Summary

Obesity represents a major modifiable risk factor for the development and progression of heart failure. Excess adiposity contributes to structural and functional alterations in the myocardium, promotes systemic inflammation, exacerbates neurohormonal activation and fosters comorbidities such as hypertension and type 2 diabetes. Paradoxically, epidemiological studies have reported that individuals with established heart failure and higher body mass index often exhibit better short-term survival than those of normal weight, a phenomenon termed the obesity paradox. This apparent protective effect varies by heart failure phenotype: it is most evident in patients with reduced ejection fraction but less pronounced or absent in those with preserved ejection fraction when diabetes is present. Recent work has emphasised the limitations of body mass index alone and highlighted new anthropometric indices that more accurately capture fat distribution and lean mass. A more nuanced understanding of the interplay between adiposity, muscle wasting and metabolic derangements is now shaping tailored strategies for risk stratification and management across the spectrum of heart failure severity.

Research from Nature Portfolio

Innovative anthropometric indices have been compared with traditional measures to predict incident heart failure in community cohorts. The relative fat mass index, which accounts for height and waist circumference, exhibited a stronger association with heart failure risk than body mass index, waist-hip ratio or body-shape index, and improved predictive models across preserved and reduced ejection fraction subtypes. In acute decompensated heart failure, a granular analysis of body mass index categories revealed that severely underweight patients faced substantially higher one-year mortality, whereas the apparent survival advantage of overweight and obese groups diminished after adjustment for clinical confounders. These findings underscore the importance of identifying very low body mass alongside novel adiposity markers to refine prognostic assessment and guide nutritional and pharmacological interventions in patients with heart failure.

Obesity Impact on Heart Failure Outcomes publication trend

The graph below shows the total number of articles in obesity impact on heart failure outcomes across all publications each year (not limited to Nature Index journals).

Technical terms

Body mass index (BMI): A ratio of weight to height squared used to classify underweight, normal weight, overweight and obesity.

Ejection fraction (EF): The percentage of blood ejected from the left ventricle with each heartbeat; used to distinguish reduced (HFrEF) from preserved (HFpEF) function.

Relative fat mass (RFM): An anthropometric index derived from height and waist circumference that estimates whole-body adiposity more accurately than BMI.

Waist-to-height ratio (WHtR): A measure of central adiposity calculated by dividing waist circumference by height; reflects visceral fat burden.

References

  1. Anthropometric measures and adverse outcomes in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: revisiting the obesity paradox. European Heart Journal (2023).
  2. Obesity in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction with and without diabetes: risk factor or innocent bystander?. European Journal of Preventive Cardiology (2023).
  3. The Impact of Obesity on the Cardiovascular System. Journal of Diabetes Research (2018).
  4. Relative fat mass, a new index of adiposity, is strongly associated with incident heart failure: data from PREVEND. Scientific Reports (2022).
  5. Association between body mass index and prognosis of patients hospitalized with heart failure. Scientific Reports (2020).

About these summaries

This Nature Research Intelligence Topic summary is created with the cited references and a large language model. We take care to ground generated text with facts, and have systems in place to gain human feedback on the overall quality of the process in line with our AI principles. We strive to create accurate and useful summaries for people unfamiliar with the research topic and that supports this goal. These pages are a beta release and will be updated as we learn how best to help people gain value from a research topic summary.

Nature Strategy Reports
Turn complex research questions into confident strategic decisions 

When you're under pressure to set direction, justify investment, or understand your competitive position, you need more than raw data — you need trusted insights you can act on.

  • Benchmark your performance against global peers using robust, methodologically sound analysis.

  • Combine quantitative metrics with qualitative expert insight to uncover strengths, gaps and emerging opportunities.

  • Gain tailored, decision-ready recommendations aligned to your strategic priorities.

Talk to us to learn more about our data dashboards and bespoke strategy reports.

Nature Masterclasses
Grow research skills, confidence and careers with training built for every stage of the research lifecycle.

Developed with Nature Portfolio journal Editors and internationally renowned experts. Discover three ways to learn:

  • Self-paced, online courses in convenient bite-sized units, covering key skills across scientific writing, publishing, grant writing, data analysis, and more.

  • Expert trainer-led workshops with hands-on exercises and real-time feedback across core research skills, delivered via interactive group sessions.

  • Editor-led workshops combining core principles in writing and publishing, personalised 1:1 feedback from Nature Portfolio Editors and hands-on exercises.

Explore course catalogues and workshop agendas, enquire about the options or request institutional pricing.