Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Clinical outcomes of a genomic newborn screening study in Qingdao, China

Abstract

Genomic sequencing can identify nucleotide changes for underlying monogenic disorders, making it a promising newborn screening method for enabling early intervention and reducing false positives. Here, in this prospective study, we enrolled 9,992 newborns from the West Coast New District of Qingdao, China, within 3 days after birth; positive cases were followed until 31 March 2025 to assess the effectiveness of whole-genome sequencing (WGS) in neonatal screening. Among 9,992 newborns screened by WGS, 268 (2.7%) were positive. By the date of follow-up, 19 were clinically confirmed (11 hearing loss, 3 glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency, 2 Wilson disease, 2 phenylketonuria and 1 methylmalonic aciduria), of which 8 were missed by traditional screening. Among 19 symptomatic infants who underwent reanalysis, 8 (42.1%) were diagnosed with potentially pathogenic or pathogenic variants associated with the phenotype. Our findings indicate that integrating WGS into routine newborn screening could substantially improve early detection of monogenic diseases and enhance clinical outcomes in China.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Flowchart of the QDnewborn cohort.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 2: Whole-genome screening results.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 3: Comparison between the findings of WGS and NBS.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 4: Altered metabolites in lipid biosynthesis pathways associated with dyslipidaemia-related gene mutations.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Data availability

The data that support the finding of this study, including the allele frequency of the newborns at all the 95.86 million genetic variants, have been deposited in the Genome Variation Map 68 (https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/gvm/) at the National Genomics Data Center, China National Center for Bioinformation/Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, under accession number GVM000685. The dataset is publicly accessible at http://bigd.big.ac.cn/gvm/getProjectDetail?project=GVM000685. The release of the data was approved by the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (project ID: 2024SQXB001172). To protect the genetic privacy of individual participants, the raw sequencing data and participant information are not publicly available. Sequencing data will be made available for collaborating researchers upon request, subject to approval by the Human Genetic Resources Administration of China (HGRAC). The approval process typically takes approximately 3–4 months from the date of submission to HGRAC. For data access requests, please contact the corresponding author S.P. (silinpan@126.com, Qingdao Women and Children’s Hospital).

Code availability

The code for the study is publicly available via GitHub at https://github.com/Dula2026/Analysis-pipline.

References

  1. Therrell, B. L. et al. Current status of newborn screening worldwide: 2015. Semin. Perinatol. 39, 171–187 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. van Spronsen, F. J. et al. Phenylketonuria. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 7, 36 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Chace, D. H., Kalas, T. A. & Naylor, E. W. The application of tandem mass spectrometry to neonatal screening for inherited disorders of intermediary metabolism. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 3, 17–45 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kwon, C. & Farrell, P. M. The magnitude and challenge of false-positive newborn screening test results. Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc. Med. 154, 714–718 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Adhikari, A. N. et al. The role of exome sequencing in newborn screening for inborn errors of metabolism. Nat. Med. 26, 1392–1397 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen, T. et al. Genomic sequencing as a first-tier screening test and outcomes of newborn screening. JAMA Netw. Open 6, e2331162 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Biesecker, L. G. & Green, R. C. Diagnostic clinical genome and exome sequencing. New Engl. J. Med. 370, 2418–2425 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Yang, R.-L. et al. A multicenter prospective study of next-generation sequencing-based newborn screening for monogenic genetic diseases in China. World J. Pediatr. 19, 663–673 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhou, Y. et al. Genetic identification of familial hypercholesterolemia within whole genome sequences in 6820 newborns. Clin. Genet. 105, 308–312 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chien, Y.-H. & Hwu, W.-L. The modern face of newborn screening. Pediatr. Neonatol. 64, S22–S29 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ziegler, A. et al. Expanded newborn screening using genome sequencing for early actionable conditions. JAMA 333, 232–240 (2025).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Ceyhan-Birsoy, O. et al. Interpretation of genomic sequencing results in healthy and ill newborns: results from the BabySeq project. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 104, 76–93 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Green, R. C. et al. Actionability of unanticipated monogenic disease risks in newborn genomic screening: findings from the BabySeq Project. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 110, 1034–1045 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen, Y. et al. Biallelic p.V37I variant in GJB2 is associated with increasing incidence of hearing loss with age. Genet. Med. 24, 915–923 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Yu, X. et al. Molecular epidemiology of Chinese Han deaf patients with bi-allelic and mono-allelic GJB2 mutations. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 15, 29 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Chaker, L. et al. Hypothyroidism. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 8, 30 (2022).

  17. White, P. C., Vitek, A., Dupont, B. & New, M. I. Characterization of frequent deletions causing steroid 21-hydroxylase deficiency. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 85, 4436–4440 (1988).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Jian, M. et al. A pilot study of assessing whole genome sequencing in newborn screening in unselected children in China. Clin. Transl. Med. 12, e843 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang, Q. et al. Nationwide population genetic screening improves outcomes of newborn screening for hearing loss in China. Genet. Med. 21, 2231–2238 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Andermann, A., Blancquaert, I., Beauchamp, S. & Déry, V. Revisiting Wilson and Jungner in the genomic age: a review of screening criteria over the past 40 years. Bull. World Health Org. 86, 317–319 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Hamosh, A. et al. Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM), a knowledgebase of human genes and genetic disorders. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, 52–55 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Milko, L. V. et al. An age-based framework for evaluating genome-scale sequencing results in newborn screening. J. Pediatr. 209, 68–76 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Ceyhan-Birsoy, O. et al. A curated gene list for reporting results of newborn genomic sequencing. Genet. Med. 19, 809–818 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Drmanac, R. et al. Human genome sequencing using unchained base reads on self-assembling DNA nanoarrays. Science 327, 78–81 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Huang, J. et al. A reference human genome dataset of the BGISEQ-500 sequencer. GigaScience 6, 1–9 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Chen, Y. et al. SOAPnuke: a MapReduce acceleration-supported software for integrated quality control and preprocessing of high-throughput sequencing data. GigaScience 7, gix120 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Li, H. & Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows–Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25, 1754–1760 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. McKenna, A. et al. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 20, 1297–1303 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Richards, S. et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet. Med. 17, 405–423 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Lee, L. C., Liong, C.-Y. & Jemain, A. A. Partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) for classification of high-dimensional (HD) data: a review of contemporary practice strategies and knowledge gaps. Analyst 143, 3526–3539 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Wishart, D. S. et al. HMDB 5.0: the Human Metabolome Database for 2022. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, D622–D631 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all the participants and clinicians for their involvement in this study. We thank the guidance and technical support of the China Baby Omics project.

