Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Ecological and demographic drivers of Oropouche virus transmission

Abstract

Oropouche virus (OROV) is a neglected arbovirus that has caused outbreaks in Central and South America since the 1950s. Here we investigate the ecological and demographic determinants of Oropouche fever in Brazil between 2014 and 2025. During this period, 30,086 laboratory-confirmed Oropouche fever cases were reported across 894 (16.1%) of 5,570 municipalities in all 26 states and the Federal District. Of the confirmed cases, 14,651 (48.7%) were female and 15,422 (51.3%) were male. The cumulative incidence of Oropouche fever cases in rural municipalities was 11.3 times higher than in urban municipalities between 2014 and 2025. OROV exhibited a median urban-to-rural case ratio of 0.6, while dengue, chikungunya and Zika ratios range from 2.5 to 2.8. OROV transmission fluctuated in the North Region before its 2024 geographic expansion, with transmission peaks (Rt) ranging from 3.2 to 5.5. Our risk maps revealed significant heterogeneity in OROV risk across Brazil, driven by the interactions among demographic, climatic and environmental conditions. Our findings provide a comprehensive assessment of the ecological and demographic characteristics of Oropouche fever in Brazil and improve the understanding of its transmission dynamics.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Spatiotemporal dynamics of Oropouche fever cases in Brazil from 2014 to 2025.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 2: Demographic characteristics of Oropouche fever cases in Brazil from 2014 to 2025.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 3: Population distribution of Oropouche fever cases in Brazil from 2014 to 2025.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 4: Transmission dynamics of Oropouche fever cases in Brazil from 2014 to 2025.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 5: Municipality-level risk maps of OROV outbreaks in Brazil following an OROV case introduction, based on monthly climate normals.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data used to generate the figures in this paper are publicly available on GitHub (https://github.com/wmarciel/Oropouche_Ecology). Deidentified individual-level data from the Brazilian Ministry of Health can be provided for research purposes after approval by a committee on human experimentation (if applicable). This data can be obtained upon request to W.M.d.S. (wmdesouza@uky.edu). The estimated response time may be up to 3 weeks.

Code availability

All codes used to generate the figures in this paper are publicly available on GitHub (https://github.com/wmarciel/Oropouche_Ecology). No custom code was developed in the study.

