Summary

Republican political theory conceives freedom as non-domination rather than mere non-interference. It holds that individuals are free when they are not subject to arbitrary power or the constant threat of intervention by others. Applied to the workplace, this framework locates the sources of domination in hierarchical relations, managerial prerogative and ownership structures. It emphasises how structural dependencies and discretionary authority can render workers vulnerable to arbitrary control, even in the absence of overt coercion.

Workplace democracy emerges as a practical response, seeking to redistribute decision-making power across all members of an organisation. Models range from codetermination and employee representation on boards to fully worker-owned cooperatives. Such arrangements aim to establish institutional checks on management, enhance collective agency and secure conditions under which workers can exercise meaningful autonomy. Empirical studies—from European supervisory boards to Latin American cooperative networks—highlight both the promise of democratic governance in reducing domination and the practical challenges involved in scaling participatory structures.

Research from Nature Portfolio

No recent Nature Portfolio content available.

Republican Theory and Workplace Democracy publication trend

The graph below shows the total number of articles in republican theory and workplace democracy across all publications each year (not limited to Nature Index journals).

Technical terms

Non-domination: A conception of freedom defined by the absence of arbitrary interference or the capacity of one party to impose its will on another.

Workplace democracy: Institutional arrangements that allocate decision-making authority among workers, typically through representation, voting rights or cooperative ownership.

Managerial discretion: The power of managers to make unilateral decisions affecting employees without effective constraints or oversight.

Structural domination: A form of arbitrary power rooted in systemic dependencies and lack of reasonable alternatives, rather than direct interference.

References

  1. Domination at Work: Resisting the Radical Diagnosis. British Journal of Political Science (2023).
  2. Structural Domination and Freedom in the Labor Market: From Voluntariness to Independence. American Political Science Review (2022).
  3. The Epistemology of Corporate Power: The Limits of the Firm–State Analogy. Journal of Applied Philosophy (2024).
Nature Strategy Reports
Turn complex research questions into confident strategic decisions 

When you're under pressure to set direction, justify investment, or understand your competitive position, you need more than raw data — you need trusted insights you can act on.

  • Benchmark your performance against global peers using robust, methodologically sound analysis.

  • Combine quantitative metrics with qualitative expert insight to uncover strengths, gaps and emerging opportunities.

  • Gain tailored, decision-ready recommendations aligned to your strategic priorities.

Talk to us to learn more about our data dashboards and bespoke strategy reports.

Nature Masterclasses
Grow research skills, confidence and careers with training built for every stage of the research lifecycle.

Developed with Nature Portfolio journal Editors and internationally renowned experts. Discover three ways to learn:

  • Self-paced, online courses in convenient bite-sized units, covering key skills across scientific writing, publishing, grant writing, data analysis, and more.

  • Expert trainer-led workshops with hands-on exercises and real-time feedback across core research skills, delivered via interactive group sessions.

  • Editor-led workshops combining core principles in writing and publishing, personalised 1:1 feedback from Nature Portfolio Editors and hands-on exercises.

Explore course catalogues and workshop agendas, enquire about the options or request institutional pricing.