Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Ingestible optoelectronic capsules enable bidirectional communication with engineered microbes for controllable therapeutic interventions

Abstract

Engineered microbes can be used for biomolecular sensing and therapeutic interventions. However, they cannot be monitored and controlled while in vivo. Here we combine optogenetically engineered Escherichia coli Nissle 1917, an ingestible optoelectronic capsule and a wireless smartphone to establish a bidirectional biological–optical–electronic signal processing chain for diagnostic or therapeutic capabilities under user control. As a proof of concept, we engineered E. coli Nissle 1917 to detect inflammation-associated nitric oxide in the pig gut and generate a bioluminescent signal for diagnosis of colitis. This signal is transduced by the optoelectronic capsule into a wireless electrical signal and remotely monitored by a smartphone. Smartphone wireless signals activate LED irradiation in the optoelectronic capsule, in turn activating the microbial expression and secretion of an anti-inflammatory nanobody to alleviate colitis in pigs. This approach highlights the potential for integrating synthetic biology and optoelectronics for digital health monitoring and controllable intervention.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Monitoring of EcN bioluminescence via optoelectronic capsule.
Fig. 2: Monitoring of microbial sensor via optoelectronic capsule.
Fig. 3: Activation of microbial function via optoelectronic capsule.
Fig. 4: Control of microbes for colitis monitoring and intervention.
Fig. 5: Simulated closed-loop bidirectional signal processing cycle.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Source data are provided with this paper. These data are also available via figshare at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29207006.v1 (ref. 50).

References

  1. Riglar, D. T. & Silver, P. A. Engineering bacteria for diagnostic and therapeutic applications. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 16, 214–225 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. McNerney, M. P., Doiron, K. E., Ng, T. L., Chang, T. Z. & Silver, P. A. Theranostic cells: emerging clinical applications of synthetic biology. Nat. Rev. Genet. 22, 730–746 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Archer, E. J., Robinson, A. B. & Süel, G. M. Engineered E. coli that detect and respond to gut inflammation through nitric oxide sensing. ACS Synth. Biol. 1, 451–457 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Daeffler, K. N. et al. Engineering bacterial thiosulfate and tetrathionate sensors for detecting gut inflammation. Mol. Syst. Biol. 13, 923 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Scott, B. M. et al. Self-tunable engineered yeast probiotics for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. Nat. Med. 27, 1212–1222 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lubkowicz, D. et al. Reprogramming probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri as a biosensor for Staphylococcus aureus derived AIP-I detection. ACS Synth. Biol. 7, 1229–1237 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mao, N., Cubillos-Ruiz, A., Cameron, D. E. & Collins, J. J. Probiotic strains detect and suppress cholera in mice. Sci. Transl. Med. 10, eaao2586 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Zou, Z. P., Du, Y., Fang, T. T., Zhou, Y. & Ye, B. C. Biomarker-responsive engineered probiotic diagnoses, records, and ameliorates inflammatory bowel disease in mice. Cell Host Microbe 31, 199–212 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Canale, F. P. et al. Metabolic modulation of tumours with engineered bacteria for immunotherapy. Nature 598, 662–666 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gurbatri, C. R., Arpaia, N. & Danino, T. Engineering bacteria as interactive cancer therapies. Science 378, 858–864 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Sun, D. et al. Utilizing engineered bacteria as ‘cell factories’ in vivo for intracellular RNA-loaded outer membrane vesicles’ self-assembly in tumor treatment. ACS Nano 18, 35296–35309 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Vockley, J. et al. Efficacy and safety of a synthetic biotic for treatment of phenylketonuria: a phase 2 clinical trial. Nat. Metab. 5, 1685–1690 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Puurunen, M. K. et al. Safety and pharmacodynamics of an engineered E. coli Nissle for the treatment of phenylketonuria: a first-in-human phase 1/2a study. Nat. Metab. 3, 1125–1132 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kurtz, C. B. et al. An engineered E. coli Nissle improves hyperammonemia and survival in mice and shows dose-dependent exposure in healthy humans. Sci. Transl. Med. 11, eaau7975 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hwang, I. Y. et al. Engineered probiotic Escherichia coli can eliminate and prevent Pseudomonas aeruginosa gut infection in animal models. Nat. Commun. 8, 15028 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Barger, N., Oren, I., Li, X., Hadib, M. & Daniel, R. A whole-cell bacterial biosensor for blood markers detection in urine. ACS Synth. Biol. 10, 1132–1142 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cui, M. et al. NIR light-responsive bacteria with live bio-glue coatings for precise colonization in the gut. Cell Rep. 36, 109690 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang, X. et al. A red light-controlled probiotic bio-system for in-situ gut-brain axis regulation. Biomaterials 294, 122005 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cui, M. et al. Smartphone bioelectronic drug with visual colorimetric sensor and bulk nanoencapsulation optogenetic bacteria for chronic kidney disease theragnostics. Chem. Eng. J. 451, 138812 (2023).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Martínez, E. P. & Robles, E. P. Capsule endoscopy and deep enteroscopy. Endoscopy 46, 787–790 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ding, Z. et al. Novel scheme for non-invasive gut bioinformation acquisition with a magnetically controlled sampling capsule endoscope. Gut 70, 2297–2306 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. You, S. S. et al. An ingestible device for gastric electrophysiology. Nature 7, 497–508 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hou, B. et al. A swallowable X-ray dosimeter for the real-time monitoring of radiotherapy. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 7, 1242–1251 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ramadi, K. B. et al. Bioinspired, ingestible electroceutical capsules for hunger-regulating hormone modulation. Sci. Robot. 8, eade9676 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Srinivasan, S. S. et al. RoboCap: robotic mucus-clearing capsule for enhanced drug delivery in the gastrointestinal tract. Sci. Robot. 7, eabp9066 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. De la Paz, E. et al. A self-powered ingestible wireless biosensing system for real-time in situ monitoring of gastrointestinal tract metabolites. Nat. Commun. 13, 7405 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Shi, J. et al. Active biointegrated living electronics for managing inflammation. Science 384, 1023–1030 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Deng, J. et al. Electrical bioadhesive interface for bioelectronics. Nat. Mater. 20, 229–236 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Mimee, M. et al. An ingestible bacterial-electronic system to monitor gastrointestinal health. Science 360, 915–918 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Inda-Webb, M. E. et al. Sub-1.4 cm3 capsule for detecting labile inflammatory biomarkers in situ. Nature 620, 386–392 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ausländer, S. & Fussenegger, M. Synthetic biology: toehold gene switches make big footprints. Nature 516, 333–334 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Bernard, P. & Couturier, M. Cell killing by the F plasmid CcdB protein involves poisoning of DNA-topoisomerase II complexes. J. Mol. Biol. 226, 735–745 (1992).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ong, N. T. & Tabor, J. J. A miniaturized Escherichia coli green light sensor with high dynamic range. ChemBioChem 19, 1255–1258 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Hartsough, L. A. et al. Optogenetic control of gut bacterial metabolism to promote longevity. Elife 9, e56849 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. An, B. et al. Programming living glue systems to perform autonomous mechanical repairs. Matter 3, 2080–2092 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Lynch, J. P. et al. Engineered Escherichia coli for the in situ secretion of therapeutic nanobodies in the gut. Cell Host Microbe 31, 634–649 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Cosnes, J. et al. Adalimumab or infliximab as monotherapy, or in combination with an immunomodulator, in the treatment of Crohn’s disease. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 44, 1102–1113 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Holland, I. et al. Type I protein secretion-deceptively simple yet with a wide range of mechanistic variability across the family. EcoSal Plus https://doi.org/10.1128/ecosalplus.ESP-0019-2015 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Yang, C. & Merlin, D. Unveiling colitis: a journey through the dextran sodium sulfate-induced model. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 30, 844–853 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Saco, Y. & Bassols, A. Acute phase proteins in cattle and swine: a review. Vet. Clin. Pathol. 52, 50–63 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Waka, M. et al. Serum amyloid A is a better predictive biomarker of mucosal healing than C-reactive protein in ulcerative colitis in clinical remission. BMC Gastroenterol. 20, 85 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Cui, M. et al. Optotheranostic nanosystem with phone visual diagnosis and optogenetic microbial therapy for ulcerative colitis at-home care. ACS Nano 15, 7040–7052 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Cooper, R. M. et al. Engineered bacteria detect tumor DNA. Science 381, 682–686 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Fan, C., He, N. & Yuan, J. Cascaded amplifying circuit enables sensitive detection of fungal pathogens. Biosens. Bioelectron. 250, 116058 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Gurbatri, C. R. et al. Engineering tumor-colonizing E. coli Nissle 1917 for detection and treatment of colorectal neoplasia. Nat. Commun. 15, 646 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Centurion, F. et al. Nanoencapsulation for probiotic delivery. ACS Nano 15, 18653–18660 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Rebeck, O. N. et al. A yeast-based oral therapeutic delivers immune checkpoint inhibitors to reduce intestinal tumor burden. Cell Chem. Biol. 32, 98–110.e7 (2025).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Cheng, A. G. et al. Design, construction, and in vivo augmentation of a complex gut microbiome. Cell 185, 3617–3636.e19 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Abdigazy, A. et al. End-to-end design of ingestible electronics. Nat. Electron. 7, 102–118 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Wang, H. Source data of research Ingestible optoelectronic capsules enable bidirectional communication with engineered microbes for controllable therapeutic interventions. figshare https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29207006.v1 (2025).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Laboratory Center of the School of Life Sciences (Tianjin University) and Experimental Animal Center of Northwest Agriculture and Forestry University for facility support. We thank C. Yang and X. Ma from Beijing Institute of Technology for assisting EcN genomic manipulation including gene knockout and integration. We also thank H. Yi, Z. Wang, W. Guo and Z. Jiang of the School of Life Sciences, Longyan University, and X. Sun and Y. Wei of the College of Veterinary, Northwest Agriculture and Forestry University, for their help in the animal experiments. This work is supported by the following fundings: National Key Research and Development Program of China (2021YFA0909300, D.L.), National Natural Science Foundation of China for Excellent Young Scholars (32122047, Hanjie Wang), Tianjin Natural Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars (23JCJQJC00210, Hanjie Wang), Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Basic Research Cooperation Project of Beijing Natural Science Foundation (23JCZXJC00370, Hanjie Wang) and Key Program of Tianjin Natural Science Foundation (22JCZDJC00230, Hanjie Wang).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Hanjie Wang, D.L. and T.D. developed the key concept of this work and guided the whole research process. Z.F. designed and assembled the electronic capsules. X.Z., D.L. and J.L. designed the plasmids and strains. X.Z., Z.F., H.L., L.L., C.Z., H.X., Y.W., D.S., X.L., M.L., S.L. and J.L. constructed the plasmids and strains and performed in vitro synthetic biological experiments. X.Z. and H.L. designed and performed in vivo mouse experiments. X.Z., H.Y., P.D., T.D. and Hanjie Wang conceptualized and designed the ex vivo and in vivo pig experiments. X.Z., Z.F., H.Y., H.L., L.L., P.D., C.Z. and Hanxin Wang performed ex vivo and in vivo pig experiments. Z.F. and H.L. did the intestinal visualization experiments. X.Z., D.L. and Hanjie Wang wrote the paper.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Taofeng Du, Duo Liu or Hanjie Wang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Microbiology thanks David Carreño and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Citation diversity statement