References

  1. Travassos da Rosa, J. F. et al. Oropouche virus: clinical, epidemiological, and molecular aspects of a neglected orthobunyavirus. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 96, 1019–1030 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. de Souza, W. M. et al. ICTV virus taxonomy profile: Peribunyaviridae 2024. J. Gen. Virol. 105, 002034 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. das Neves Martins, F. E. et al. Newborns with microcephaly in Brazil and potential vertical transmission of Oropouche virus: a case series. Lancet Infect. Dis. 25, 155–165 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bandeira, A. C. et al. Fatal Oropouche virus infections in nonendemic region, Brazil, 2024. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 30, 2370–2374 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. de Lima, S. T. S. et al. Molecular epidemiology of Oropouche virus, Ceará State, Brazil, 2024. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 31, 838–842 (2025).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Scachetti, G. C. et al. Re-emergence of Oropouche virus between 2023 and 2024 in Brazil: an observational epidemiological study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 25, 166–175 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Naveca, F. G. et al. Human outbreaks of a novel reassortant Oropouche virus in the Brazilian Amazon region. Nat. Med. 30, 3509–3521 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Srivastava, S. et al. The emergence of Oropouche fever: a potential new threat? New Microbes New Infect. 65, 101596 (2025).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Capobianchi, M. R., Castilletti, C. & Gobbi, F. G. Potential risks of Oropouche virus importation into Europe. J. Travel Med. 31, taae109 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Morrison, A. et al. Oropouche virus disease among U.S. travelers – United States, 2024. MMWR Morb. Mortal Wkly Rep. 73, 769–773 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Gräf, T. et al. Expansion of Oropouche virus in non-endemic Brazilian regions: analysis of genomic characterisation and ecological drivers. Lancet Infect. Dis. 25, 379–389 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lim, A. et al. The overlapping global distribution of dengue, chikungunya, Zika and yellow fever. Nat. Commun. 16, 3418 (2025).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Feitoza, L. H. M. et al. Influence of meteorological and seasonal parameters on the activity of Culicoides paraensis (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae), an annoying anthropophilic biting midge and putative vector of Oropouche virus in Rondônia, Brazilian Amazon. Acta Trop. 243, 106928 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. McGregor, B. L., Connelly, C. R. & Kenney, J. L. Infection, dissemination, and transmission potential of North American Culex quinquefasciatus, Culex tarsalis, and Culicoides sonorensis for Oropouche virus. Viruses 13, 226 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Mellor, P. S., Boorman, J. & Baylis, M. Culicoides biting midges: their role as arbovirus vectors. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 45, 307–340 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Payne, A. F. et al. Lack of competence of US mosquito species for circulating Oropouche virus. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 31, 619–621 (2024).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. de Mendonça, S. F. et al. Evaluation of Aedes aegypti, Aedes albopictus, and Culex quinquefasciatus mosquitoes Competence to Oropouche virus infection. Viruses 13, 755 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Erram, D., Blosser, E. M. & Burkett-Cadena, N. Habitat associations of Culicoides species (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) abundant on a commercial cervid farm in Florida, USA. Parasit. Vectors 12, 367 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Delatorre, E. et al. Emergence of Oropouche virus in Espírito Santo state, Brazil, 2024. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 31, 1178–1188 (2025).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Tegally, H. et al. Dynamics and ecology of a multi-stage expansion of Oropouche virus in Brazil. Preprint at medRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.29.24316328 (2024).

  21. 2022 Census: 87% of the Brazilian population lives in urban areas (Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística, 2024). https://agenciadenoticias.ibge.gov.br/en/agencia-news/2184-news-agency/news/41910-2022-census-87-of-the-brazilian-population-lives-in-urban-areas

  22. de Souza, W. M. & Weaver, S. C. Effects of climate change and human activities on vector-borne diseases. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 22, 476–491 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Population Census 2010 https://www.ibge.gov.br/en/statistics/multi-domain/culture-recreation-and-sports/18391-2010-population-census.html (2010).

  24. Cori, A., Ferguson, N. M., Fraser, C. & Cauchemez, S. A new framework and software to estimate time-varying reproduction numbers during epidemics. Am. J. Epidemiol. 178, 1505–1512 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Delatorre, E. et al. Emergence of Oropouche virus in Espirito Santo state, Brazil, 2024. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 31, 1178–1188 (2025).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Shao, Y., Magee, A. F., Vasylyeva, T. I. & Suchard, M. A. Scalable gradients enable Hamiltonian Monte Carlo sampling for phylodynamic inference under episodic birth-death-sampling models. PLoS Comput. Biol. 20, e1011640 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Stadler, T., Kuhnert, D., Bonhoeffer, S. & Drummond, A. J. Birth-death skyline plot reveals temporal changes of epidemic spread in HIV and hepatitis C virus (HCV). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 228–233 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ferreira, M. A. R. & Suchard, M. A. Bayesian analysis of elapsed times in continuous-time Markov chains. Can. J. Stat. 36, 355–368 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Suchard, M. A. et al. Bayesian phylogenetic and phylodynamic data integration using BEAST 1.10. Virus. Evol. 4, vey016 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Breiman, L. Random forests. Mach. Learn. 45, 5–32 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. McCullagh, P. & Nelder, J. A. Generalized Linear Model (Routledge, 2018).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Cushman, S. A. & Wasserman, T. N. in Machine Learning for Ecology and Sustainable Natural Resource Management (eds Humphries, G. et al.) 185–203 (Springer International, 2018).

