers regarding impulse purchases. Advertising creativity in online impulsive buying refers to the originality and innovation in advertising content that makes it visually appealing, engaging, unusual, and unexpected. It involves attractive visuals and designs that captivate the attention of online consumers. Creative advertisements employ unique ideas and storytelling techniques to stand out and influence impulsive buying decisions. Unusual and unexpected advertising breaks away from norms, challenging assumptions and generating curiosity. Effective creative advertisements also address consumers’ needs, providing targeted solutions and relevant information that influence impulsive buying behavior. Several other studies (Moes et al., 2022b; Schwarz, 2022; Munawaroh et al., 2022) have pointed out that creativity in advertisements can attract the attention of consumers and retain it, consequently leading them to make instant purchases. Thus, creativity in ads can have a considerable impact on UI. A similar argument was made by Mead et al., (2020) that creative visual presentation has a positive connection with the urge to buy immediately. Chen et al., (2021) confirmed Mead et al.’s outcomes that shoppers who visited online retail stores made impulsive purchases as a result of strong and creative visualization of products and servicing. Malafe et al., (2023) find that creative presentation of products has a higher impact on impulse purchases. Thus, alluring promotional offers through creative advertising encourages online consumers to buy products and feel the pleasure immediately (Kaur et al., 2022). Thus, we propose the following hypothesis:
H3: Creativity is positively related to the urge to buy impulsively among online buyers in China.
Entertainment and UI
Shopping is a latent entertainment that is reflected by the hedonic tendency that can be observed by heightened stimulation and association, as online shopping has become an entertainment (Vidya and Selvamani, 2019). The purpose of entertainment through advertising is to keep the audience interested and make consumers feel happy about certain products and services (Lu et al., 2022). Zhang et al., (2023) also mention that online buyers with a hedonic orientation look for unique experiences that enhance their joy of shopping online. Advertising entertainment in the context of online impulsive buying behavior refers to advertisements that create a pleasant and enjoyable experience for consumers. These advertisements evoke positive emotions, provide relaxation, and stimulate the mind. Consumers actively seek out advertisements for entertainment purposes, valuing the enjoyment they derive from them. Engaging and thought-provoking advertisements that capture attention and pique curiosity have the potential to influence impulsive buying decisions. When consumers find advertisements interesting, they are more likely to pay attention, remember the brand, and consider making impulsive purchases. Previous studies have pointed out that entertainment has positive cognitive and affective advertising values (Xu et al., 2020). Thus, entertainment is a critical factor that influences UI (Abdelsalam et al., 2020). A considerable number of studies have also confirmed that the entertainment value of advertising creates UI commodities (Wiranata and Hananto, 2020). Furthermore, advertising can be enjoyable, entertaining, and fun, which can directly create the intention to buy a commodity (Czarnecka and Schivinski, 2019). In addition, people use online platforms for shopping not only for information but also for perceived enjoyment (Lee and Chen, 2021). For example, Rajan (2020) argues that e-retailers use entertainment factors to spark consumers’ attention towards a particular product or service and create an urge to buy. Lavuri (2023) also confirmed that consumer entertainment is directly connected to UI. In addition to that, Yi and Jai (2020) suggested that entertainment values are correlated with individuals’ feelings and psychosocial motivations of online consumers’ positive emotions, and this create a UI. Therefore, we formulate the following hypothesis:
H4: Entertainment is positively linked to the urge to buy impulsively among online buyers in China.
Interactivity and UI
Interactivity is the user’s perception of participation in timely communication with mediated individuals (Labrecque, 2014). Advertising interaction in case of online impulsive buying behavior context refers to the personalized connection and engagement between consumers and advertisements. It includes the perception of advertisements directly addressing individual needs and desires, enhancing consumer engagement and potentially influencing impulsive buying behavior. Consumers view advertising as a means to improve their quality of life, with interactive advertisements offering innovative solutions that can elevate their standard of living. Interactive elements in advertisements, such as clickable buttons and engaging visuals, increase consumer eagerness to interact and explore, leading to a higher likelihood of impulsive buying. Advertisements that resonate with consumers’ values and experiences create a sense of identification and emotional connection, impacting impulsive buying behavior. Additionally, advertising assists consumers in making informed decisions by providing brand comparisons, product information, and pricing details, guiding impulsive buying choices. The interactive atmosphere in online communities influences community consciousness and encourages consumers to make immediate purchases without planning (Zafar et al., 2020). Thus, a higher level of interaction with online retailers can create a sense of enjoyment. Gligor and Bozkurt (2021) identified that people are more likely to purchase impulsively if the online seller brand is highly interactive. For example, Huang (2016) stated that when consumers surf social networking sites or brand websites, they encounter the shared experience and interaction of the brands in the form of reviews, which eventually catches the eyes and fosters an immediate urge to buy the same. Recently, an increasing number of researchers (Li et al., 2014; Chen and Yao, 2018; Zhang et al., 2019) have investigated and established a connection between interactivity and consumers’ buying decisions. According to Zhang and Wei (2019), interactions among online communities considerably impact consumers’ OIB. For example, online retailers’ website interactivity can influence and persuade online consumers to make impulse purchase decisions (Chen et al., 2022). Their findings are supported by previous work (Huang, 2016; Xiang et al., 2016), which also found that increasing exposure to information and interactions on online platforms have a substantial influence on UI. Moreover, when online users browse an unfamiliar e-commerce website, they take further action based on their ability to communicate, collaborate, and personalize the interactivity of the platforms, which can lead to an urge to make an impulse purchase. Thus, we propose the following hypothesis:
H5: Interactivity positively influences the urge to buy impulsively among online buyers in China.
Integration and UI
Social integration in terms of advertising refers to the integration of advertising messages into platforms using social media and the usage of social media influencers, user-generated content, and other social media marketing tactics to increase the reach and impact of advertising messages. The value of this integration lies in its ability to reach a large and engaged audience in a more personalized and trustworthy manner, leading to greater brand awareness, brand loyalty, and ultimately, sales. Kacen and Lee (2002) remarked that the connection between social integration and impulsive buying is complex and depends on the type of product being advertised. The study found that social integration of advertising is more likely to increase the intention to engage in impulsive buying for low-involvement products such as snacks and candy, but is less likely to impact high-involvement products such as cars or electronics.
Advertising integration in the context of online impulsive buying behavior involves the alignment and connection between the advertised brand and the consumer’s self-perception, aspirations, and desired identity. Advertising that reflects the consumer’s self-image, caters to their needs, supports their personal growth, creates personal connections, and enhances their reputation and status can influence impulsive buying behavior by resonating with their values, aspirations, and desired identity. The social integration of advertising can increase the likelihood of impulsive buying by generating a strong emotional link between the brand and consumer through personalized and engaging content. This emotional connection can trigger impulsive buying behavior, as the consumer feels a strong urge to purchase a product. However, it is vital to note that social integration can also have the opposite effect and discourage impulsive buying behavior. For example, if advertising messages are perceived as inauthentic or overly pushed, they may lead to negative brand associations and decrease the likelihood of impulsive buying. The satisfaction of “social interaction” is considered to come from strong interpersonal communication (Ha et al., 2015). Research on online advertising shows that social interaction is positively correlated with human-to-human interactions (Swanson, 1979). Previous research shows that social integration mainly displays a positive influence in advertising settings (Taylor et al., 2011). Social integration has a positive effect on advertising (Wei et al., 2021), which affects consumers’ impulse buying behavior. Therefore, considering that advertising messages are perceived as authentic, the following hypothesis is proposed:
H6: Integration positively influences the urge to buy impulsively among online buyers in China.
UI and Online Impulse Buying Behavior (OIB)
UI is a state of desire observed when individuals encounter an object in a particular situation (Beatty and Ferrell, 1998, p. 172). The UI in online impulsive buying behavior refers to the spontaneous desire to make unplanned purchases while browsing ads or encountering products online. It includes feeling compelled to buy items unrelated to initial shopping goals, being tempted by unplanned items, exceeding intended shopping goals, and making immediate purchases based on personal preference. Browsing experiences trigger impulsive desires, leading individuals to consider and buy products not originally planned. Although unplanned buying and impulsive buying indicates instant buying, they are not same in consumer behavior. The key difference lies in the underlying motivations and decision-making processes. Unplanned purchases are made without prior intention but may still involve a rational evaluation of the product’s value or relevance. In contrast, impulsive purchases are characterized by a lack of rational deliberation and are driven by immediate emotional impulses or desires. It is crucial to understand and manage this urge to ensure informed and deliberate purchasing decisions online. Kazempour and Lotfizadeh (2017) mentioned that UI is a sudden, complicated, compulsive, and attractive buying behavior that usually occurs in the process of decision making which leads to an impulsive purchase. Thus, Chen et al., (2017) contended that consumers first experience an urge to make an impulsive purchase, and then they actually implement the behavior of impulse purchase. Thus, a high propensity for UI occurs because of excessive interest in a particular commodity (Zhang et al., 2022), which is usually based on non-reflective thinking connected with the features of products and services, which drives an immediate desire to have pleasure and eventually make a purchase (Xu et al., 2020). Thus, people with greater UI are more likely to make impulsive purchases than those with a low UI (Foroughi et al., 2013). Previous studies (Shen and Khalifa, 2012; Zheng et al., 2020) have demonstrated that UI has a significant influence on OIB. These findings were further validated by Song (2022), who found that UI and OIB are significantly connected. Thus, we propose the following hypothesis:
H7: The urge to buy impulsively positively influences the online impulse buying behavior among Chinese consumers.
