Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

npj Digital Medicine
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. npj digital medicine
  3. articles
  4. article
A machine learning–enabled blood transcriptomic signature for digital diagnosis and subtyping of Alzheimer’s disease
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 05 January 2026

A machine learning–enabled blood transcriptomic signature for digital diagnosis and subtyping of Alzheimer’s disease

  • Shuo Ma1,2 na1,
  • Dawen Chen1,2 na1,
  • Yanzhi Li3,
  • Yanxia Liu4,
  • Meiling Zhou1,2,
  • Jiwei Wang1,2,
  • Yuming Yao1,2,
  • Yinhao Chen5 &
  • …
  • Guoqiu Wu1,2,6 

npj Digital Medicine , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 2118 Accesses

  • 10 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Biomarkers
  • Diseases
  • Neurology
  • Neuroscience

Abstract

Early and accessible detection of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) remains a major clinical challenge. We developed a machine learning–based blood transcriptomic model, the Lactylation-Derived Score (LDS), from lactylation-related genes across nine AD cohorts, using a standardized pipeline with z-score normalization, random forest–based feature screening, plsRglm modeling, and 10-fold cross-validation. LDS was externally tested in seven independent brain transcriptomic datasets and clinically validated in an independent plasma cohort (n = 540); logistic regression was used to integrate LDS with plasma phosphorylated tau 181 (p-tau181) and p-tau217. LDS achieved an AUC of 0.897 (95% CI 0.849–0.934) in the Training Cohort and 0.772 (95% CI 0.729–0.815) in the plasma validation cohort, while the three-marker model (LDS + p-tau181 + p-tau217) yielded the highest diagnostic performance (AUC 0.859, 95% CI 0.824–0.893). LDS alone effectively identified AT⁺ individuals (AUC 0.861, 95% CI 0.827–0.897), and a five-gene classifier derived from LDS genes stratified amnestic mild cognitive impairment with an AUC of 0.809 (95% CI 0.714–0.836). LDS-high individuals showed neuroinflammatory activation and metabolic stress signatures, indicating that this scalable, interpretable transcriptomic model complements plasma p-tau biomarkers and supports precision digital medicine in AD.

Similar content being viewed by others

Interpretable deep learning framework for understanding molecular changes in human brains with Alzheimer’s disease: implications for microglia activation and sex differences

Article Open access 16 July 2025

Integrated algorithm combining plasma biomarkers and cognitive assessments accurately predicts brain β-amyloid pathology

Article Open access 10 May 2023

Correlations of blood and brain NMR metabolomics with Alzheimer’s disease mouse models

Article Open access 18 March 2025

Data availability

The public transcriptomic datasets used in this study were obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database under accession numbers GSE5281, GSE84422, GSE122063, GSE132903, GSE28146, GSE48350, GSE36980, GSE37263, and GSE29378. These datasets are freely available at “https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/. The independent plasma cohort data generated and analyzed during this study are not publicly available due to ethical and privacy restrictions but are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request and with appropriate institutional approval.

Code availability

The analytical codes involved in this study can be obtained by contacting the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. 2021 Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures. Alzheimers Dement 2021, 17:327-406.

  2. Granzotto, A. & Sensi, S. L. Once upon a time, the Amyloid Cascade Hypothesis. Ageing Res. Rev. 93, 102161 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Apostolova, L. G. Alzheimer disease. Continuum 22, 419–434 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Muhigwa, A. & Kalenzaga, S. Psychological and behavioral symptoms in Alzheimer’s disease: Impact on professional caregivers burden and non-pharmacological management strategies. NPG Neurologie Psychiatr. Gériatrie 25, 203–210 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Leidal, A. M., Levine, B. & Debnath, J. Autophagy and the cell biology of age-related disease. Nat. Cell Biol. 20, 1338–1348 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Scheltens, P. et al. Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet 397, 1577–1590 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Congdon, E. E., Ji, C., Tetlow, A. M., Jiang, Y. & Sigurdsson, E. M. Tau-targeting therapies for Alzheimer disease: current status and future directions. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 19, 715–736 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Karran, E. & De Strooper, B. The amyloid hypothesis in Alzheimer disease: new insights from new therapeutics. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 21, 306–318 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zagórska A., Czopek A., Fryc M., Jaromin A. & Boyd B. J. Drug discovery and development targeting dementia. Pharmaceuticals 16, (2023).