  33. Kamvar, Z. N., Cai, J., Pulliam, J. R. C., Schumacher, J. & Jombart, T. Epidemic curves made easy using the R package incidence. F1000Res 8, 139 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE, 2025). https://www.ibge.gov.br/estatisticas/sociais/trabalho/22827-censo-demografico-2022.html

  35. Population Census 2022 (Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística, 2022).

  36. Baston, D. Exactextractr: Fast Extraction from Raster Datasets Using Polygons. R package version 0.10.1 (2025).

  37. Pereira, R. H. M. & Goncalves, C. N. geobr: Download Official Spatial Data Sets of Brazil https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/geobr/index.html (2025).

  38. Poppiel, R. R. et al. Soil health in Latin America and the Caribbean. Commun. Earth Environ. 6, 141 (2025).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Ishwaran, H. & Kogalur, U. B. Fast Unified Random Forests with randomForestSRrandomForestSRC: Fast Unified Random Forests for Survival, Regression, and Classification (RF-SRC). R package version 3.5.0 (2025).

  40. R Core Team and contributors worldwide The R Stats Package version 4.4.2. Vol. 2025 (2019).

  41. Fick, S. E. & Hijmans, R. J. WorldClim 2: new 1-km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol. 37, 4302–4315 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Agrometeorological Indicators from 1979 up to 2019 Derived from Reanalysis. Copernicus Climate Change Service https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/datasets/sis-agrometeorological-indicators?tab=overview (2025).

Download references

Acknowledgements

W.M.d.S. was supported by the Burroughs Wellcome Fund—Climate Change and Human Health Seed Grants (1022448). W.M.d.S. and N.R.F. were supported by the Wellcome Trust—Digital Technology Development Award in Climate Sensitive Infectious Disease Modelling (226075/Z/22/Z) and the Wellcome Trust Dengue and Zika Immunology and Genomics Multi-Country Network (DeZi Network; 316633/Z/24/Z). J.L.P.-M. is supported by the São Paulo Research Foundation (2022/10442-0), National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq, 309971/2023-3), and A.I.B. was supported by Cornell Atkinson Center seed funding. Y.S. and M.A.S. were supported by US National Institutes of Health grants R01 AI153044 and U19 AI135995. We thank J. A. Tida (www.plotmyscience.com) for the figure editing.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

X.H., L.W.A., A.I.B. and W.M.d.S. conceptualized the study. X.H., L.W.A., I.M.C., S.T.S.d.L., A.I.B. and W.M.d.S. contributed to the acquisition of data. X.H., L.W.A., I.M.C., Y.S., R.d.J., P.C.V., R.B.K., M.A., A.B.B.W., M.A.S., N.R.F., A.I.B. and W.M.d.S. contributed to the data analysis. X.H., L.W.A., Y.S., M.A., M.A.S., N.R.F., J.L.P.-M., L.B.D., A.I.B. and W.M.d.S. contributed to data interpretation. X.H., L.W.A., Y.S., A.I.B. and W.M.d.S. drafted the paper. X.H., L.W.A., M.A., A.B.B.W., M.A.S., N.R.F., J.L.P.-M., L.B.D., A.I.B. and W.M.d.S. revised the paper. A.I.B. and W.M.d.S. acquired funding for the study. The authors acknowledge funding from the MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis (MR/R015600/1), jointly funded by the UK Medical Research Council (MRC) and the UK Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office (FCDO), under the MRC/FCDO Concordat agreement, and also part of the EDCTP2 programme supported by the European Union. All authors read and approved the final version of the paper and the submission. X.H., A.I.B. and W.M.d.S. accessed and verified all the data reported in the study. X.H. and L.W.A. contributed equally to this work. A.I.B. and W.M.d.S. jointly supervised this work.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ana I. Bento or William M. de Souza.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Health thanks the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available. Primary Handling Editor: Manonmani Soundararajan, in collaboration with the Nature Health team.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Digital surveillance of Oropouche in Brazil.

