Abstract
Artificial intelligence has the capacity to accelerate the interpretation of medical images and support diagnostic decision-making. Delivering these benefits directly within clinical imaging systems, however, requires compact computing hardware capable of executing both generative and discriminative operations with low latency and high energy efficiency. Generative adversarial networks, which combine image synthesis with classification, offer particular promise for improving diagnostic accuracy and augmenting limited datasets, but their implementation in hardware remains challenging owing to competing requirements for rapid weight updates and long-term retention stability. Here we report a reconfigurable neuromorphic platform based on ferroelectric field-effect transistors that enables dual-mode operation via dynamic switching between ferroelectric polarization and charge-trapping mechanisms. This architecture supports both high-speed, energy-efficient synaptic programming and robust non-volatile retention within the same device. Implemented in a 6 × 6 analogue crossbar, the system performs convolution and deconvolution operations representative of generative-adversarial-network workflows, enabling realistic synthesis of mammographic lesions. This approach establishes a compact hardware foundation for embedded diagnostic intelligence in next-generation imaging instruments.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout





Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data that support the plots within this article and other findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.
Code availability
All codes are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.
References
Lee, J.-G. et al. Deep learning in medical imaging: general overview. Korean J. Radiol. 18, 570–584 (2017).
Litjens, G. et al. A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis. Med. Image Anal. 42, 60–88 (2017).
Zhu, Y. et al. MRI-based prostate cancer detection with high-level representation and hierarchical classification. Med. Phys. 44, 1028–1039 (2017).
Wang, G., Ye, J. C., Mueller, K. & Fessler, J. A. Image reconstruction is a new frontier of machine learning. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 37, 1289–1296 (2018).
Kaissis, G. A., Makowski, M. R., Rückert, D. & Braren, R. F. Secure, privacy-preserving and federated machine learning in medical imaging. Nat. Mach. Intell. 2, 305–311 (2020).
Yao, P. et al. Fully hardware-implemented memristor convolutional neural network. Nature 577, 641–646 (2020).
Li, Y. et al. Anomalous resistive switching in memristors based on two-dimensional palladium diselenide using heterophase grain boundaries. Nat. Electron. 4, 348–356 (2021).
Kim, M.-K., Kim, I.-J. & Lee, J.-S. CMOS-compatible compute-in-memory accelerators based on integrated ferroelectric synaptic arrays for convolution neural networks. Sci. Adv. 8, eabm8537 (2022).
Osuala, R. et al. Data synthesis and adversarial networks: a review and meta-analysis in cancer imaging. Med. Image Anal. 84, 102704 (2023).
Alrashedy, H. H. N., Almansour, A. F., Ibrahim, D. M. & Hammoudeh, M. A. A. BrainGAN: brain MRI image generation and classification framework using GAN architectures and CNN models. Sensors 22, 4297 (2022).
Liu, G., Lan, S., Zhang, T., Huang, W. & Wang, W. SAGAN: skip-attention GAN for anomaly detection. In 2021 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP) (eds Delp, E. J. III et al.) 2468–2472 (IEEE, 2021); https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIP42928.2021.9506332
van Tulder, G. & de Bruijne, M. Combining generative and discriminative representation learning for lung CT analysis with convolutional restricted Boltzmann machines. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 35, 1262–1272 (2016).
Kendall, J. D. & Kumar, S. The building blocks of a brain-inspired computer. Appl. Phys. Rev. 7, 011305 (2020).
Müller, J. et al. Ferroelectricity in simple binary ZrO2 and HfO2. Nano Lett. 12, 4318–4323 (2012).
Chien, Y.-C. et al. A MoS2 hafnium oxide based ferroelectric encoder for temporal-efficient spiking neural network. Adv. Mater. 35, 2204949 (2023).
Cheema, S. S. et al. Enhanced ferroelectricity in ultrathin films grown directly on silicon. Nature 580, 478–482 (2020).
Zhou, Y. et al. A reconfigurable two-WSe2-transistor synaptic cell for reinforcement learning. Adv. Mater. 34, 2107754 (2022).
Lee, H. S. et al. MoS2 nanosheets for top-gate nonvolatile memory transistor channel. Small 8, 3111–3115 (2012).
Wang, X. et al. Ultrasensitive and broadband MoS2 photodetector driven by ferroelectrics. Adv. Mater. 27, 6575–6581 (2015).
Lee, Y. T. et al. Nonvolatile ferroelectric memory circuit using black phosphorus nanosheet-based field-effect transistors with P(VDF-TrFE) polymer. ACS Nano 9, 10394–10401 (2015).