  10. Sharon O. et al. Slow wave synchrony during NREM sleep tracks cognitive impairment in prodromal Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s Dement. 21, (2025).

  11. Ostrowitzki, S. et al. Evaluating the safety and efficacy of crenezumab vs placebo in adults With Early Alzheimer disease: two phase 3 randomized placebo-controlled trials. JAMA Neurol. 79, 1113–1121 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Karikari, T. K. et al. Diagnostic performance and prediction of clinical progression of plasma phospho-tau181 in the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Mol. Psychiatry 26, 429–442 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dubois, B., von Arnim, C. A. F., Burnie, N., Bozeat, S. & Cummings, J. Biomarkers in Alzheimer’s disease: role in early and differential diagnosis and recognition of atypical variants. Alzheimers Res. Ther. 15, 175 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zhou, J. et al. Astrocytic LRP1 enables mitochondria transfer to neurons and mitigates brain ischemic stroke by suppressing ARF1 lactylation. Cell Metab. 36, 2054–2068.e2014 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Yang, H. et al. Microglia lactylation in relation to central nervous system diseases. Neural Regen. Res. 20, 29–40 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Xu, K., Zhang, K., Wang, Y. & Gu, Y. Comprehensive review of histone lactylation: structure, function, and therapeutic targets. Biochem. Pharm. 225, 116331 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang, D. et al. Metabolic regulation of gene expression by histone lactylation. Nature 574, 575–580 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Yang, Z. et al. Lactylome analysis suggests lactylation-dependent mechanisms of metabolic adaptation in hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat. Metab. 5, 61–79 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Yang, K. et al. Lactate promotes macrophage HMGB1 lactylation, acetylation, and exosomal release in polymicrobial sepsis. Cell Death Differ. 29, 133–146 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang, T., Huang, Q. & Gan, K. F. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomal lactate dehydrogenase A promotes tendon-bone healing via histone lactylation-mediated cartilage regeneration. World J. Stem Cells 17, 106282 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gräff, J. et al. An epigenetic blockade of cognitive functions in the neurodegenerating brain. Nature 483, 222–226 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Calil, V. et al. Challenges in the diagnosis of dementia: insights from the United Kingdom-Brazil Dementia Workshop. Dement. Neuropsychol. 14, 201–208 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Landau, S. M. et al. Amyloid PET imaging in Alzheimer’s disease: a comparison of three radiotracers. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 41, 1398–1407 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Chong, J. R. et al. Plasma P-tau181 to Aβ42 ratio is associated with brain amyloid burden and hippocampal atrophy in an Asian cohort of Alzheimer’s disease patients with concomitant cerebrovascular disease. Alzheimers Dement. 17, 1649–1662 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Janelidze, S. et al. Head-to-Head Comparison of 8 Plasma Amyloid-β 42/40 Assays in Alzheimer Disease. JAMA Neurol. 78, 1375–1382 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mendes, A. J. et al. Head-to-head study of diagnostic accuracy of plasma and cerebrospinal fluid p-tau217 versus p-tau181 and p-tau231 in a memory clinic cohort. J. Neurol. 271, 2053–2066 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kirsebom, B. E. et al. Repeated plasma p-tau217 measurements to monitor clinical progression heterogeneity. Alzheimers Dement. 21, e70319 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kahouadji, S. et al. Evaluation of serum NFL, T-tau, p-tau181, p-tau217, Aβ40 and Aβ42 for the diagnosis of neurodegenerative diseases. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. (2024).

  29. Mielke, M. M. et al. Comparison of plasma phosphorylated tau species with amyloid and tau positron emission tomography, neurodegeneration, vascular pathology, and cognitive outcomes. JAMA Neurol. 78, 1108–1117 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Muir, R. T., Ismail, Z., Black, S. E. & Smith, E. E. Comparative methods for quantifying plasma biomarkers in Alzheimer’s disease: implications for the next frontier in cerebral amyloid angiopathy diagnostics. Alzheimers Dement. 20, 1436–1458 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Graham, N. S. N. et al. Axonal marker neurofilament light predicts long-term outcomes and progressive neurodegeneration after traumatic brain injury. Sci. Transl. Med. 13, eabg9922 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Guo, S. et al. Developing diagnostic biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease based on histone lactylation-related gene. Heliyon 10, e37807 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Harris, R. A. et al. Aerobic glycolysis in the frontal cortex correlates with memory performance in wild-type mice but not the APP/PS1 mouse model of cerebral amyloidosis. J. Neurosci. 36, 1871–1878 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Weaver, K. E. et al. Posterior cingulate lactate as a metabolic biomarker in amnestic mild cognitive impairment. Biomed. Res. Int. 2015, 610605 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Liguori, C. et al. CSF lactate levels, τ proteins, cognitive decline: a dynamic relationship in Alzheimer’s disease. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 86, 655–659 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Gao, Y., Aljazi, M. B., Wu, Y. & He, J. Vorinostat, a histone deacetylase inhibitor, ameliorates the sociability and cognitive memory in an Ash1L-deletion-induced ASD/ID mouse model. Neurosci. Lett. 764, 136241 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Liu, J., Wang, L. N. & Jia, J. P. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma agonists for Alzheimer’s disease and amnestic mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Drugs Aging 32, 57–65 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Readhead, B. et al. Multiscale analysis of independent Alzheimer’s cohorts finds disruption of molecular, genetic, and clinical networks by human herpesvirus. Neuron 99, 64–82.e67 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Wang, M. et al. Integrative network analysis of nineteen brain regions identifies molecular signatures and networks underlying selective regional vulnerability to Alzheimer’s disease. Genome Med. 8, 104 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  40. McKay, E. C. et al. Peri-infarct upregulation of the oxytocin receptor in vascular dementia. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 78, 436–452 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Piras, I. S. et al. Transcriptome changes in the Alzheimer’s disease middle temporal gyrus: importance of RNA metabolism and mitochondria-associated membrane genes. J. Alzheimers Dis. 70, 691–713 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Blalock, E. M., Buechel, H. M., Popovic, J., Geddes, J. W. & Landfield, P. W. Microarray analyses of laser-captured hippocampus reveal distinct gray and white matter signatures associated with incipient Alzheimer’s disease. J. Chem. Neuroanat. 42, 118–126 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Sárvári, M. et al. Menopause leads to elevated expression of macrophage-associated genes in the aging frontal cortex: rat and human studies identify strikingly similar changes. J. Neuroinflammation 9, 264 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Hokama, M. et al. Altered expression of diabetes-related genes in Alzheimer’s disease brains: the Hisayama study. Cereb. Cortex 24, 2476–2488 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Tan, M. G. et al. Genome wide profiling of altered gene expression in the neocortex of Alzheimer’s disease. J. Neurosci. Res. 88, 1157–1169 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Yao Z. et al. Age-related decline in hippocampal tyrosine phosphatase PTPRO is a mechanistic factor in chemotherapy-related cognitive impairment. JCI Insight 8 (2023).