A) Timeline of Google Trends activity for the term ‘Oropouche’ in Brazil from January 2014 to September 2025. B) Correlation between Google Trends activity and log10-transformed laboratory confirmed Oropouche fever cases per state (n = 27) from January 2014 to September 2025 (right). The correlation was calculated using the two-sided Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient (ρ = 0.6467, p < 0.0001). The black line represents the linear regression fit, and the light gray ribbon indicates 95% confidence intervals. AC, Acre; AL, Alagoas; AM, Amazonas; AP, Amapá; BA, Bahia; CE, Ceará; DF, Distrito Federal; ES, Espírito Santo; GO, Goiás; MA, Maranhão; MG, Minas Gerais; MS, Mato Grosso do Sul; MT, Mato Grosso; PA, Pará; PB, Paraíba; PE, Pernambuco; PI, Piauí; PR, Paraná; RJ, Rio de Janeiro; RN, Rio Grande do Norte; RO, Rondônia; RR, Roraima; RS, Rio Grande do Sul; SC, Santa Catarina; SE, Sergipe; SP, São Paulo; TO, Tocantins.

Extended Data Fig. 2 The distribution of diagnosis methods and types of biological samples collected for Oropouche virus detection in Brazil between 2014 and 2025.

A) Percentages of laboratory-confirmed Oropouche fever cases detected by RT-qPCR and serological methods per year from 2014 to 2025. B) Number of blood and other biological samples used to detect Oropouche virus per year from 2014 to 2025. C) Percentages of blood and other biological samples used to detect Oropouche virus per year from 2014 to 2025. D) Number of biological samples other than blood used to detected Oropouche virus per year from 2018 to 2025.

Extended Data Fig. 3 The epidemiological curve of Oropouche fever cases at national, rural, and urban levels from 2014 to 2025.

Oropouche fever laboratory-confirmed cases per epidemiological week at national (n = 203,080,756), rural (n = 25,572,339), and urban (n = 177,508,417) levels, from epidemiological week 1 of 2014 (December 29 to January 4) to epidemiological week 37 of 2025 (September 7 to 13).

Extended Data Fig. 4 Demographic characteristics of individuals diagnosed with Oropouche fever in Brazil from 2014 to 2025 based on municipality locations.

A) Oropouche fever incidence based on age-sex distribution of cases from 2023 to 2025 in rural municipalities. B) Oropouche fever incidence based on age-sex distribution of cases from 2023 to 2025 in urban municipalities.

Extended Data Fig. 5 Oropouche virus testing positivity rate by 26 Brazilian states and the Federal District for 2024 and 2025.

AC = Acre. AM = Amazonas. PA = Pará. RR = Roraima. RO = Rondônia. AP = Amapá. TO = Tocantins. PI = Piauí. BA = Bahia. MA = Maranhão. PE = Pernambuco. CE = Ceará. AL = Alagoas. SE = Sergipe. RN = Rio Grande do Norte. PB = Paraíba. MT = Mato Grosso. GO = Goiás. MS = Mato Grosso do Sul. DF = Distrito Federal (Federal District). MG = Minas Gerais. ES = Espírito Santo. RJ = Rio de Janeiro. SP = São Paulo. PR = Paraná. SC = Santa Catarina. RS = Rio Grande do Sul.

Extended Data Fig. 6 R estimates for Oropouche virus based on 590 concatenated large, medium, and small genomic segments from August 2010 to August 2024.

The posterior distribution of the viral effective reproductive number (Re) is represented as posterior mean (dark blue) and 95% CrIs (light blue ribbon).

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hua, X., Alexander, L.W., Claro, I.M. et al. Ecological and demographic drivers of Oropouche virus transmission. Nat. Health 1, 487–496 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44360-026-00065-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44360-026-00065-6

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing