Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Nature Communications
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. nature communications
  3. articles
  4. article
Chromatin-intrinsic mechanisms determine orientation-specific class switch recombination
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 28 February 2026

Chromatin-intrinsic mechanisms determine orientation-specific class switch recombination

  • Sha Luo1,2,3 na1,
  • Ruolin Qiao1,2,3 na1,
  • Hailiang Zha1,2 na1,
  • Leyi Yu1,2 na1,
  • Xiaoling Shan1,2,
  • Shuchan Li1,2,
  • Zifan Yang1,2,
  • Aoyu Ma1,2,
  • Yaxin Cheng4,
  • Yao-Feng Zhao  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-4499-86104 &
  • …
  • Xuefei Zhang  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-1873-66791,2,3 

Nature Communications , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 2350 Accesses

  • 2 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Chromatin
  • Chromatin structure
  • Class switch recombination

Abstract

Activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID)-initiated immunoglobulin heavy chain (Igh) class switch recombination (CSR) replaces donor Cμ constant region exons (CHs) with a downstream acceptor CH to generate different functional antibody isotypes. However, mechanisms governing orientation-specific productive CSR remain incompletely understood. Through analysing the characteristics of evolved constant regions and constructing diversified constant regions to recapitulate productive CSR in jawed vertebrates to systematically dissect productive CSR determinants, we find that switch topological configuration (STC), including transcriptional orientation, chromatin distance, and chromatin domain of Igh, determines orientation-specific joining of AID-initiated breaks for productive CSR. Long-distance CHs under co-oriented transcription within Igh domain foster predominantly deletional joining-mediated productive CSR. In contrast, oppositely transcribed and short-distance CHs affect end-joining bias via promoting diffusion-mediated inversional joining for CSR with lower efficiency. Moreover, AID-initiated breaks in different domains, facilitate more diffusion-mediated orientation-unbiased end-joining for non-productive CSR. Our findings uncover chromatin-intrinsic mechanisms safeguarding orientation-specific productive CSR throughout evolution.

Similar content being viewed by others

The role of chromatin loop extrusion in antibody diversification

Article 15 February 2022

DIS3 mutations enhance AID-driven translocations during B-cell activation, promoting transformation to multiple myeloma

Article Open access 14 March 2026

Interplay between CTCF-binding and CTCF-lacking regulatory elements in generating an architectural stripe at the Igh locus

Article Open access 03 March 2025

Data availability

CSR-HTGTS-seq, 3C-HTGTS, Pro-seq, and ChIP-seq sequencing data analyzed here have been deposited in the GEO database. The GEO accession number for CSR-HTGTS-seq is GSE299392. The GEO accession number for 3C-HTGTS is GSE299499. The GEO accession number for Pro-seq is GSE299975. The GEO accession number for ChIP-seq is GSE299391. All other data can be found in the Supplementary Data of this paper or in the Source Data. This includes all uncropped gel electrophoresis images and data shown in graphs throughout the manuscript, including the Supplementary Figs. All data are available from the authors upon reasonable request. Source data are provided with this paper.

Code availability

V(D)J-HTGTS-seq, CSR-HTGTS-seq, and 3C-HTGTS data was processed through published pipelines (http://robinmeyers.github.io/transloc_pipeline/). Pro-Seq was aligned to either the mm9 genome or modified genomes with bowtie2 (v.2.4.4) (http://bowtie-bio.sourceforge.net/bowtie2/index.shtml), processed by samtools (v.1.15.1) (https://sourceforge.net/projects/samtools/fles/samtools/1.15.1/), and generated graph files via the RseqQ (v.5.0.1) (https://rseqc.sourceforge.net/) package. ChIP-Seq was aligned to the mm9-derived modified genomes with bowtie2 (v.2.4.4), processed by samtools (v.1.15.1), generated bigwig files via Deeptools (v.3.5.1) (https://github.com/deeptools/deepTools), and generated peak files via MACS2 (v.2.2.7.1) (https://github.com/taoliu/MACS/).