Funding

This study was supported by the research grant from the subproject of the National Key R&D Program (grant no. 2023YFC2705600), National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 82192864), the Shanghai Municipal Commission of Science and Technology Program (grant no. 23ZR1408000) and the Shanghai Municipal Commission of Health and Family Planning (grant no. 2024ZZ2017).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Concept and design: S.P., L.Z., Y. Du, J.L. and X.J. Acquisition, analysis or interpretation of data: S.C., H.H., Y.C., P.D., X. Wang, J. Zhang, X.C., Q.F., J. Zhao, D.C., Y.S., Y.Z., J.S., R.C., L.Y., Y. Duan, L.L., M.F., G.Z., Y.H., N.L., Z.S., B.D., M.W., X. Wei, S.W., K.Y., D.L., D.M., L.C. and J.X. Drafting of the paper: P.D., Y.C. and S.C. Critical review of the paper for important intellectual content: H.H., J. Zhang, L.S., Z.P., Y.G., H.P., L.Z., Yutao D., J.L., X.J., C.X. and S.P. Statistical analysis: S.C., H.H., Y.C., P.D. and X. Wang. Administrative, technical or material support: S.P., L.Z., Y. Du, F.C., S.L., H.L., K.Y., D.L., D.M., L.C. and J.X. Supervision: H.H., Y.G., X.J., J.L., Y. Du, L.Z. and S.P.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yutao Du, Chenming Xu, Lijian Zhao or Silin Pan.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Health thanks Richard Choy, Jun Liao and Kwong Wai for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editor: Manonmani Soundararajan, in collaboration with the Nature Health team. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Statistical analysis of Qingdao newborn cohort.

(a) The average sequencing depth and coverage (1x, 10x, 20x). (b) The number of autosomal SNPs and INDELs identified.

Extended Data Fig. 2 Sanger traces for PCR products of the patient and his parents.

(a) Sanger sequencing chromatograms show that patient 1 carries the heterozygous c.323 T > C variant. The parents do not carry the variant. (b) Sanger sequencing chromatograms show that patient 2 carries the heterozygous c.573dupA variant. The parents do not carry the variant.

Source Data

Extended Data Fig. 3 Metabolite analysis.

(a) PLS-DA of the amino acid metabolic disease-related mutations vs deafness-related mutations. (b) PLS-DA of dyslipidemia-related mutations vs deafness-related mutations. (c) Volcano plot showing differential metabolites between amino acid metabolic disease-related mutations and deafness-related mutations. (d) KEGG pathway enrichment analysis for amino acid metabolic disease-related mutations vs deafness-related mutations. (e) Volcano plot showing differential metabolites between dyslipidemia-related mutations and deafness-related mutations. (f) KEGG pathway enrichment analysis for dyslipidemia-related mutations vs deafness-related mutations.

Extended Data Fig. 4

Annotation process of WGS data during post- test consultation.

Source Data

Extended Data Table 1 Comparison of published panel-based large studies evaluating sequencing NBS in China
Extended Data Table 2 Mandatory screening positives for hearing impairment by OAEs or AABR
Extended Data Table 3 Comparison of G6PD deficiency and phenylketonuria by WGS screening and traditional screening

Supplementary information

Reporting Summary (download PDF )

Peer Review File (download PDF )

Supplementary Tables 1–11 (download XLSX )

Supplementary Table 1: Comparison of the cost, turnaround time and gene contents between biochemical NBS and WGS. Supplementary Table 2: Positive results identified in suspected patients. Supplementary Table 3: Newborn numbers screened by WGS. Supplementary Table 4: Summary of 160 asymptomatic infants. Supplementary Table 5: Overview of abnormal newborns returned for post-hoc WGS consultation. Supplementary Table 6: A list of the 1,321 metabolites detected in this study. Supplementary Table 7: The 222 inherited diseases and 214 related genes screened by WGS. Supplementary Table 8: P/LP variants identified in the QDnewborn cohort. Supplementary Table 9: The 20 variants of 4 genes for hearing loss screened by MALDI-TOF-MS. Supplementary Table 10: The 48 inherited metabolic diseases screened by MS/MS. Supplementary Table 11: List of samples and diseases used for untargeted blood spot metabolomics.

Source data

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, S., Huang, H., Chen, Y. et al. Clinical outcomes of a genomic newborn screening study in Qingdao, China. Nat. Health (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44360-026-00147-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44360-026-00147-5

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing: Translational Research

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Translational Research newsletter — top stories in biotechnology, drug discovery and pharma.

Get what matters in translational research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Translational Research