  47. Davis, S. & Meltzer, P. S. GEOquery: a bridge between the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and BioConductor. Bioinformatics 23, 1846–1847 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Leek, J. T., Johnson, W. E., Parker, H. S., Jaffe, A. E. & Storey, J. D. The sva package for removing batch effects and other unwanted variation in high-throughput experiments. Bioinformatics 28, 882–883 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Sun, Z. et al. Construction of a lactate-related prognostic signature for predicting prognosis, tumor microenvironment, and immune response in kidney renal clear cell carcinoma. Front. Immunol. 13, 818984 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Zeng, D. et al. IOBR: multi-omics immuno-oncology biological research to decode tumor microenvironment and signatures. Front. Immunol. 12, 687975 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Charoentong, P. et al. Pan-cancer immunogenomic analyses reveal genotype-immunophenotype relationships and predictors of response to checkpoint blockade. Cell Rep. 18, 248–262 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Yoshihara, K. et al. Inferring tumour purity and stromal and immune cell admixture from expression data. Nat. Commun. 4, 2612 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Zhang, Y. & Kiryu, H. Identification of oxidative stress-related genes differentially expressed in Alzheimer’s disease and construction of a hub gene-based diagnostic model. Sci. Rep. 13, 6817 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Nie, B. et al. Systematic analysis of cuproptosis-related genes in immunological characterization and predictive drugs in Alzheimer’s disease. Front. Aging Neurosci. 15, 1204530 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Li, J. et al. Identification of diagnostic genes for both Alzheimer’s disease and Metabolic syndrome by the machine learning algorithm. Front. Immunol. 13, 1037318 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Zhang, Y. et al. Identification of mitochondrial related signature associated with immune microenvironment in Alzheimer’s disease. J. Transl. Med. 21, 458 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Guo, W. et al. Exploring the interaction between T-cell antigen receptor-related genes and MAPT or ACHE using integrated bioinformatics analysis. Front. Neurol. 14, 1129470 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Ma, C. et al. Identification and prediction of m7G-related Alzheimer’s disease subtypes: insights from immune infiltration and machine learning models. Front. Aging Neurosci. 15, 1161068 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Wang, R. et al. Identification of immunogenic cell death-related genes involved in Alzheimer’s disease. Sci. Rep. 14, 3786 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Xiong, F. et al. Identification of chromatin regulatory factors related to immunity and treatment of Alzheimer’s Disease. J. Mol. Neurosci. 73, 85–94 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Croisile, B., Auriacombe, S., Etcharry-Bouyx, F. & Vercelletto, M. [The new 2011 recommendations of the National Institute on Aging and the Alzheimer’s Association on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease: preclinical stages, mild cognitive impairment, and dementia]. Rev. Neurol. 168, 471–482 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Petersen, R. C. Mild cognitive impairment as a diagnostic entity. J. Intern. Med. 256, 183–194 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82373781), Jiangsu Provincial Medical Key Discipline (Laboratory) Cultivation Unit (JSDW202240), the Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Critical Care Medicine (JSKLCCM202202015), Southeast University Doctoral Students Innovation Ability Enhancement Program (CXJH_SEU_24219), Zhongda Hospital Affiliated to Southeast University, Jiangsu Province High-Level Hospital Pairing Assistance Construction Funds (zdlyg09) and Health Research project of Health Commission of Jiangsu Province (BJ23014).

Author information

Author notes
  1. These authors contributed equally: Shuo Ma, Dawen Chen.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Zhongda Hospital, Medical School of Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China

    Shuo Ma, Dawen Chen, Meiling Zhou, Jiwei Wang, Yuming Yao & Guoqiu Wu

  2. Department of Laboratory Medicine, Medical School of Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China

    Shuo Ma, Dawen Chen, Meiling Zhou, Jiwei Wang, Yuming Yao & Guoqiu Wu

  3. Department of Geriatrics, Zhongda Hospital, Medical School of Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China

    Yanzhi Li

  4. Center of Neurology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany

    Yanxia Liu

  5. Department of Integrated Oncology, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany

    Yinhao Chen

  6. Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Critical Care Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China

    Guoqiu Wu

Authors
  1. Shuo Ma
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dawen Chen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yanzhi Li
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yanxia Liu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Meiling Zhou
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jiwei Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Yuming Yao
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Yinhao Chen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Guoqiu Wu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conception or design: S.M., D.W.C., Y.H.C., G.Q.W. Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: S.M., D.W.C., Y.H.C., G.Q.W. Sample collection and data processing: Y.Z.L., M.L.Z., J.W.W., Y.M.Y., Y.X.L. Drafting the work or revising: S.M., Y.H.C. Final approval of the manuscript: all authors.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yinhao Chen or Guoqiu Wu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary document

Supplementary Data 1

Supplementary Data 2

Supplementary Data 3

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ma, S., Chen, D., Li, Y. et al. A machine learning–enabled blood transcriptomic signature for digital diagnosis and subtyping of Alzheimer’s disease. npj Digit. Med. (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-02305-7

Download citation

  • Received: 23 October 2025

  • Accepted: 18 December 2025

  • Published: 05 January 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-02305-7

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Associated content

Collection

Emerging Applications of Machine Learning and AI for Predictive Modeling in Precision Medicine

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims and scope
  • Content types
  • Journal Information
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Calls for Papers
  • Journal Metrics
  • About the Partner
  • Open Access
  • Early Career Researcher Editorial Fellowship
  • Editorial Team Vacancies
  • News and Views Student Editor
  • Communication Fellowship

Publish with us

  • For Authors and Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

npj Digital Medicine (npj Digit. Med.)

ISSN 2398-6352 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing: Translational Research

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Translational Research newsletter — top stories in biotechnology, drug discovery and pharma.

Get what matters in translational research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Translational Research