Moderating effect of customer anxiety
Customer anxiety can be defined as individuals’ personal consumption that sometimes provoke anxiety because of the perception that others will judge their consumption decisions negatively (Compeau et al., 1999). Customer anxiety in the context of online impulsive buying behavior refers to the heightened emotions of nervousness, unease, intrusion, fear, sadness, and panic experienced during the purchase process. It encompasses feeling more anxious than usual, perceiving advertising as intrusive, experiencing unfounded fear, becoming easily sad or panicky, and feeling emotionally scattered. These emotions are triggered by the impulsive nature of buying decisions, the perceived intrusion of advertising, irrational fears, and the pressure to make quick choices. Addressing customer anxiety is crucial for fostering a positive and supportive online shopping experience. As reported by Nagar and Gandotra (2016), online customers are more likely to be reluctant to buy commodities because they perceive privacy risks regarding their credit card information, and that e-commerce sites are not safe. Khoa and Huynh (2022) confirmed Gehl’s (2021) findings, stating that customer anxiety is more likely to occur when people purchase online. Ding and Lu (2017) also argued that the effect of information can overload customers, and customers may experience physical and mental fatigue, and lose interest or become less motivated to purchase instantly. Previous studies (Osswald et al., 2012; Bousbahi and Alrazgan, 2015) have also confirmed these findings, and based on this argument, it can be said that regardless of an urge to buy online instantly, the anxiety of customers can significantly change the scenario, and impact whether the customers will finish their impulsive buying or become reluctant. Furthermore, considerable research has acknowledged that UI has a significant and positive influence on online impulsive purchases (Xiao and Nicholson, 2013; Yu, 2022). However, some scholars have argued that customer anxiety plays a key role in online buying, as during shopping, online customers experience fear, aggression, and apprehension (Vijayasarathy, 2004; Celik, 2011; Miranda and Balqiah, 2020). Previous studies (Ding et al., 2017; Miranda and Balqiah, 2020; Khoa and Huynh, 2022) have also demonstrated that during online shopping, negative thoughts can generate unhealthy emotional and behavioral responses, which eventually affect online purchase. Thus, we propose the following hypothesis:
H8: Customer anxiety moderates the association between the urge to buy impulsively and online impulse buying behavior among Chinese consumers.
The mediating role of UI
Advertising values play an essential role in shaping consumer behavior, as they provide information about products and services, and create the perception of need and desire for them. Several studies have investigated advertising value (Ducoffe and Curlo, 2000; Van-Tien Dao et al., 2014; Zha et al., 2015) and its impact on impulse buying (Malafe et al., 2023). Advertising values such as, informativeness, credibility, entertainment, interaction, and integration influence consumer behavior by triggering impulsive buying behavior through the creation of a UI. The increased level of information provided in informative advertisements can lead to greater excitement and arousal among consumers, which in turn leads to an increased likelihood of impulsive buying behavior (Cakanlar and Nguyen, 2018). Malafe et al., (2023) argue that poorly provided information may break consumers’ flow of online purchases, which may not turn into an immediate urge to buy. Similarly, individuals are more likely to participate in impulsive buying when they perceive the advertisements to be credible (Mursid, 2021). Additionally, UI is positively associated with the perceived credibility of advertisements (Shamim and Islam, 2022). These findings suggest that the perceived credibility of an advertisement influences the level of impulsiveness when making a purchase. When an advertisement is perceived as credible, it increases an individual’s UI, leading to impulsive buying behavior (Mert et al., 2021).
Similarly, individuals are more likely to engage in impulsive buying when they perceive the advertisements to be creative (Schwarz, 2022; Munawaroh et al., 2022). Advertisement’s creativity influences the level of impulsiveness in making a purchase. When an advertisement is perceived as creative, it increases an individual’s UI, leading to impulsive buying behavior. Therefore, UI acts as a mediator between advertising value and online impulse buying behavior. Simultaneously, advertisements perceived as entertaining are more effective in generating impulsive buying behavior. UI is positively associated with the perceived entertainment value of advertisements (Abdelsalam et al., 2020; Wiranata and Hananto, 2020). Yi and Jai (2020) suggested that entertainment values are connected to online consumers’ positive emotions and impulse buying behavior, driven by their feelings and psychosocial motivations. Thus, we can predict that individuals are more likely to participate in impulsive buying when they perceive the advertisements to be entertaining and that they will be induced to purchase impulsively.
Huang (2016) commented that when consumers surf social networking sites or brand websites, they encounter the shared experience and interaction of the brands in the form of reviews, which eventually catches their eyes and fosters an immediate urge to buy the same. Previous research by Xiang et al., (2016) also supports their findings that exposure to information and interactions on online platforms significantly impacts impulse buying intention. Therefore, an advertisement’s perceived interactivity influences the level of impulsiveness in making a purchase (Moes et al., 2022a). When an advertisement is perceived as interactive, it increases an individual’s UI, leading to impulsive buying behavior. Likewise, social integration of advertising can increase the likelihood of impulsive buying by forming a strong emotional connection between the brand and consumer through personalized and engaging content. This emotional connection can foster impulsive buying behavior, as the customer feels a strong intention to purchase the product (Wei et al., 2021). Therefore, we propose that UI mediates the relationship between advertising informativeness, credibility, creativity, entertainment, interaction, integration, and impulsive buying behavior. Thus, the following hypothesis is proposed:
H9–14: The urge to buy impulsively mediates the relationship between informativeness, credibility, creativity, entertainment, interactivity and integration on the online impulse buying behavior among Chinese consumers.
All associations hypothesized above are presented in Fig. 1 below:
Methodology
Research design
This study employed a deductive and quantitative methodology to diagnose the effects of advertising value and online impulse buying behavior among Chinese online consumers. This information was obtained through a cross-sectional study design, meaning that the information was obtained from each participant at one time. To verify these propositions, we used partial least squares-structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) as the analytical approach for causative-predictive data examination.
Sample and population
Adult Chinese online users (aged 18 years and above) constitute the population of the current study. The sample population included those engaged in online shopping in different parts of China. The required sample size was calculated using G* power software. The G* power software was used to assess the minimum sample size (Faul et al., 2007). This study has eight constructs (a power of 0.95 and an effect size of 0.15), and based on that, the minimum sample size proposed by the G* power software is 160.
Data collection
The authors created an electronic questionnaire to collect empirical data by applying the measurement scale items from previous studies. The questionnaire had closed-ended items, in which the nine constructs were evaluated from previous studies using a seven-point Likert scale ranging from 1 “strongly disagree” to 7 “strongly agree.” The survey was conducted in China during January-February, 2023. The empirical data were obtained using the Google form questionnaire survey method. The authors selected the Chinese respondents for collecting data because China is a leading country in the global digital economy, holding around 45% of worldwide transactions on e-commerce platforms (Seong et al., 2021). A preliminary survey of the questionnaire was used to determine the fineness of the questions. Before sending questionnaire, the respondents were informed about the purpose of the study and assured that no individualized data will be disclosed in person, so that it violets the respondents’ rights. In order to ensure that the data gathered for this study originated solely from the intended respondents, one screening question were incorporated into the questionnaire. Additionally, prior to collecting any data, informed (written) consent was obtained from the participants to ensure their voluntary participation in the study and ethical approval. It applied the convenience sampling method. The questionnaire was circulated using social media platforms, mainly WJX.cn (https://www.wjx.cn/vm/Pu9mWoX.aspx#), and a total of 1422 valid responses were received.
Survey instrument
A questionnaire was developed to evaluate the suggested hypotheses regarding advertising value, online impulsive buying behavior, and the moderating role of consumer anxiety. In the first two sections of the survey, questions about demographic information, such as gender, age, employment, location, how frequently people search for products online, and how often they view advertising, were included. The independent constructs from earlier investigations were included in the second section: informativeness (Ducoffe, 1995; Malafe et al., 2023; Cvirka et al., 2022), credibility (Brackett and Carr, 2001; Moutinho et al., 2022), creativity (Lee and Hong, 2016), entertainment (Martins et al., 2019; Sharma et al. 2022), interaction (Liu et al., 2012; Gulfraz et al., 2022), integration (Quan-Haase and Young, 2010; Wei et al., 2021), UI (Xiang et al., 2016; Herzallah et al., 2022; Goel et al., 2022a, 2022b), CA (Martins et al., 2019; Malafe et al., 2023), and OIB (Goel et al., 2022a, 2022b; Tran and Nguyen, 2022). The original English version of the questionnaire was translated into Mandarin for the Chinese respondents and then re-translated into English by experts. The details of the survey questionnaire are provided in Supporting Material S1. Survey Instrument.
Common Method Bias (CMB)
As the data for the constructs were received from an identical source, there was a possibility of a common bias. To ensure clarity and minimize errors that may introduce bias in the data, we implemented specific procedural measures in the questionnaire. These measures included providing explicit definitions of terminology and offering clear and concise instructions for respondents to follow while completing the surveys. To foster an environment of honesty and reduce potential biases, we assured participants that there were no absolute right or wrong responses, and their answers would remain anonymous during assessment. This approach aimed to minimize social desirability bias and common method bias that may arise when respondents feel compelled to provide certain answers. Furthermore, we employed a randomization technique to present the questions in a varied order. This randomization aimed to mitigate the influence of order effects or other biases that can emerge when questions are presented in a predetermined sequence. As a part of statistical measures, Harmna’s single factor test and Kock’s (Kock, 2015) full collinearity test were carried out to perform the CMB analysis. Hence, based on Harman’s test, one factor accounted for 22.05% of the total variance, which was significantly lower than the standard 50%. Additionally, according to Table 1, the values of VIFs obtained from a full collinearity test of each construct are below 3.3, which confirms that the proposed model is unrestricted to CMB (Kock, 2015).
Multivariate normality
The normality of the multivariate data in this study was assessed using the Web Power web tool (Web Power, 2018). The tool calculated the coefficient of skewness and kurtosis for Mardia and produced a p-value of 0.000, which is less than 0.05, indicating the presence of multivariate non-normality (Cain et al., 2017).
Data analysis method
The decision to employ PLS-SEM in this study was driven by the presence of multivariate non-normality in the dataset, which justified its use. According to Hair et al., (2017), variance-based SEM methods are suitable for analyzing data that deviate from normal distribution assumptions. In this research, since we found a multivariate non-normality of data, the projected model was evaluated by applying the analysis method of PLS-SEM. In PLS, the analysis occurs in two stages: assessment of the measurement model in which the reliability and validity of the variables are evaluated, and evaluation of the proposed structural model in which the links of the constructs are tested (Hair et al., 2017). It is often employed in management and marketing research because of its suitability for estimating sophisticated statistical models that emphasize causal explanations or estimations when numerous variables are present (Hair et al., 2017). Previous literature (Zafar et al., 2020) that focuses on impulsive buying has incorporated the PLS-SEM technique. In addition, PLS-SEM precisely manages the normality issues in data, as social science studies usually have normality issues (Ali et al., 2018).
Findings
Demographic details
Table 2 reports the demographics of 1422 survey respondents, of which 51.1% were male and 48.9% were female. Most participants were under 35 years of age. Most were full-time employed (52%), followed by part-time (18.5%), self-employed (18.4%), students (9.4%), unemployed (0.4%), and retired (1.1%). Of the respondents, 30.5% watched advertisements frequently, while 19.9% watched very frequently. 3.5% never searched for products online, 28.6% generally searched for products online, and 26.9% searched more frequently, while 18.7% searched very frequently. Most respondents were married (62%). In regard to earnings, 47% earned less than RMB 1500, while 35.5% earned between RMB 3001 and RMB 4500. Of the respondents, 74% had a college or bachelor’s degree, and 8.1% had a postgraduate degree; 19.5% were from East China, while the least was from other parts of China; and 32.8% purchased online frequently, while 1.8% never purchased online.
Validity and reliability
The validity and reliability of the proposed model were determined through several tests, including Cronbach’s alpha and composite reliability for reliability, and average variance extracted (AVE) for convergent validity. Discriminant validity was measured using the Loading (Fig. 3), cross-loading, Fornell-Larcker criterion and Heterotrait-monotrait ratio (HTMT) assessments. The results specified that the reliability of all the constructs is at a high level, with Cronbach’s alpha values exceeding the minimum cut-off of 0.70 and composite reliability values surpassing the suggested threshold of 0.70 (Hair et al., 2017). Convergent validity was recognized as the variances extracted were greater than 0.50 (Table 3). Discriminant validity was demonstrated through the outcomes of the Fornell-Larcker Criterion (Supporting Material S2. Loading, cross-loading and Fornell-Larcker criterion) and HTMT tests, which showed that the square roots of the AVE correlation coefficients were significantly greater than the coefficients in each row and column and that the AVE square roots were greater than the inter-construct correlations (Henseler et al., 2015). Finally, the HTMT test was conducted, and Kline (2011) recommended that the value of HTMT should be less than 0.85. As shown in Fig. 2, the test results of HTMT provided evidence that discriminant validity was secured as the obtained values were below the threshold of 0.85. The assessment of the VIF further verified that there was no inter-connection between the independent variables, as the obtained values vary from 1.49 to 1.412. Therefore, multicollinearity was ruled out. It is possible that variables possess lateral collinearity issues, even after confirming discriminant validity, which can mislead the results (Kock and Lynn, 2012).
Structural model
The connections between exogenous and endogenous factors were evaluated using structural modeling. The study used path coefficients and R2 scores (coefficients of determination) in the modeling (presented in Fig. 3 and Table 4). Cohen (2013) proposed, based on various studies, that an R2 value of 0.26 for endogenous constructs is considered substantial, a value of 0.13 is treated as moderate, and a value of 0.02 is treated as weak. Based on that, the findings of the model’s explanatory power show that the factors of advertising values have a substantial effect on UI (R2 = 28.9%), whereas the effects of UI on OIB (R2 = 18.6) are relatively moderate. The study found that IF (β = 0.144, t = 4.838, p < 0.01), CD (β = 0.155, t = 5.198, p < 0.01), CT (β = 0.170, t = 5.245, p < 0.01), ET (β = 0.104, t = 3.312, p < 0.01), and NT (β = 0.172, t = 4.959, p < 0.01), significantly and positively affect UI, except for IN (β = 0.046, t = 1.424, p > 0.05). UI is also positively linked with OIB (β = 0.401, t = 14.315, p < 0.01), but the moderating effect (see Fig. 4) of CA (β = 0.025, t = 0.775, p > 0.05) in the OIB-UI relationship is insignificant. Based on a significance level of 5%, hypotheses H1-4, and H6-7 are accepted, and H5 and H8 are rejected.
The effect size (f2) with a score greater than or equals to represents 0.35 is a large effect size, 0.15 represents a medium, and anything less than 0.02 represents a small (Cohen, 2013). The results (Table 4) show that the effect sizes for IF (0.023), CD (0.026), CT (0.031), and NT (0.029), on UI are moderate, and that of ET (0.011) and IN (0.002) are small. The effect size of UI (0.182) on OIB is substantial.
Mediating effects
The mediation result (Table 5) suggests that UI significantly mediates between IF-OIB (β = 0.058, t = 4.437, p < 0.01), CD-OIB (β = 0.058, t = 4.437, p < 0.01), CT-OIB (β = 0.058, t = 4.437, p < 0.01), ET-OIB (β = 0.058, t = 4.437, p < 0.01), and NT-OIB (β = 0.058, t = 4.437, p < 0.01), except for IN-OIB (β = 0.058, t = 4.437, p > 0.05). Based on the 5% level of significance, Hypothesis H9-12, and H14 are accepted, but H13 is rejected.
Discussion
This study aimed to assess the relationships between advertising values, such as informativeness, credibility, creativity, entertainment, and integration, directly on UI and indirectly on OIB through UI constructs. Of the 14 hypotheses estimated, 12 were established using this empirical investigation. The explanatory power (R2 = 28.9%) of this model to predict UI by the advertising value factors was substantial, and OIB (R2 = 18.6) was moderate. This indicates that the model is a good fit. The detailed discussion is as follows.
This study found that IF significantly influences UI (H1). Hence, it is confirmed that receiving information about products or services in a simple manner leads to the urge to make a purchase without having any prior plans. These findings corroborate previous study (Waymer et al., 2022) and confirm that IF is statistically significant in influencing an urge to buy positively. Thus, Chinese clients are influenced to indulge in more impulse buying if the information provided through advertising is accurate, informative, good, and timely. This finding aligns with the idea that when consumers are presented with informative content about a product, such as its features, benefits, or reviews, they may develop a desire for immediate acquisition. Informative messages or product descriptions can create a sense of urgency or excitement, triggering impulsive buying tendencies. Similarly, as the results point out, credibility has a statistically significant and positive impact on UI (H2). Thus, the results signify that the credibility, price, and recognition of reliable online product resources will make the Chinese consumers desire to buy without any plans. The results of this study support the latest findings of Li and Suh (2015), and Zhu et al., (2020). They reveal that the source of credibility is an essential factor that can lead to UI. Therefore, as credibility increases, individuals experience a stronger urge to engage in impulsive buying behavior online. When consumers perceive a brand or product as credible, trustworthy, and reliable, it creates a sense of confidence and reduces the perceived risk associated with impulsive purchases.
As expected, the findings confirm that creativity in advertising plays a significant role in influencing the Chinese online consumers to make impulse purchases (H3). Hence, this study established a connection between creativity and the urge to make impulse purchases. The results conform to the past recent research (Moes et al., 2022a, 2022b; Schwarz, 2022; Munawaroh et al., 2022), which found similar results. Thus, the Chinese consumers are more likely to form UI if the advertising is attractive, usual, and unexpected. This suggests that as creativity increases, individuals experience a stronger urge to engage in impulsive buying behavior online. Creative advertisements or product presentations capture consumers’ attention, spark their interest, and evoke emotional responses, which ultimately can stimulate the desire to make impulsive purchases. Likewise, in the context of entertainment, this study established a connection between entertainment and UI based on the outcomes (H4). Thus, advertising must be entertaining to allure the consumers to the purchase button. These findings support those of the studies carried out by Lu et al., (2022), and Zhang et al., (2023), who also established positive and significant connections between entertainment and UI. Thus, it is tested that the Chinese consumers are influenced by entertainment advertising if it is pleasant, enjoyable, entertaining, and interesting, and this encourages them to UI. Entertainment-driven advertisements or product content that provides enjoyment, excitement, or amusement can capture consumers’ attention and stimulate their desire to make impulsive purchases.
Hypothesis H5 postulated that the IN and UI are connected. The test results and analysis of interactivity showed that the abovementioned connection is statistically insignificant to form an urge to make impulsive purchases. The outcomes of this study are not consistent with those of previous studies (Li et al., 2014; Chen and Yao, 2018) which demonstrated contrasting findings. Thus, this study confirms that, in the context of China, showing interactivity to an individual does not play a key role in creating UI. Conversely, Hypothesis (H6) predicted that NT has a significant influence on UI. This outcome was proven in the empirical test. The study’s outcome satisfied that of the prior study by Wei et al. (2021). This indicates that higher levels of integration are associated with a stronger tendency to experience impulsive urges to make unplanned purchases online. This finding implies that individuals who possess better integration skills, which involve the ability to process and synthesize information from various sources, are more likely to be influenced by online stimuli and have a higher propensity for impulsive buying.
As hypothesized, in terms of UI and OIB (H7), the results establish a significant and positive relationship. Thus, this study confirmed that UI is significantly important to OIB. These results conform to the previous studies (Osswald et al., 2012; Bousbahi and Alrazgan, 2015), which reported similar findings and pointed out that the UI occurs prior to the actual impulse purchase, which indicates that there is a strong and positive correlation. Thus, the study confirmed that, while browsing the Internet, the Chinese consumers form an urge to buy, and they eventually make a purchase without any prior planning. Simultaneously, the analysis of the current findings revealed that customer anxiety has no moderating role in the link between UI and OIB (H8). The current study offers findings that are different from Gehl (2007), who found that online shoppers suffer from anxiety when shopping online, and a higher level of anxiety may prevent online shoppers from shopping and making online transactions (Yuan et al., 2022), or low anxiety may encourage customers to shop online (Annoni et al., 2021). Nonetheless, the outcomes of this study conclude that there is no moderating effect between UI and OIB and that customer anxiety plays no role as a moderator. This means that when the Chinese consumers feel the impulse to purchase a good or service, they act on that instinct without a second thought about their choices or worrying about others’ reactions.
The results suggest that customer anxiety does not significantly moderate the relationship between the urge to buy impulsively and online impulse buying behavior (H8). In other words, the influence of the urge to buy impulsively on online impulse buying behavior is not significantly different for individuals with varying levels of customer anxiety.
Hypothesis (H9-14) predicted that UI would positively mediate the relationship between IF, CD, CT, ET, IN, NT, and OIB. The results confirm the mediation of UI with CD, CT, ET, NT, and OIB, but not with NT.
The significant positive indirect effects observed in H9, H10, H11, and H14 suggest that factors such as informativeness, credibility, creativity, and integration play crucial roles in influencing consumers’ urge to buy impulsively, which ultimately leads to increased online impulse buying behavior. These findings highlight the importance of delivering informative and credible content, incorporating creative elements, and facilitating the integration of information to stimulate impulsive buying tendencies in online consumers. Furthermore, the significant positive indirect effect observed in H12 indicates that entertainment also has a notable impact on the urge to buy impulsively and subsequently influences online impulse buying behavior. This underscores the significance of incorporating entertaining elements in marketing strategies to capture consumers’ attention and motivate them to make impulsive purchases online. However, H13 reveals that interaction does not have a significant indirect effect on the urge to buy impulsively and online impulse buying behavior. This suggests that the level of interaction may not be a significant driver of impulsive buying tendencies in the online context examined in this study. However, this study signifies that when an advertisement is perceived as informative, credible, creative, entertaining, and socially engaging, it leads to impulsive buying behavior by increasing the individual’s UI. The presence of an advertising interaction capability may not help consumers buy impulsively through the UI.
Implications
Theoretical implications
The present study makes numerous significant theoretical contributions to academia in terms of adding value to the existing literature. Firstly, although there has been some recent work pertaining to impulsive buying in the Chinese context, surprisingly, most studies, such as Luo et al., (2021) and Chen et al., (2022), were confined to one specific segment and location. Thus, a broader understanding of the Chinese consumers’ impulsive buying from different parts was lacking. Thus, the current study addresses this gap and contributes by studying a large audience that includes respondents above the age of 18 years, regardless of their type of occupation and geographic location, and provides deeper insight into people’s mind about impulsive buying. Secondly, our research makes a significant theoretical contribution by comprehensively examining and analyzing the effects of multiple online advertising factors on impulsive buying behavior. By considering factors such as informativeness, credibility, creativity, entertainment, interaction, and integration, we provide a holistic view of the complex dynamics that influence consumer behavior in the online advertising context.
Thirdly, previous studies have examined the moderating effects of other variables such as self-esteem (Luo et al., 2021) and celebrity endorsement (Liu et al., 2023a), but very limited studies have tested whether customer anxiety has a role as a moderator between UI and OIB. This gap has been filled by the findings of this study, which added the “lack of information” to the extant literature and suggested that customer anxiety shows no moderate correlation with UI and OIB in China. While the moderation effect was found to be non-significant, this exploration adds to the literature by considering potential moderating factors that may influence impulsive buying behavior. Finally, it also offered a mediation role for UI within advertising values and OIB. These new relationships will enrich the impulsive buying literature enormously by expediting impulsive buying online. By demonstrating the significant indirect effects of factors such as informativeness, credibility, creativity, entertainment, and integration on the urge to buy impulsively, our research validates the role of cognitive processing and psychological factors in impulsive buying behavior. This finding contributes to the theoretical understanding of impulsive behavior in the online advertising context.
Practical implications
Given the current rapid growth of online shopping in China, this study is of great significance to the Chinese professionals employed in the online retail, marketing, and advertising industries. The authors developed a more comprehensive understanding of a larger group of Chinese customers, which essentially covers everyone over the age of 18 years, residing throughout China. This comprehensive technique and its broad range of segments have not been sufficiently investigated in earlier studies. The findings provide a deeper understanding of a wide range of segments concerning impulsive buying among stakeholders. The results show that informativeness and UI are positively related to the Chinese customers, which requires marketers, online retailers, and advertisers to make their online portals more informative regarding detailed product descriptions, customer reviews, product demonstrations, or informative advertising campaigns that highlight the unique features and benefits of the offerings so that the customers can grasp them and feel motivated to buy online with full confidence.
The results support the hypothesis that credibility has a positive influence on the urge to buy impulsively in the online context. Understanding the role of credibility in shaping impulsive buying tendencies can guide marketers in building trust and credibility in their brand, ultimately influencing consumers’ impulsive purchasing behavior. These findings have important implications for marketers and online retailers. By focusing on building credibility and trustworthiness, businesses can enhance consumers’ impulsive buying tendencies. Strategies such as showcasing positive testimonials, providing transparent information about the brand or product, and leveraging endorsements from reputable influencers or organizations can help establish credibility and positively influence consumers’ urge to make impulsive purchases.
In addition, creativity and entertainment established a statistically significant link with UI. Creative offers and displays of goods and services encourage the Chinese customers to buy impulsively. These findings have implications for marketers aiming to leverage creativity to influence impulsive buying behavior online. By incorporating innovative and captivating elements into their advertisements and product presentations, businesses can enhance consumers’ urge to make impulsive purchases. However, it is important to strike a balance between creativity and informativeness to ensure that the message is effectively conveyed while maintaining consumers’ interest and engagement. Additionally, marketers should consider the alignment between creativity and their target audience’s preferences and values. Tailoring creative strategies to resonate with consumers’ tastes and aspirations can further enhance the impact on impulsive buying tendencies. As such, entertainment is one of the keys to and it is very significant to the Chinese customers; therefore, marketers and advertisers must build their tactics based on that information. Even if customers have no desire to buy anything, they will make a purchase if they are engaged in looking for things. Ensuring advertising entertainment effectively influences the urge to buy impulsively requires a deep understanding of the target audience, creativity in content creation, and continuous optimization based on consumer feedback and data analysis. By employing these strategies, marketers can harness the power of entertainment to drive impulsive buying behavior and achieve their marketing objectives.
Equivalently, integration and UI are statistically significant for the Chinese consumers. Thus, these factors strengthen communication. For example, advertisers and marketers can gain insight that the Chinese customers are more likely to impulse buy if the advertising aligns with their opinions, and thus, use the content in advertising that aligns with the customers’ opinions, feelings, and desires. Marketers and advertisers should focus on enhancing integration skills among consumers to influence impulsive buying behavior. Strategies to achieve this include providing clear and comprehensive information about products or services, such as detailed descriptions and user reviews, to facilitate cognitive processing and integration. Personalized marketing techniques, such as tailored advertisements and recommendations, can align with individual preferences and enhance information integration. Creating a seamless and cohesive customer experience across different touchpoints ensures consistency and facilitates the integration process. Marketers can also leverage innovative technologies like augmented reality and gamification to provide interactive experiences that enhance information integration and decision-making. By implementing these strategies, marketers can drive impulsive buying behavior and improve overall customer engagement.
Finally, this study confirmed that the influence of purchasing on impulse may not be direct if consumers do not have a UI. Thus, efforts through advertising should first aim to create a UI that would more likely lead the Chinese consumers to make an impulsive purchase. Marketers should continue to engage with customers after the purchase, providing relevant recommendations, cross-selling opportunities, and incentives for repeat purchases. By nurturing the relationship and fostering ongoing engagement, marketers can sustain the urge to buy impulsively and encourage continued online impulse buying behavior.
Although the customer anxiety does not have significant moderating relation ship between UI and OIB. These findings have implications for marketers and advertisers in understanding the role of customer anxiety in the context of online impulse buying behavior. While customer anxiety may independently influence online impulse buying behavior, it does not appear to interact with the urge to buy impulsively in a significant way. Marketers should consider other factors and strategies to address and mitigate customer anxiety to encourage online impulse buying behavior. This could include providing secure payment options, transparent return policies, customer support, and building trust and credibility through reviews and testimonials. By alleviating customer anxiety, marketers can create an environment that fosters impulsive buying behavior and enhances the overall online shopping experience.
Conclusion and limitations
This study examines the connections between advertising values (informativeness, credibility, creativity, entertainment, interaction, and integration) and online OIB, both directly and indirectly, through the UI construct. This study also determined the moderating role of consumer anxiety on the connection between UI and OIB. The study verified that advertising should be informative, credible, creative, entertaining, and integrative, and that UI is an important factor in purchasing online without any prior planning. Surprisingly, interactivity was not a significant parameter, as was found in the current study. Finally, customer anxiety did not play a moderating role in establishing any connection between UI and OIB. This study also sheds light on the mediating effect and reveals that UI mediates the IF-OIB, CD-OIB, CT-OIB, ET-OIB, and NT-OIB relationships. Unfortunately, the IN-OIB relationship was not found to be mediated through UI.
This study was limited to some contexts. First, while the study examined several important online advertising factors, there may be other variables that were not considered. Factors such as social influence, personal values, or situational factors could influence impulsive buying behavior but were not included in the analysis. Future research could explore these additional variables to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the phenomenon. Second, our study did not find a moderate relationship with CA. To achieve a better conceptualization of the mechanisms underlying UI and OIB, future studies can explore new interaction factors, such as marketing promotions and consumer involvement, product category, individual differences, which future studies could undertake in the research framework.
Third, this study used a cross-sectional design, which limits the ability to establish causal relationships. The study captures data at a single point in time, making it difficult to determine the temporal sequence and directionality of the relationships between online advertising factors, urge to buy impulsively, and online impulse buying behavior. Longitudinal or experimental designs could provide stronger evidence of causality. Fourth, the sample used in this study was limited to a specific population or region (China), which may restrict the generalizability of the findings as e-commerce has not been established. The participants’ demographic characteristics and online shopping behaviors may not fully represent the broader population. Future research could aim for more diverse and representative samples to enhance the external validity of the results.
Fifth, the study focused on the context of online impulsive buying behavior, which may limit the generalizability of the findings to offline retail or other product categories. Replicating the study in different contexts would allow for a more comprehensive understanding of the factors influencing impulsive buying behavior across various settings. Finally, this study is the reliance on self-reported data, which introduces the possibility of response biases and inaccuracies. Participants’ responses may be influenced by social desirability or may not accurately reflect their actual behaviors. Future research could incorporate objective measures or observational data to enhance the reliability and validity of the findings.
Data availability
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/(Supporting Materials S3. Dataset), further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.
References
Abdelsalam S, Salim N, Alias RA, Husain O (2020) Understanding Online Impulse Buying Behavior in Social Commerce: A Systematic Literature Review. IEEE Access 8:89041–89058. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2993671
Akram U, Hui P, Khan MK, Yan C, Akram Z (2018) Factors affecting online impulse buying: evidence from the Chinese social commerce environment. Sustainability 10(2):352. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020352
Akram U, Hui P, Kaleem Khan M, Tanveer Y, Mehmood K, Ahmad W (2018) How website quality affects online impulse buying: Moderating effects of sales promotion and credit card use. Asia Pacific J Mark Logist 30(1):235–256. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-04-2017-0073
Ali F, Rasoolimanesh SM, Sarstedt M, Ringle CM, Ryu K (2018) An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) in hospitality research. Int J Contemp Hosp Manag 30(1):514–538. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-10-2016-0568
Annoni AM, Petrocchi S, Camerini A-L, Marciano L (2021) The relationship between social anxiety, smartphone use, dispositional trust, and problematic smartphone use: a moderated mediation model. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18(5):2452. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18052452
Aragoncillo L, Orus C (2018) Impulse buying behaviour: An online-offline comparative and the impact of Social Media. Span J Mark 22(1):42–62. https://doi.org/10.1108/sjme-03-2018-007
Beatty SE, Ferrell ME (1998) Impulse buying: modeling its precursors. J Retail 74(2):169–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(99)80092-X
Bellini S, Cardinali MG, Grandi B (2017) A structural equation model of impulse buying behaviour in grocery retailing. J Retail Consum Serv 36:164–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.02.001
Bousbahi F, Alrazgan MS (2015) Investigating IT faculty resistance to learning management system adoption using latent variables in an acceptance technology model. Sci World J. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/375651
Brackett LK, Carr BN (2001) Cyberspace advertising vs. other media: consumer vs. mature student attitudes. J Advert Res 41(5):23–32. https://doi.org/10.2501/jar-41-5-23-32
Bucklin RE, Lattin JM (1991) A two-state model of purchase incidence and brand choice. Mark Sci 10(1):24–39. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.10.1.24
Cain MK, Zhang Z, Yuan KH (2017) Univariate and multivariate skewness and kurtosis for measuring nonnormality: Prevalence, influence and estimation. Behav Res 49:1716–1735. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0814-1
Cakanlar A, Nguyen T (2018) The influence of culture on impulse buying. J Consum Mark 36(1):12–23. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-03-2017-2139
Çakanlar A, Nguyen T (2019) The influence of culture on impulse buying. J Consum Mark 36(1):12–23. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-03-2017-2139
Çelik H (2011) Influence of social norms, perceived playfulness and online shopping anxiety on customers’ adoption of online retail shopping: an empirical study in the Turkish context. Int J Retail Distrib Manag 39(6):390–413. https://doi.org/10.1108/09590551111137967
Charm T, Coggins B, Robinson K, Wilkie J (2020) The great consumer shift: Ten charts that show how US shopping behavior is changing. McKinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/growth-marketing-and-sales/our-insights/the-great-consumer-shift-ten-charts-that-show-how-us-shopping-behavior-is-changing#/
Chen C-C, Yao J-Y (2018) What drives impulse buying behaviors in a mobile auction? the perspective of the stimulus-organism-response model. Telemat Inform 35(5):1249–1262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.02.007
Chen H, Chen H, Tian X (2022) The dual-process model of product information and habit in influencing consumers’ purchase intention: The role of live streaming features. Electron Commer Res Appl 53:101150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2022.101150
Chen H, Zhang S, Shao B, Gao W, Xu Y (2021) How do interpersonal interaction factors affect buyers’ purchase intention in live stream shopping? The mediating effects of swift guanxi. Internet Res 31(2):463–478. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-05-2020-0252
Chen X, Huang Q, Davison RM (2017) The role of website quality and social capital in building buyers’ loyalty. Int J Inform Manag 37:1563–1574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.07.005
Chen Y, Zhang L (2015) Influential factors for online impulse buying in China: a model and its empirical analysis. Int Manag Rev 11(2):57–69. http://americanscholarspress.us/journals/IMR/pdf/IMR-2-2015/IMR-v11n2art5.pdf
China Internet Network Information Center (2023) The 51st Statistical Report on China’s Internet Development. China Internet Network Information Center(CNNIC). https://www.cnnic.net.cn/n4/2023/0303/c88-10757.html. Accessed 9 Jun 2023
Cohen J (2013) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587
Compeau D, Higgins CA, Huff S (1999) Social cognitive theory and individual reactions to computing technology: a longitudinal study. MIS Quarterly 23(2):145–158. https://doi.org/10.2307/249749
Cvirka D, Rudienė E, Morkūnas M (2022) Investigation of attributes influencing the attractiveness of mobile commerce advertisements on the Facebook platform. Economics 10(2):52. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies10020052
Czarnecka B, Schivinski B (2019) Do Consumers Acculturated to Global Consumer Culture Buy More Impulsively? The Moderating Role of Attitudes towards and Beliefs about Advertising. J Glob Mark 32(4):219–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/08911762.2019.1600094
Ding X, Zhang X, Wang G (2017) Do you get tired of shopping online? Exploring the influence of information overload on subjective states towards purchase decision. In Proceedings of the sixteenth workshop on human interaction with computers and e-Business (WHICEB), 26th May, 2017, 7 (560–569). http://aisel.aisnet.org/whiceb2017
Ding Y, Lu H (2017) The interactions between online shopping and personal activity travel behavior: an analysis with a GPS-based activity travel diary. Transportation 44:311–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-015-9639-5
Donovan RJ, Rossiter JR, Marcoolyn G, Nesdale A (1994) Store atmosphere and purchasing behavior. J Retail 70(3):283–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4359(94)90037-X
Ducoffe RH (1995) How consumers assess the value of advertising. J Curr Issues Res Advert 17(1):1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10641734.1995.10505022
Ducoffe RH, Curlo E (2000) Advertising value and advertising processing. J Mark Commun 6(4):247–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/135272600750036364
Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A-G, Buchner A (2007) G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 39(2):175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
Foroughi A, Buang NA, Senik ZC, Hajmisadeghi RS (2013) Impulse buying behavior and moderating role of gender among Iranian shoppers. J Basic Appl Sci Res 3(4):760–769. https://journals.sfu.ca/je/index.php/euromarketing/article/download/45/11/179
Gehl D (2007) How to reduce ‘Purchase Anxiety’. http://www.entrepreneur.com/article/187592. Accessed May 2014
Gehl RW (2021) Dark web advertising: the dark magic system on Tor hidden service search engines. Continuum 35(5):667–678. https://doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2021.1983251
Gligor D, Bozkurt S (2021) The role of perceived social media agility in customer engagement. J Res Interact Mark 15(1):125–146. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIM-12-2019-0196
Goel P, Kaushik N, Sivathanu B, Pillai R, Vikas J (2022a) Consumers’ adoption of artificial intelligence and robotics in hospitality and tourism sector: literature review and future research agenda. Tour Rev 77(4):1081–1096. https://doi.org/10.1108/tr-03-2021-0138
Goel P, Parayitam S, Sharma A, Rana NP, Dwivedi YK (2022b) A moderated mediation model for e-impulse buying tendency, customer satisfaction and intention to continue e-shopping. J Bus Res 142:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.12.041
Gulfraz MB, Sufyan M, Mustak M, Salminen J, Srivastava DK (2022) Understanding the impact of online customers’ shopping experience on online impulsive buying: a study on two leading e-commerce platforms. J Retail Consum Serv 68:103000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.103000
Ha YW, Kim J, Libaque-Saenz CF, Chang Y, Park MC (2015) Use and gratifications of mobile SNSs: Facebook and KakaoTalk in Korea. Telemat Inform 32(3):425–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2014.10.006
Hackbarth G, Grover V, Mun YY (2003) Computer playfulness and anxiety: positive and negative mediators of the system experience effect on perceived ease of use. Inf Manag 40(3):221–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(02)00006-X
Hair J, Hollingsworth CL, Randolph AB, Chong AYL (2017) An updated and expanded assessment of PLS-SEM in information systems research. Ind Manag Data Syst 117(3):442–458. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-04-2016-0130
Han MC (2023) Checkout button and online consumer impulse-buying behavior in social commerce: a trust transfer perspective. J Retail Consum Serv 74:103431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103431
Henseler J, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M (2015) A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. J Acad Mark Sci 43(1):115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
Herzallah D, Munoz Leiva F, Liebana-Cabanillas F (2022) To buy or not to buy, that is the question: understanding the determinants of the urge to buy impulsively on Instagram Commerce. J Res Interact Mark 16(4):477–493. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIM-05-2021-0145
Hidayat Z (2022) Gadgets Are Always in the Hands of Consumers: The Triggers for Impulsive Buying Behavior. In A New Era of Consumer Behavior-Beyond the Pandemic. Intech Open. https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/83331
Hoffman DL, Novak TP (1996) Marketing in Hypermedia Computer-Mediated Environments: Conceptual Foundations. J Mark 60(3):50–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299606000304
Huang LT (2016) Flow and social capital theory in online impulse buying. J Bus Res 69(6):2277–2283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.12.042
Iyer R, Babin BJ, Eastman JK, Griffin M (2022) Drivers of attitudes toward luxury and counterfeit products: the moderating role of interpersonal influence. Int Mark Rev 39(2):242–268. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-02-2021-0091
Joiner R, Gavin J, Brosnan M, Cromby J, Gregory H, Guiller J, Moon A (2013) Comparing first and second generation digital natives’ Internet use, Internet anxiety, and Internet identification. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw16(7):549–552. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0526
Kacen JJ, Lee JA (2002) The influence of culture on consumer impulsive buying behavior. J Consum Psychol 12(2):163–176. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327663JCP1202_08
Karim MW, Chowdhury MAM, Al Masud M, Arifuzzaman M (2021) Analysis of factors influencing impulse buying behavior towards e-tailing sites: an application of SOR model. Contemp Manag Res 17(2):97–126
Kaur R, Brar AS, Goel P (2022) Factors affecting impulse buying behavior of working women of Punjab towards formal wear. J Manag Entrepreneurship 16(1):1–11
Kazempour Y, Lotfizadeh F (2017) The impact of situational factors (store, personal) on urge to buy impulsively and impulse buying behavior. Eur J Bus Innov Res 5(4):12–27. https://www.eajournals.org/wp-content/uploads/The-Impact-of-Situational-Factors-Store-Personal-On-Urge-to-Buy-Impulsively-and-Impulsive-Buying-Behavior.pdf
Khoa BT, Huynh TT (2022) How do customer anxiety levels impact relationship marketing in electronic commerce? Cogent Bus Manag 9(1):2136928. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2136928
Kline RB (2011) Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford Press, New York
Kock N (2015) Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. Int J e-Collab 11(4):1–10
Kock N, Lynn GS (2012) Lateral collinearity and misleading results in variance-based SEM: An illustration and recommendations. J Assoc Inf Syst 13(7):546–580
Labrecque LI (2014) Fostering Consumer–Brand Relationships in Social Media Environments: The Role of Parasocial Interaction. J Interact Mark 28(2):134–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2013.12.003
Lafferty BA, Goldsmith RE (1999) Corporate credibility’s role in consumers’ attitudes and purchase intentions when a high versus a low credibility endorser is used in the ad. J Bus Res 44(2):109–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(98)00002-2
Lavuri R (2023) Intrinsic factors affecting online impulsive shopping during the COVID-19 in emerging markets. Int J Emerg Mark 18(4):958–977. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-12-2020-1530
Lee C-H, Chen C-W (2021) Impulse Buying Behaviors in Live Streaming Commerce Based on the Stimulus-Organism-Response Framework. Inf 12(6):241. https://doi.org/10.3390/info12060241
Lee J, Hong IB (2016) Predicting positive user responses to social media advertising: the roles of emotional appeal, informativeness, and creativity. Int J Inf Manag 36(3):360–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.01.001
Leong TK, Meng TP, Alex TYJ (2022) Impulse buying in live stream based on the stimulus-organism-response framework. Jurnal Pengurusan 66:1–14. https://doi.org/10.17576/pengurusan-2022-66-06
Li H, Jiang J, Wu M (2014) The effects of trust assurances on consumers’ initial online trust: A two-stage decision-making process perspective. Int J Inf Manage 34(3):395–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.02.004
Li R, Suh A (2015) Factors influencing information credibility on social media platforms: evidence from Facebook pages. Procedia Comput Sci 72:314–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.12.146
Lim X-J, Cheah J-H, Cham TH, Ting H, Memon MA (2020) Compulsive buying of branded apparel, its antecedents, and the mediating role of brand attachment. Asia Pacific J Mark Logist 32(7):1539–1563. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-03-2019-0126
Lin X, Featherman M, Brooks SL, Hajli N (2018) Exploring gender differences in online consumer purchase decision making: An online product presentation perspective. Inf Syst Front 21(5):1187–1201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-018-9831-1
Lina Y, Hou D, Ali S (2022) Impact of online convenience on generation Z online impulsive buying behavior: The moderating role of social media celebrity. Front Psychol 13:951249. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.951249
Liu B, Moyle B, Kralj A, Li Y (2023a) Celebrity endorsement in tourism: Attention, emotional arousal and familiarity. Tour Manag 98:104750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2023.104750
Liu C-L‘E, Sinkovics RR, Pezderka N, Haghirian P (2012) Determinants of consumer perceptions toward mobile advertising—a comparison between Japan and Austria. J Interact Mark 26(1):21–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2011.07.002
Liu Y, Cai L, Ma F, Wang X (2023b) Revenge buying after the lockdown: Based on the SOR framework and TPB Model. J Retail Consum Serv 72:103263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103263
Lu W, Chen Y, Li S (2022) Mechanism of Interaction and Entertainment Impact on Impulse Purchase Intention in Shopping Livestream. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on E-Commerce, E-Business and E-Government (pp. 59-63), University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK, 27–29 April 2022. https://doi.org/10.1145/3537693.3537763
Luo H, Chen J, Li S, Nie Y, Wang G (2021) Social exclusion and impulsive buying among Chinese college students: the mediating role of self-esteem and the moderating role of risk preference. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18(21):11027. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111027
MacKenzie SB, Lutz RJ (1989) An Empirical Examination of the Structural Antecedents of Attitude toward the Ad in an Advertising Pretesting Context. J Mark 53(2):48–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298905300204
Malafe NSA, Gholipour Fereydoni S, Nabavi Chashmi SA (2023) The impact of advertising values on impulsive and compulsive buying. J Internet Commer 22(3):1–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332861.2022.2057122
Martins J, Costa C, Oliveira T, Gonçalves R, Branco F (2019) How smartphone advertising influences consumers’ purchase intention. J Bus Res 94:378–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.12.047
McKinsey & Company. (2020) China consumer report 2021 Understanding Chinese Consumers: Growth Engine of the World. McKinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/featured%20insights/china/china%20still%20the%20worlds%20growth%20engine%20after%20covid%2019/mckinsey%20china%20consumer%20report%202021.pdf. Accessed 18 Jun 2023
Mead JA, Richerson R, Li W (2020) Dynamic right-slanted fonts increase the effectiveness of promotional retail advertising. J Retail 96(2):282–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2019.10.002
Mehrabian A, Russell J A (1974) An approach to environmental psychology. The MIT Press
Mert M, Tengilimoglu D, Dursun-Kilic T (2021) The impact of consumer perceptions of social media advertisements on buyer behavior: an intercultural investigation. J Euromark 30:95–118
Ming J, Jianqiu Z, Bilal M, Akram U, Fan M (2021) How social presence influences impulse buying behavior in live streaming commerce? The role of SOR theory. Int J Web Inf Syst 17(4):300–320. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJWIS-02-2021-0012
Miranda NG, Balqiah TE (2020) Role of network externalities and innovation characteristics in influencing intentions to use an online bank: moderating technological anxiety. Int J Bus Soc 21(3):1352–1365. https://doi.org/10.33736/ijbs.3354.2020
Moes A, Fransen M, Verhagen T, Fennis B (2022b) A good reason to buy: justification drives the effect of advertising frames on impulsive socially responsible buying. Psychol Mark 39(12):2260–2272. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21733
Moes A, Fransen M, Fennis B, Verhagen T, van Vliet H (2022a) In-store interactive advertising screens: the effect of interactivity on impulse buying explained by self-agency. J Res Interact Mark 16(3):457–474. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIM-03-2021-0097
Mouakket S, Al-Hawari MA (2012) Investigating the factors affecting university students’ e-loyalty intention towards the Blackboard System. Int J Bus Inf Syst 9(3):239. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijbis.2012.045717
Moutinho M, Rodrigues M, Ribeiro A (2022) Determinants and consequences of YouTube advertising value. Int J Mark Commun New Media, 10(18). https://doi.org/10.54663/2182-9306.2022.v10.n18.50-70
Munawaroh, Setyani NS, Susilowati L, Rukminingsih (2022) The effect of e- problem based learning on students’ interest, motivation and achievement. Int J Instr 15(3):503–518. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15328a
Mursid A (2021) Effects of sentiment on impulsive buying behavior: evidence of COVID-19 in Indonesia. J Econom Bus Account Ventura 23(3):452–465. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/61c8/9ae2fa16188b2c5d44fcf1dedfd2d09ded98.pdf
Nagar K, Gandotra P (2016) Exploring choice overload, internet shopping anxiety, variety seeking and online shopping adoption relationship: Evidence from online fashion stores. Glob Bus Rev 17(4):851–869. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150916645682
Osswald S, Wurhofer D, Trösterer S, Beck E, Tscheligi M (2012) Predicting information technology usage in the car: towards a car technology acceptance model. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on automotive user interfaces and interactive vehicular applications (AutomotiveUI'12) (pp. 51-58). October 2012, ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2390256.2390264
Öztürk A, Kirmizikaya A, Akin MS (2021) The effect of emotional benefit of cute products on impulsive buying behavior. İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi 10(3):2975–2991. https://doi.org/10.15869/itobiad.931127
Parsad C (2020) Comparing between product-specific and general impulse buying tendency: Does shoppers’ personality influence their impulse buying tendency? Asian Acad Manage J 24(2):41–61. https://doi.org/10.21315/aamj2019.24.2.3
Qiu L, Chen X, Lee TJ (2021) How can the celebrity endorsement effect help consumer engagement? A case of promoting tourism products through live streaming. Sustainability 13(15):8655. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158655
Quan-Haase A, Young AL (2010) Uses and gratifications of social media: a comparison of Facebook and instant messaging. Bull Sci Technol Soc 30(5):350–361. https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467610380009
Rahayu A, Saparudin M, Hurriyati R (2020) Factors influencing online purchase intention: The mediating role of customer trust (a study among university students in Jakarta). Proceedings of the 3rd Global Conference On Business, Management, and Entrepreneurship (GCBME 2018). https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.200131.001
Rajan KA (2020) Influence of hedonic and utilitarian motivation on impulse and rational buying behavior in online shopping. J Stat Manag Syst 23(2):419–430. https://doi.org/10.1080/09720510.2020.1736326
Redine A, Deshpande S, Jebarajakirthy C, Surachartkumtonkun J (2022) Impulse buying: a systematic literature review and future research directions. Int J Consum Stud 47(1):3–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12862
Rook DW (1987) The buying impulse. J Consum Res 14(2):189–199. https://doi.org/10.1086/209105
Schwarz E (2022) Advertising Efficiency in a Nutshell. In Neuro-Advertising: Brain-friendly advertising for more success in your market. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, pp. 179–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-38633-7_8
Seong J, Ngai J, Woetzel J, Leung N (2021) Fast forward China: How COVID-19 is accelerating 5 key trends shaping the Chinese economy. Available from: https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/featured%20insights/china/china%20still%20the%20worlds%20growth%20engine%20after%20covid%2019/mckinsey%20china%20consumer%20report
Shamim K, Islam T (2022) Digital influencer marketing: how message credibility and media credibility affect trust and impulsive buying. J Glob Sch Mark Sci 32(4):601–626. https://doi.org/10.1080/21639159.2022.2052342
Sharma A, Dwivedi R, Mariani MM, Islam T (2022) Investigating the effect of advertising irritation on digital advertising effectiveness: a moderated mediation model. Technol Forecast Soc Change 180:121731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121731
She L, Sharif SP, Nia HS (2021) Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the modified online compulsive buying scale among Chinese young consumers. J Asia-Pacific Bus 22(2):121–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/10599231.2021.1905493
Shen KN, Khalifa M (2012) System design effects on online impulse buying. Internet Res 22(4):396–425. https://doi.org/10.1108/10662241211250962
Sheng M, Basha NK (2022) A conceptual framework to study effective short-video platform advertising on Chinese generation Y consumer online purchase intention. WSEAS Trans Environ Dev 8(9):1055–1072. https://doi.org/10.37394/232015.2022.18.101
Song HG (2022) Consumers’ Hedonic browsing behavior in food online shopping. Culin Sci Hosp Res 28(2):37–46. https://www.dbpia.co.kr/Journal/articleDetail?nodeId=NODE11037208
Stern H (1962) The significance of impulse buying today. J Mark 26(2):59–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224296202600212
Sundström M, Hjelm-Lidholm S, Radon A (2019) Clicking the boredom away–Exploring impulse fashion buying behavior online. J Retail Consum Serv 47:150–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.11.006
Swanson DL (1979) Political communication research and the uses and gratifications model a critique. Commun Res 6(1):37–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365027900600103
Taylor DG, Lewin JE, Strutton D (2011) Friends, fans, and followers: do ads work on social networks?: how gender and age shape receptivity. J Advert Res 51(1):258–275. https://doi.org/10.2501/JAR-51-1-258-275
Tran V- D, Nguyen NT (2022) Investigating the relationship between brand experience, Brand Authenticity, brand equity, and customer satisfaction: Evidence from Vietnam. Cogent Bus Manag, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2084968
Um T, Chung N, Stienmetz J (2022) Factors affecting consumers’ impulsive buying behavior in tourism Mobile commerce using SEM and fsQCA. J Vacat Mark, 13567667221090991. https://doi.org/10.1177/13567667221090991
Van-Tien Dao W, Nhat Hanh Le A, Ming-Sung Cheng J, Chao Chen D (2014) Social media advertising value: The case of transitional economies in Southeast Asia. Intl J Advert 33(2):271–294. https://doi.org/10.2501/IJA-33-2-271-294
Verhagen T, Van Dolen W (2011) The influence of online store beliefs on consumer online impulse buying: a model and empirical application. Inf Manag 48(8):320–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2011.08.001
Vidya M, Selvamani P (2019) Consumer behaviour towards online shopping–an analysis with product dimensions. Int J Innov Technol Explor Eng 8(12S):511–514
Vijayasarathy LR (2004) Predicting consumer intentions to use on-line shopping: the case for an augmented technology acceptance model. Inf Manag 41(6):747–762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2003.08.011
Wang SW, Kao GHY, Ngamsiriudom W (2017) Consumers’ attitude of endorser credibility, brand and intention with respect to celebrity endorsement of the airline sector. J Air Transp Manag 60:10–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2016.12.007
Waymer D, Gilliland MW, Barbour JB (2022) Examining the role of individuals’ perceptions of likelihood of sustained commitment in corporate-nonprofit partnership CSR advertisements. Int J Advert 41(2):258–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2021.1914455
Web Power (2018) Univariate and multivariate skewness and kurtosis calculation, https://webpower.psychstat.org/models/kurtosis/. Accessed 31 Jan 2023
Wei X, Ko I, Pearce A (2021) Does perceived advertising value alleviate advertising avoidance in mobile social media? Exploring its moderated mediation effects. Sustainability 14(1):253. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010253
Wiranata AT, Hananto A (2020) Do Website Quality, Fashion Consciousness, and Sales Promotion Increase Impulse Buying Behavior of E-Commerce Buyers? Indonesian J Bus Entrep 6(1):74. https://doi.org/10.17358/ijbe.6.1.74
Wu L, Chiu ML, Chen KW (2020) Defining the determinants of online impulse buying through a shopping process of integrating perceived risk, expectation-confirmation model, and flow theory issues. Int J Inf Manag 52:102099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102099
Xiang L, Zheng X, Lee MKO, Zhao D (2016) Exploring consumers’ impulse buying behavior on Social Commerce Platform: The role of parasocial interaction. Int J Inf Manag 36(3):333–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.11.002
Xiao SH, Nicholson M (2013) A multidisciplinary cognitive behavioural framework of impulse buying: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Manag Rev 15(3):333–356. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2012.00345.x
Xu H, Zhang KZ, Zhao SJ (2020) A dual systems model of online impulse buying. Ind Manag Data Syst 120(5):845–861. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-04-2019-0214
Yan M, Kwok APK, Chan AHS, Zhuang YS, Wen K, Zhang KC (2022) An empirical investigation of the impact of influencer live-streaming ads in e-commerce platforms on consumers’ buying impulse. Internet Res, (ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-11-2020-0625
Yi S, Jai T (2020) Impacts of consumers’ beliefs, desires and emotions on their impulse buying behavior: application of an integrated model of belief-desire theory of emotion. J Hosp Mark Manag 29(6):662–681. https://doi.org/10.1080/19368623.2020.1692267
Yu Y (2022) Effects of negative emotions and cognitive characteristics on impulse buying during COVID-19. Front Psychol 13:848256–848256.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.848256
Yuan C, Zhang C, Wang S (2022) Social anxiety as a moderator in consumer willingness to accept AI assistants based on utilitarian and hedonic values. J Retail Consum Serv 65:102878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102878
Zafar AU, Qiu J, Shahzad M (2020) Do digital celebrities’ relationships and social climate matter? Impulse buying in f-commerce. Internet Res 30(6):1731–1762. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-04-2019-0142
Zha X, Li J, Yan Y (2015) Advertising value and credibility transfer: attitude towards web advertising and online information acquisition. Beha Inf Technol 34(5):520–532. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2014.978380
Zhang J, Xu Y, Dong L, Long Q (2023) Gratification matters? An explorative study of antecedents and consequence in livestream shopping. Ind Manag Data Syst 123(6):1649–1669. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-08-2022-0513
Zhang P, Xie MD, Zhao DY (2019) The influence of social networks on consumers’ impulse purchase: a model and empirical analysis. J Bus Econom Res767(4):68–7
Zhang S, Wei MX (2019) The formation of online impulse buying desire: an empirical study based on social commerce. J Jinan (Philos Soc Sci Ed) 41(5):17–29
Zhang Z, Zhang N, Wang J (2022) The influencing factors on impulse buying behavior of consumers under the mode of hunger marketing in live commerce. Sustainability 14(4):2122. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042122
Zhao Y, Li Y, Wang N et al. (2022) A meta-analysis of online impulsive buying and the moderating effect of economic development level. Inf Syst Front 24:1667–1688. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-021-10170-4
Zheng Y, Yang X, Zhou R, Niu G, Liu Q, Zhou Z (2020) Upward social comparison and state anxiety as mediators between passive social network site usage and online compulsive buying among women. Addict Behav 111:106569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106569
Zhu YQ, Amelina D, Yen DC (2020) Celebrity endorsement and impulsive buying intentions in social commerce-the case of instagram in Indonesia: Celebrity Endorsement. J Electron Commer Org 18(1):1–17. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-6287-4.ch075
Funding
This study is supported via funding from Jiangsu Province ‘14th Five-Year Plan’ Business Administration Key Construction Discipline Project (Su Jiaoyanhan -2022- No. 2/Sequence 285) and Xinyingyun E-commerce Operation Service (Project No. XQPT003).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization: ZF, AAM, MM and QY. Methodology: ZF, MM and QY. Formal analysis: AAM. Writing—original draft: ZF and QY. Writing—review & editing: AAM and MM.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethical approval
The ethics committee of Nantong Institute of Technology, China approved this study (Reference number: BS-NIT2023-0411). This study has been performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
Informed consent
Written informed consent for participation was obtained from respondents who participated in the survey. No data was collected from anyone under 18 years old.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Feng, Z., Al Mamun, A., Masukujjaman, M. et al. Modeling the significance of advertising values on online impulse buying behavior. Humanit Soc Sci Commun 10, 728 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02231-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02231-7
This article is cited by
-
Sentiment-based predictive models for online purchases in the era of marketing 5.0: a systematic review
Journal of Big Data (2024)