Huang, H. et al. Ferroelectric polymer tuned two dimensional layered MoTe2 photodetector. RSC Adv. 6, 87416–87421 (2016).
Wang, X. et al. Two-dimensional negative capacitance transistor with polyvinylidene fluoride-based ferroelectric polymer gating. npj 2D Mater. Appl. 1, 38 (2017).
Luo, Z.-D. et al. Dual-ferroelectric-coupling-engineered two-dimensional transistors for multifunctional in-memory computing. ACS Nano 16, 3362–3372 (2022).
Li, D. et al. The ambipolar evolution of a high-performance WSe2 transistor assisted by a ferroelectric polymer. Nanotechnology 29, 105202 (2018).
Liao, J. et al. Van der Waals ferroelectric semiconductor field effect transistor for in-memory computing. ACS Nano 17, 6095–6102 (2023).
Wang, X. et al. Van der Waals engineering of ferroelectric heterostructures for long-retention memory. Nat. Commun. 12, 1109 (2021).
Zha, J. et al. Electronic/optoelectronic memory device enabled by tellurium-based 2D van der Waals heterostructure for in-sensor reservoir computing at the optical communication band. Adv. Mater. 35, 2211598 (2023).
Jiang, X. et al. Ferroelectric field-effect transistors based on WSe2/CuInP2S6 heterostructures for memory applications. ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 3, 4711–4717 (2021).
Liu, X. et al. Post-CMOS compatible aluminum scandium nitride/2D channel ferroelectric field-effect-transistor memory. Nano Lett. 21, 3753–3761 (2021).
Kim, K.-H. et al. Tuning polarity in WSe2/AlScN FeFETs via contact engineering. ACS Nano 18, 4180–4188 (2024).
Zhang, X.-W. et al. MoS2 field-effect transistors with lead zirconate-titanate ferroelectric gating. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 36, 784–786 (2015).
Lu, Z. et al. Nonvolatile MoS2 field effect transistors directly gated by single crystalline epitaxial ferroelectric. Appl. Phys. Lett. 111, 023104 (2017).
Mbisike, S. C., Eckart, L., Phair, J. W., Lomax, P. & Cheung, R. Amplification of pyroelectric device with WSe2 field effect transistor and ferroelectric gating. J. Appl. Phys. 131, 144101 (2022).
Ko, C. et al. Ferroelectrically gated atomically thin transition-metal dichalcogenides as nonvolatile memory. Adv. Mater. 28, 2923–2930 (2016).
Chen, L. et al. A van der Waals synaptic transistor based on ferroelectric Hf0.5Zr0.5O2 and 2D tungsten disulfide. Adv. Electron. Mater. 6, 2000057 (2020).
Jeon, H. et al. Hysteresis modulation on van der Waals-based ferroelectric field-effect transistor by interfacial passivation technique and its application in optic neural networks. Small 16, 2004371 (2020).
Xiang, H. et al. Enhancing memory window efficiency of ferroelectric transistor for neuromorphic computing via two-dimensional materials integration. Adv. Funct. Mater. 33, 2304657 (2023).
Yap, W. C., Jiang, H., Liu, J., Xia, Q. & Zhu, W. Ferroelectric transistors with monolayer molybdenum disulfide and ultra-thin aluminum-doped hafnium oxide. Appl. Phys. Lett. 111, 013103 (2017).
Migliato Marega, G. et al. A large-scale integrated vector–matrix multiplication processor based on monolayer molybdenum disulfide memories. Nat. Electron. 6, 991–998 (2023).
Burr, G. W. et al. Neuromorphic computing using non-volatile memory. Adv. Phys. X 2, 89–124 (2017).
Duong, N. T. et al. Coupled ferroelectric-photonic memory in a retinomorphic hardware for in-sensor computing. Adv. Sci. 11, 2303447 (2024).
Turashvili, G. & Brogi, E. Tumor heterogeneity in breast cancer. Front. Med. 4, 227 (2017).
Yersal, O. & Barutca, S. Biological subtypes of breast cancer: prognostic and therapeutic implications. World J. Clin. Oncol. 5, 412–424 (2014).
Moreira, I. C. et al. INbreast: toward a full-field digital mammographic database. Acad. Radiol. 19, 236–248 (2012).
Davis, J. & Goadrich, M. The relationship between precision–recall and ROC curves. In Proc. 23rd International Conference on Machine Learning—ICML ’06 (eds Cohen, W. W. & Moore, A.) 233–240 (ACM, 2006); https://doi.org/10.1145/1143844.1143874
Saito, T. & Rehmsmeier, M. The precision-recall plot is more informative than the ROC plot when evaluating binary classifiers on imbalanced datasets. PLoS ONE 10, e0118432 (2015).
Demirkiran, C., Nair, L., Bunandar, D. & Joshi, A. A blueprint for precise and fault-tolerant analog neural networks. Nat. Commun. 15, 5098 (2024).
Moon, S., Shin, K. & Jeon, D. Enhancing reliability of analog neural network processors. IEEE Trans. Very Large Scale Integr. Syst. 27, 1455–1459 (2019).
Gong, N. et al. Signal and noise extraction from analog memory elements for neuromorphic computing. Nat. Commun. 9, 2102 (2018).
Gulrajani, I., Ahmed, F., Arjovsky, M., Dumoulin, V. & Courville, A. Improved training of Wasserstein GANs. In Proc. 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (eds Guyon, I. et al.) 5769–5779 (Curran Associates, 2017).
Acknowledgements
This work is supported by the National Research Foundation (NRF), Prime Minister’s Office, Singapore, under its Competitive Research Program (NRF-CRP24-2020-0002, K.-W.A., NRF-F-CRP-2024-0006, K.-W.A.). L.-J.L thanks the NRF for support (NRF-P2025-002, L.-J.L.). L.-J.L. thanks Nexstrom Pte Ltd, Singapore for MoS2 films.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
This project was supervised and directed by K.-W.A. and L.-J.L. L.L. and W.M. designed the experiments. C.L. and Y.W. synthesized the MoS2 films. L.L. and H.Z. conducted the device fabrication and electrical measurements. H.Z. conducted high-resolution transmission electron microscopy image analysis. J.W., W.Z. and X.F. contributed to the circuit-level simulations. L.L. and H.X. contributed to the simulation of GAN. C.L., H.Z., J.W., W.Z., J.H., J.G., Y.W. and X.F. contributed to discussion and data analysis. L.L., W.M., L.-J.L. and K.-W.A. wrote the paper. All authors discussed the results and approved the final version of the paper.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Sensors thanks Yann-Wen Lan and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Extended data
Extended Data Fig. 1 Area ratio dependent on pulse ID-VG behavior.
The area ratio (AR) is defined as the ferroelectric-to-dielectric area proportion. Pulse ID-VG curves measured from representative devices across a sweep width range from 50 µs to 100 ms for area ratios of: a, AR = 0.4; b, AR = 0.3; c, AR = 0.1; d, AR = 0.06; e, AR = 0.04; f, AR = 0.03.
Extended Data Fig. 2 Cycle-to-cycle transfer characteristics for different area ratios.
Dual-sweep DC measurements over 50 cycles at VD = 100 mV with area ratios of: a, AR = 0.4; b, AR = 0.3; c, AR = 0.1; d, AR = 0.06; e, AR = 0.04; f, AR = 0.03. A total of 50 dual-sweep cycles from representative devices is shown, where the light-blue curves represent individual cycles and the dark-blue line indicates one representative cycle.
Extended Data Fig. 3 Benchmarking with state-of-the-art 2D-FeFETs.
a, Benchmark of state-of-the-art 2D-material FeFETs showing on/off ratio and memory window (MW)18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38. b, Benchmark plot comparing the memory window efficiency and ferroelectric thickness among the reported 2D-FeFETs and our devices18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,28,29,31,32,34,35,36,37.
Extended Data Fig. 4 Response current uniformity under generator operating conditions.
Comparison of 9 individual device currents to the average crossbar array current: measured after programming voltage (VP) a, 4.8 V and b, 6.0 V under generator conditions (tPW = 100 ns), with the read voltage (VD) swept from 0.05 V to 0.562 V in 2 mV increments.
Extended Data Fig. 5 Response current uniformity under discriminator operating conditions.
Current responses of 9 devices in the array under discriminator conditions: a, at 4.6 V and b, at 6.0 V bias voltages, with tPW = 100 µs. VD was swept from 0.05 to 0.306 V in 8-bit steps of 0.01 V.
Extended Data Fig. 6 Schematic of device-based deconvolution for pattern ‘N’.
a, Original 5×5 pattern padded to 7×7 size with zeros. b, The input matrix split into two matrices: one with positive values and another with negative values multiplied by –1. c, Two sets of 3×3 devices, programmed with the corresponding voltages and serving as kernels, are transposed and simultaneously used to perform operations with the input pattern. d, Pattern ‘N’ is derived from the final current response of the differential circuit formed by the two sub-arrays.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information (download PDF )
Supplementary Figs. 1–13 and Table 1.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Li, L., Li, C., Zheng, H. et al. Dual-mode ferroelectric transistors for high-performance generative-adversarial-network-based imaging. Nat. Sens. 1, 222–231 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44460-025-00024-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44460-025-00024-w