References

  1. Bonilla, F. A. & Oettgen, H. C. Adaptive immunity. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 125, S33–S40 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Teng, G. & Schatz, D. G. Regulation and evolution of the RAG recombinase. Adv. Immunol. 128, 1–39 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alt, F. W., Zhang, Y., Meng, F. L., Guo, C. & Schwer, B. Mechanisms of programmed DNA lesions and genomic instability in the immune system. Cell 152, 417–429 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Methot, S. P. & Di Noia, J. M. Molecular mechanisms of somatic hypermutation and class switch recombination. Adv. Immunol. 133, 37–87 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Oudinet, C., Braikia, F. Z., Dauba, A. & Khamlichi, A. A. Mechanism and regulation of class switch recombination by IgH transcriptional control elements. Adv. Immunol. 147, 89–137 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fudenberg, G. et al. Formation of chromosomal domains by loop extrusion. Cell Rep. 15, 2038–2049 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sanborn, A. L. et al. Chromatin extrusion explains key features of loop and domain formation in wild-type and engineered genomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112, E6456–E6465 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bruzeau, C., Moreau, J., Le Noir, S. & Pinaud, E. Panorama of stepwise involvement of the IgH 3’ regulatory region in murine B cells. Adv. Immunol. 149, 95–114 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang, X. et al. Fundamental roles of chromatin loop extrusion in antibody class switching. Nature 575, 385–389 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang, Y., Zhang, X., Dai, H. Q., Hu, H. & Alt, F. W. The role of chromatin loop extrusion in antibody diversification. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 22, 550–566 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Muramatsu, M. et al. Class switch recombination and hypermutation require activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID), a potential RNA editing enzyme. Cell 102, 553–563 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Feng, Y., Seija, N., Di Noia, J. M. & Martin, A. AID in antibody diversification: there and back again. Trends Immunol. 42, 89 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Luo, S., Qiao, R. & Zhang, X. DNA damage response and repair in adaptive immunity. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 10, 884873 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Saha, T., Sundaravinayagam, D. & Di Virgilio, M. Charting a DNA repair roadmap for immunoglobulin class switch recombination. Trends Biochem. Sci. 46, 184–199 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Yu, K. AID function in somatic hypermutation and class switch recombination. Acta Biochim. Biophys. Sin. 54, 759–766 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Garrett, F. E. et al. Chromatin architecture near a potential 3’ end of the igh locus involves modular regulation of histone modifications during B-Cell development and in vivo occupancy at CTCF sites. Mol. Cell Biol. 25, 1511–1525 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang, X., Yoon, H. S., Chapdelaine-Williams, A. M., Kyritsis, N. & Alt, F. W. Physiological role of the 3’IgH CBEs super-anchor in antibody class switching. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2024392118 (2021).

  18. Yu, K. An insulator that regulates chromatin extrusion and class switch recombination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2026399118 (2021).