The authors have taken local and regional research relevant to this study into account in citations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Illustration of monitoring and control of intestinal engineered microbes via optoelectronic capsules.

The optoelectronic capsule and the optogenetically engineered microbes are designed to establish the bidirectional signal processing chain. One direction from microbes to the optoelectronic capsule and the ex vivo smartphone is for monitoring microbial status through bioluminescent signals generated by engineered microbes in response to specific biomarkers. Another direction from the APP-controlled optoelectronic capsule to microbes is for activating the expression and secretion of therapeutic proteins. When applied in vivo, the whole process can be used for in-situ diagnose and intervention of intestinal disease. Figure created with BioRender.com.

Extended Data Fig. 2 Basic properties of the optoelectronic capsule used in this study.

(a) The composition and the whole size of optoelectronic capsule. (b) The user interface of the APP on smartphone for recording photocurrent signal. (c) The irradiating characterization of LED loaded in the optoelectronic capsule during 36 h. (d) The processing of raw photocurrent data through a sliding average filtering algorithm for smooth output when the optoelectronic capsule was placed under different conditions of luminescence Source data.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 3 Monitoring of EcN-Lux in pig’s daily feed via optoelectronic capsule.

(a) Scheme of photocurrent measurement at particular time intervals after pig’s oral administration of EcN-Lux. (b) Mixing of the engineered EcN into daily feed for pig administration. (c) X-ray photos of the process of placing the optoelectronic capsule inside pig rectum to the 35 cm depth from anus with the assistance of a moderately soft pipeline. (d) Measurement of the photocurrents derived from EcN-Lux at 16 h interval after the strains were orally administrated Source data. Panels a and d created with BioRender.com.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 4 Simulation experiments to test bioluminescence of EcN-NO-Lux.

(a) Scheme of monitoring the bioluminescence of EcN-NO-Lux when sensing NO/nitrate. (b) Imaging of EcN-NO-Lux in mice model within 4 hours after the administration of strains and nitrate. (c) Recording of photocurrents for monitoring the microbial dynamic sensing of nitrate within 2 h. (d), (f) The in vitro simulation experiment to mimic in vivo intestinal conditions without or with feeds. (e), (g) Detection of EcN-NO-Lux performance in within 24 h in the intestinal simulation conditions in (d) or (f) using four different methods. (h) Monitoring of the nitrate biosensing via the optoelectronic capsule while passing through an intestinal tissue segment containing evenly distributed EcN-NO-Lux. (i) Imaging of the real pig intestinal section in (h). The capsule was pulled from the ‘Start’ point to the ‘End’ point slowly to simulate the peristalsis in the gut. (j) Changes of photocurrents along with the optoelectronic capsule passing through the intestinal section. All the measurements in the above experiments were taken from distinct biological replicates. Data are presented as the mean ± SD. n = 3. Significance was determined by two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post-test for (e) and (g). The significance labelled as ‘ns’ meant p > 0.05 Source data. Panel b created with BioRender.com.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 5 Simulation experiments to test bioluminescence of EcN-Ara-Lux.

(a) Schematic diagram of the arabinose-sensing genetic circuit. (b) Measurement of the bioluminescence densities of EcN-Ara-Lux when sensing different arabinose concentrations. (c) Measurement of the bioluminescence changes of EcN-Ara-Lux when sensing 10 mM arabinose within 4 h. (d) Imaging of EcN-Ara-Lux in mice model within 4 hours after the administration of strains and arabinose. (e), (f) Photocurrent measurement from the EcN-Ara-Lux when responding to different concentrations of arabinose. (g) Monitoring of arabinose distribution via the optoelectronic capsule while passing through an intestinal tissue segment containing evenly distributed EcN-Ara-Lux. (h) Imaging of the real pig intestinal section in (g). The capsule was pulled from the ‘Start’ point to the ‘End’ point slowly. (i) Changes of photocurrents along with the optoelectronic capsule passing through the intestinal section. (j) Schematic diagram of monitoring the arabinose-sensing EcN via optoelectronic capsule in the surgery-exposed pig colon sections. (k), (l) Comparison of the photocurrents measured from the EcN-Ara-Lux when adding arabinose or not. All the measurements in the above experiments were taken from distinct biological replicates. Data are presented as the mean ± SD. n = 3. Significance was determined by two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post-test for (l) Source data. Panel j created with BioRender.com.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 6 Characterization of EcN equipped with CcaS-CcaR optogenetic circuit.

(a) Construction of the CcaS-CcaR two-component optogenetic circuit in EcN. (b) The activation of GFP expression after 2 h irradiation of green light on the EcN tubes. (c) Comparison of activated GFP expression in different strains, 1: EcN-MUT1-GFP; 2: EcN-MUT2-GFP; 3: EcN-SC101-GFP; 4: EcN-RSF-GFP; 5: EcN-Ara-GFP (after 8 hours of 0.2% arabinose induction); 6: EcN-Opto-GFP (after 8 hours of green light induction). (d) Test of the effect of ON-OFF switch after 1 h green-light irradiation on the EcN-Opto-GFP performance. (e) Comparison of the luminescence changes of EcN-Opto-GFP luciferase under different conditions. (f) Imaging of EcN-Opto-Lux in mice model irradiated by LED array loaded on the cage within 4 hours. (g), (h) Imaging and measurement of luciferase expression activated by the green light of capsule-LED at a distance from 0 to 70 mm. All the measurements were taken on the same mouse at different time points. All the measurements in the above experiments were taken from distinct biological replicates. Data are presented as the mean ± SD. n = 3.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 7 Characterization of optoelectronic capsule orally administrated by live pig.

(a) Remote control of LED equipped in the optoelectronic capsule in vivo by APP (left) and the LED switch images under colonoscopy (right). (b) X-ray imaging of placing the electronic capsule into the esophagus via a gastric catheter. (c) X-ray imaging of the optoelectronic capsule in live pig at different hours after administration. (d) Confirmation of the connectivity of optoelectronic capsule in the whole period in pig gastrointestinal tract. (e) X-ray imaging of the optoelectronic capsule at three different positions in live pig. (f) The Bluetooth signal intensities of the optoelectronic capsule in vivo fluctuated at different positions. All the measurements in the above experiments were taken from distinct biological replicates. Data are presented as the mean ± SD. n = 3 Source data. Panels a and d created with BioRender.com.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 8 Biosafety accessing of optoelectronic capsule.

(a) Detection of extra heat generated from optoelectronic capsule with LED switching on and off when placed in an incubator mimicking body temperature. (b) Scheme of biosafety accessing of optoelectronic capsule in pig body. Several blood indicators were detected before and after the two rounds of capsule ingestion for 4 days each round. (c) Comparison of pathological images of the pigs taking optoelectronic capsule or not. Sclar Bar=200μm. (d)–(g) Detection of the levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), hemoglobin (HGB), leukocyte, and platelet before and after the ingestion of optoelectronic capsule. The relatively normal parameter value range was shown in each figure by dashed line. All the measurements in the above experiments were taken from distinct biological replicates. Data are presented as the mean ± SD. n = 3. Significance was determined according to unpaired, two-tailed student’s t-test for (a). The significance labelled as ‘ns’ meant p > 0.05 Source data. Panel b created with BioRender.com.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 9 Supplemented characterization of diagnosis and alleviation of colitis.

(a)–(d) Detection of photocurrent value by the capsule, serum CRP, SAA and fecal CalP on Day 4. (e)–(h) Detection of photocurrent value by the capsule, serum CRP, SAA and fecal CalP on Day 5. (i) Detection of EcN-NO-Lux density changes based on the quantification of LuxA DNA copies at Day 3, 4 and 5. (j) Detection of EcN-NO-Lux density changes based on the quantification of Nb-TNF DNA copies at Day 6, 10 and 14. All the measurements in the above experiments were taken from distinct biological replicates. Data are presented as the mean ± SD. n = 3. Significance was determined by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post-test. The significance labelled as ‘ns’ meant p > 0.05.

Source data

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (download PDF )

Supplementary Figs. 1–9.

Reporting Summary (download PDF )

Peer Review File (download PDF )

Supplementary Video 1 (download MP4 )

Remote control of electronic capsule-loaded LED in the intestine. To visualize the remote control of the electronic capsule in vivo and examine its functionality, we placed the capsule into pig’s rectum trans-anally at ~30 cm depth, repeatedly turned on and off the capsule-loaded LED under remote Bluetooth control on the smartphone APP and recorded the LED status via colonoscopy.

Supplementary Video 2 (download MP4 )

The simulated process of administering the electronic capsules into the pig’s oesophagus. The process of placing electronic capsules into the oesophagus of pigs was demonstrated through the simulation video. Using glycerol for lubrication, we inserted a soft catheter with an electronic capsule at one end into the pig’s oesophagus to a depth of ~40 cm and then used a guide rod to push the capsule deep into the oesophagus.

Supplementary Video 3 (download MP4 )

The wireless connectable time range when the electronic capsule was in the intestine of pigs. When the electronic capsule was at its position as shown in the right panel of Extended Data Fig. 7c (96 h after oral administration), the available range of the location of user’s smartphone to maintain Bluetooth connectivity was recorded.

Supplementary Tables (download XLSX )

Supplementary Tables 1–4 in an integrated Excel file.

Supplementary Data 1 (download XLSX )

Source data of all the supplementary figures in the form of Excel table.

Source data

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, X., Feng, Z., Li, H. et al. Ingestible optoelectronic capsules enable bidirectional communication with engineered microbes for controllable therapeutic interventions. Nat Microbiol 10, 1841–1853 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-025-02057-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-025-02057-w

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing