Cultural Theory in Public Policy and Governance

Cultural Theory offers a framework for understanding how divergent social worldviews shape policy preferences, governance structures and risk perceptions. Originating from grid–group dimensions of social regulation and cohesion, it identifies four archetypal perspectives—hierarchism, individualism, egalitarianism and fatalism—through which actors interpret policy challenges and design institutional responses. In the realm of public policy and governance, Cultural Theory has elucidated why different communities endorse contrasting regulatory approaches, why certain groups mobilise for or against environmental measures, and how notions of legitimacy and fairness emerge in policy processes. It has been applied to analyse environmental democracy, public participation, risk regulation, conflict intensity and the embedding of expert knowledge within cultural frames. By recognising the interplay between cultural biases and policy instruments, this theory informs the tailoring of engagement strategies, enhances procedural equity and supports more resilient governance across diverse political and social contexts.

Research from Nature Portfolio

No recent Nature Portfolio content available.

Cultural Theory in Public Policy and Governance publication trend

The graph below shows the total number of articles in cultural theory in public policy and governance across all publications each year (not limited to Nature Index journals).

Technical terms

Cultural Theory: An analytical framework positing that policy attitudes and risk perceptions are shaped by underlying cultural worldviews defined along dimensions of social regulation (grid) and cohesion (group).

Hierarchism: A cultural orientation characterised by high social regulation and strong group cohesion, favouring structured authority and rule-based governance.

Individualism: A cultural orientation marked by low regulatory constraints and low group cohesion, emphasising personal autonomy and market-driven solutions.

Egalitarianism: A cultural orientation featuring low regulation and high group cohesion, prioritising collective welfare, equality and participatory decision-making.

Fatalism: A cultural orientation defined by high regulation with low group cohesion, associated with feelings of powerlessness and scepticism towards institutional change.

Procedural Justice: The principle that policy processes should be fair and transparent, ensuring both equal opportunity for participation and authentic influence on outcomes.

References

1. How culture shapes environmental public participation: case studies of China, the Netherlands, and Italy. Journal of Chinese Governance (2018).
2. How the Perception of Public Official on Organizational Culture Influences Procedural Justice in Environmental Policy Processes. Frontiers in Psychology (2021).
3. Policy expertise and culture: the case of “civil sexuality” in Iran.. International Review of Public Policy (2021).