  19. Chiarle, R. et al. Genome-wide translocation sequencing reveals mechanisms of chromosome breaks and rearrangements in B cells. Cell 147, 107–119 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wei, P. C. et al. Long neural genes harbor recurrent DNA break clusters in neural stem/progenitor cells. Cell 164, 644–655 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Frock, R. L. et al. Genome-wide detection of DNA double-stranded breaks induced by engineered nucleases. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 179–186 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Dong, J. et al. Orientation-specific joining of AID-initiated DNA breaks promotes antibody class switching. Nature 525, 134–139 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Reina-San-Martin, B., Chen, H. T., Nussenzweig, A. & Nussenzweig, M. C. ATM is required for efficient recombination between immunoglobulin switch regions. J. Exp. Med. 200, 1103–1110 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lumsden, J. M. et al. Immunoglobulin class switch recombination is impaired in Atm-deficient mice. J. Exp. Med. 200, 1111–1121 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Panchakshari, R. A. et al. DNA double-strand break response factors influence end-joining features of IgH class switch and general translocation junctions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115, 762–767 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Reina-San-Martin, B. et al. H2AX is required for recombination between immunoglobulin switch regions but not for intra-switch region recombination or somatic hypermutation. J. Exp. Med. 197, 1767–1778 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Bothmer, A. et al. 53BP1 regulates DNA resection and the choice between classical and alternative end joining during class switch recombination. J. Exp. Med. 207, 855–865 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Bothmer, A. et al. Regulation of DNA end joining, resection, and immunoglobulin class switch recombination by 53BP1. Mol. Cell 42, 319–329 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Chapman, J. R. et al. RIF1 is essential for 53BP1-dependent nonhomologous end joining and suppression of DNA double-strand break resection. Mol. Cell 49, 858–871 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Di Virgilio, M. et al. Rif1 prevents resection of DNA breaks and promotes immunoglobulin class switching. Science 339, 711–715 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Xu, G. et al. REV7 counteracts DNA double-strand break resection and affects PARP inhibition. Nature 521, 541–544 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Boersma, V. et al. MAD2L2 controls DNA repair at telomeres and DNA breaks by inhibiting 5’ end resection. Nature 521, 537–540 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ghezraoui, H. et al. 53BP1 cooperation with the REV7-shieldin complex underpins DNA structure-specific NHEJ. Nature 560, 122–127 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Mirman, Z. et al. 53BP1-RIF1-shieldin counteracts DSB resection through CST- and Polalpha-dependent fill-in. Nature 560, 112–116 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Noordermeer, S. M. et al. The shieldin complex mediates 53BP1-dependent DNA repair. Nature 560, 117–121 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Dev, H. et al. Shieldin complex promotes DNA end-joining and counters homologous recombination in BRCA1-null cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 20, 954–965 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Vincendeau, E. et al. SHLD1 is dispensable for 53BP1-dependent V(D)J recombination but critical for productive class switch recombination. Nat. Commun. 13, 3707 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Han, L. & Yu, K. Altered kinetics of nonhomologous end joining and class switch recombination in ligase IV-deficient B cells. J. Exp. Med. 205, 2745–2753 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Du, L. et al. Orientation regulation of class-switch recombination in human B cells. J. Immunol. 213, 1093–1104 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Kitao, H., Arakawa, H., Yamagishi, H. & Shimizu, A. Chicken immunoglobulin mu-chain gene: germline organization and tandem repeats characteristic of class switch recombination. Immunol. Lett. 52, 99–104 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Sun, Y., Huang, T., Hammarstrom, L. & Zhao, Y. The immunoglobulins: new insights, implications, and applications. Annu. Rev. Anim. Biosci. 8, 145–169 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Nakamura, M. et al. High frequency class switching of an IgM+ B lymphoma clone CH12F3 to IgA+ cells. Int. Immunol. 8, 193–201 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Fudenberg, G., Abdennur, N., Imakaev, M., Goloborodko, A. & Mirny, L. A. Emerging evidence of chromosome folding by loop extrusion. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 82, 45–55 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Stadhouders, R. et al. Transcription factors orchestrate dynamic interplay between genome topology and gene regulation during cell reprogramming. Nat. Genet. 50, 238–249 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Dequeker, B. J. H. et al. MCM complexes are barriers that restrict cohesin-mediated loop extrusion. Nature 606, 197–203 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Zhang, Y. et al. The fundamental role of chromatin loop extrusion in physiological V(D)J recombination. Nature 573, 600–604 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Zhang, H. et al. CTCF and R-loops are boundaries of cohesin-mediated DNA looping. Mol. Cell 83, 2856–2871.e2858 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Jeppsson, K. et al. Cohesin-dependent chromosome loop extrusion is limited by transcription and stalled replication forks. Sci. Adv. 8, eabn7063 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Rao, S. S. P. et al. Cohesin loss eliminates all loop domains. Cell 171, 305–320.e324 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Kane, L. et al. Cohesin is required for long-range enhancer action at the locus. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 29, 891–897 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Rinzema, N. J. et al. Building regulatory landscapes reveals that an enhancer can recruit cohesin to create contact domains, engage CTCF sites and activate distant genes. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 29, 563–574 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Zhang, Y. W. et al. Molecular basis for differential Igk versus Igh V(D)J joining mechanisms. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07477-y (2024).

  53. Pan, T. et al. Genomic insights and the conservation potential of captive breeding: the case of Chinese alligator. Sci. Adv. 11, eadm7980 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Manso, T. et al. IMGT® databases, related tools and web resources through three main axes of research and development. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, D1262–D1272 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Yang, H. et al. A map of cis-regulatory elements and 3D genome structures in zebrafish. Nature 588, 337–343 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Buisine, N. et al. Xenopus tropicalis genome re-scaffolding and re-annotation reach the resolution required for in vivo ChIA-PET analysis. PLoS ONE 10, e0137526 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Nuthalapati, N. K. et al. Transcriptomic analysis of early B-cell development in the chicken embryo. Poult. Sci. 98, 5342–5354 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  58. He, P. et al. The changing mouse embryo transcriptome at whole tissue and single-cell resolution. Nature 583, 760–76 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Hellsten, U. et al. The genome of the Western clawed frog Xenopus tropicalis. Science 328, 633–636 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Rhie, A. et al. Towards complete and error-free genome assemblies of all vertebrate species. Nature 592, 737–746 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Rivas, M. A. et al. Smc3 dosage regulates B cell transit through germinal centers and restricts their malignant transformation. Nat. Immunol. 22, 240–U278 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Mahat, D. B. et al. Base-pair-resolution genome-wide mapping of active RNA polymerases using precision nuclear run-on (PRO-seq). Nat. Protoc. 11, 1455–1476 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Schmidl, C., Rendeiro, A. F., Sheffield, N. C. & Bock, C. ChIPmentation: fast, robust, low-input ChIP-seq for histones and transcription factors. Nat. Methods 12, 963–965 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Drs. Frederick W. Alt and Tasuku Honjo for providing reagents. We thank Drs. Xiaoliang Sunney Xie, Zemin Zhang, Fuchou Tang, Guoqiang Li, Jiazhi Hu, and Hsiang-Ying Lee for some technical support. We thank all Zhang lab members for helpful discussions. This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2022YFA1305000 to X.Z.), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32270930 to X.Z.), the Beijing Natural Science Foundation (5232007 to X.Z.), and the Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Genomics at Peking University.

Author information

Author notes
  1. These authors contributed equally: Sha Luo, Ruolin Qiao, Hailiang Zha, Leyi Yu.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Biomedical Pioneering Innovation Center (BIOPIC), School of Life Science, Peking University, Beijing, China

    Sha Luo, Ruolin Qiao, Hailiang Zha, Leyi Yu, Xiaoling Shan, Shuchan Li, Zifan Yang, Aoyu Ma & Xuefei Zhang

  2. Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Genomics (ICG), Peking University, Beijing, China

    Sha Luo, Ruolin Qiao, Hailiang Zha, Leyi Yu, Xiaoling Shan, Shuchan Li, Zifan Yang, Aoyu Ma & Xuefei Zhang

  3. Joint Graduate Program of Peking-Tsinghua-NIBS, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Peking University, Beijing, China

    Sha Luo, Ruolin Qiao & Xuefei Zhang

  4. State Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, College of Biological Sciences, National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, Frontiers Science Center for Molecular Design Breeding, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China

    Yaxin Cheng & Yao-Feng Zhao

Authors
  1. Sha Luo
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ruolin Qiao
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hailiang Zha
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Leyi Yu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xiaoling Shan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Shuchan Li
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Zifan Yang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Aoyu Ma
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Yaxin Cheng
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Yao-Feng Zhao
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Xuefei Zhang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

S.L. (Sha Luo), R.Q., and X.Z. designed the study; S.L. (Sha Luo), R.Q., X.S., S.L. (Shuchan Li), Z.Y., and A.M performed the experiments; H.Z., and L.Y. designed some of the bioinformatics pipelines; S.L. (Sha Luo), R.Q., H.Z., and X.Z. analysed the data; S.L. (Sha Luo), R.Q., H.Z., L.Y., and X.Z. prepared the figures with some input from Y.C. and Y-F.Z.; S.L. (Sha Luo), R.Q., H.Z., L.Y., and X.Z. wrote the manuscript. X.Z. managed and supervised the project.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xuefei Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (download PDF )

Description of Additional Supplementary Files (download PDF )

Supplementary Data 1 (download XLSX )

Supplementary Data 2 (download XLSX )

Reporting Summary (download PDF )

Transparent Peer Review file (download PDF )

Source data

Source Data (download XLSX )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Luo, S., Qiao, R., Zha, H. et al. Chromatin-intrinsic mechanisms determine orientation-specific class switch recombination. Nat Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-70031-z

Download citation

  • Received: 23 September 2025

  • Accepted: 17 February 2026

  • Published: 28 February 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-70031-z

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Videos
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Editors
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors' Highlights
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Top Articles

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • For Reviewers
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Nature Communications (Nat Commun)

ISSN 2041-1723 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing